by SP ➕follow (0) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 77 - 116 of 353 Next » Last » Search these comments
TOB is definitely over 40, no doubt.
Russian jew who immigrated, or perhaps Pakistani. Has ties to that part of the world, I don't sense that he is black.
Malcolm please don't make me barf. I plan on again giving my vote away to a third party person. Some people seem to get pissed that I "throw my vote away" but it is mine to do with what I want.
Obama and McCain both represent the 2 hands of the same corrupt people. Making the choice between the lesser of 2 evils is like asking how I want to be executed. In the end, did it matter which method was used?
I didn't say you were going to vote for either one :)
I just said I hope Obama gives you a job. I buy into your vision, I don't understand why it is so rare in this country. Other countries can make power from tides, we have ocean on 3 friggin sides of this country and suggesting it gets you labeled a liberal. Sheesh!
Carlin has a great reversal on the "If you don't vote don't bitch" cliche.
His reasoning was, if you vote then you got what you wanted so you can't bitch. He on the other hand, didn't vote, so therefore he can bitch because like you he didn't want to legitimize or pepetuate the scuzzy system.
I just wonder what the first smart apes that discovered fire had to deal with. Did leftist apes exist back then to prevent the smart ones from making fires out of fear for burning the forrest down?
I dont agree with all of it, but on the critical issues, I think he has it right.
Maybe the leftist apes tried to teach the other apes how to make the fire. The conservative apes demanded that a piece of meat be exchanged for a burning stick.
Nutty, I'm not sure I want to donate money and vote for a guy whose goal is "To send them a message." No offense. At least Ron Paul was in it to win it.
Define conservative ape.
If these conservative apes want to use a book to determine how I will live my life, they can stick it up their ass.
I consider myself a libertarian because I believe that I have the right to read the latest issue of Barely Legal while walking to the whore house to snort blow off a hookers ass and then screw her. This is all at a negotiated price between the hooker and me. The consequences of these actions would be my problem alone and would not be the gubermint's problem.
The conservative apes didn't understand how the fire got there so they figured God put it there.
I label myself libertarian because I don't go running around telling other people what to do. In general I believe in markets with a realistic level of regulation but free movement of prices. I believe in property rights but recognize and want recognition of social costs. I believe government has a role in innovation, and that when it works properly it promotes an environment where people can reach their full potential.
My idea of a conservative ape would be the guy that likes the fire that the smart one created. The conservative ape would require rituals like the sacrifice of food to the flames to please an unseen divine being. If you don't do it, they beat you over the head until you give in.
Instead of accepting the fire, they have to add shit to it so they can feel comfortable in their narcissistic view of being the center of the world.
TOB,
I was just being sarcastic and trying to paint a picture that would make the "family issues" people that vote for secret sodomites cringe.
Malcolm,
I agree with your views. I have wondered about how to keep the role of government in check.
I do believe a fiat currency can work if you could keep the corruption out. The reason why gold was used for hundreds of years as a currency boils down to trust. You can't fake gold. In the end human nature makes the idea of a fiat currency based only on trust something that is almost impossible to work.
I have no use of the yellow metal. I am just pointing out why some prefer it. Something that can't be faked and can garner the support of having value does have appeal. The problem comes in when it actually prevents the economy from growing. Deflation via the smaller share of gold per person makes barrowing for investment a bad idea.
OT: btw- nutty + other physics people: what do you think of this guy:
bs or genius?
Isn't he also a plumber in Ohio?
How does gold address the problem of hoarding.
Any financial uncertainity could cause hoarding and thus make deflation a big problem.
We can always create new money with fiat currency.
Fiat is very powerful if used correctly. If used unwisely, it could be devastating.
TOB : demurrage looks like an interesting idea.
I have some doubts on its widescale implementation though.
Enforcing demurrage looks like a challenge.
Fiat currency is more risky but removes some real bottlenecks present in gold backed currency.
In the end, time will tell which one is superior.
In the end, time will tell which one is superior.
It is still about strong hands versus weak hands. As I have said, humanity is a tragedy. Or, at best, a black comedy.
Which one do you prefer? Bankster politicians or military dictators?
The former group probably favors fiat currency whilst the later group prefers hard currency.
It is just like Alien v. Predator... whoever wins, we lose.
thenuttyneutron Says:
homepages.wmich.edu/~drichter/gossetzome.htm
Wow! I wonder how long this took to build.
If you are interested in this stuff, you should check out some of the Tibetan Buddhist and ancient Indian chalk patterns. They are two-dimensional projections of hyper-spaces.
A lot of those projections involve compound transformations - but they are expressed node-based patterns that are so simple that Tibetan kids practice drawing them for entertainment. A professor at Urbana-Champaign gave a very interesting talk about it a few years ago, but I forgot his name.
TOB:
Lisi is for real, and up to 10 minutes in, he's only talking about what is already known. The rest is extension of the kind of symmetries that have already yielded actual results. E8 efflorescence is a hell of a lot more likely basis for reality than the incredible crap string theorists churn out, that have yet to yield one verified prediction.
Indeed SP, the Kalachakra Mandala and the Palace of Shambala are exactly where my mind goes in recognition when I see the E8 rotations.
Kipling on Conservative Apes Vs. Liberal Apes: Very timely!
A pull from the above:
In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,
By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;
But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: "If you don't work you die."
Uh-huh.
Pete:
As I have said, humanity is a tragedy. Or, at best, a black comedy.
It all depends on whether it ends in a funeral or a wedding!
"btw- nutty + other physics people: what do you think of this guy:"
the E8 theory does evoke some feelings of truth and simplicity. Although it's not my favorite.
OMG NASCAR is having financial problems
Yes, one of the "corrections" when the debt powered overheating is turned off. NASCAR drivers will have to settle for more reasonable compensation as ticket prices and sponsor fees must fall to more affordable levels. The same effect will hit overcompensated movie stars, NFL players, and other entertainers as people will no longer pay exorbitant fees for tickets, nor will sponsors continue to overpay for ads.
Headset:
Yes, one of the “corrections†when the debt powered overheating is turned off.
Nice to know there are a few people out there who "get it." Cars, Season Tickets, $50K kitchens, Stocks... just about anything with "disposable income" written on it to be (read "borrowed money") have jumped through the roof in the last 20 years. Irrational exuberance indeed. And the number of people who think they "deserve" a Carribean Cruise and a Swiss Ski vacation every year is simply astonishing. Those used to be once-in-a-lifetime things, and, but for borrowed money, would still be.
>>OMG NASCAR is having financial problems
I hope NASCAR goes bankrupt. Spending all that oil on going around in circles and accomplishing nothing is obscene.
I like the idea of illegal Grey Hound Street Racing.
Another good one would be St. Bernard’s racing around the NASCAR Tracks with Colobus Monkeys as jockeys.
How 'bout some Wall St CEOs running in ciricles, literally. That would reduce the amount of mischief.
Cars, Season Tickets, $50K kitchens, Stocks… just about anything with “disposable income†written on it to be (read “borrowed moneyâ€) have jumped through the roof in the last 20 years.
Uncanny. That sounds like the script for one of those "priceless" Mastercard commercials.
Best proof that the bailout was for Wall Street execs:
No "Sidewalk Soufflés" in front of the skyscrapers. Serious economic downturn usually produces a morbid rain of the newly unrich. Unless, of course, thier fortunes were saved somehow.
Headset:
My personal indicator of the true sanity turn-around? When Starbucks files Chapter 11. ($8 for a cuppa? Dese peeple r knuts!)
But I ain't holding my breath.
Starbucks is closing a lot of stores, and now we are hearing the "cool people" talk about the superior taste of the the much less expensive McDonalds and WaWa coffees.
Hope!
I'm a Folgers kinda guy, but glad to hear about Starby's. Next thing you know the yuppies will move back to drinking Boone's Farm and Gallo. I feel like that 70's show is coming back around, starring Barry O as James Earl Carter. Stagflation and 20% CDs here we come!
I'm also out of Moderation, which is always a good thing. I am immoderate, after all.
The ugly details of Paulson's contracts are starting to trickle out. NOW is the time to fix this, all who were against the bailout should not wash their hands of this You should demand that Paulson does it right.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/corporate-governance-takes-back-seat/story.aspx?guid={8750f6ed-3f7f-4e80-b39a-c8d03e13234a}
As if demand things make them happen...
Do not confuse what ought to be and what is.
It is what it is. And it does not depend upon what the definition of the word 'is' is.
Wall Street banks in $70bn staff payout
Pay and bonus deals equivalent to 10% of US government bail-out package
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/oct/17/executivesalaries-banking
« First « Previous Comments 77 - 116 of 353 Next » Last » Search these comments
According to this article in the NY-Times:
http://tinyurl.com/3hzwmp
In its latest questionable tactic, the Treasury is forcing banks to take billions of taxpayer dollars and lend it out - effectively trying desperately to blow some air back into the lending bubble. They know it will ultimately lead to an unsustainable debt burden on the US taxpayer, and very likely US government default but they don't care. This can't just be stupidity or greed - it is treason.
(Mish's take on this is over here: Compelling Banks To Lend)
The actions taken by the Treasury in recent days show a pattern of putting U.S. citizens/taxpayers under a huge public debt burden, and also encourage every possible way to get them into private debt. Simultaneously, avenues that would _reduce_ private debt, or reduce risk to taxpayers are being blocked, derailed or discouraged.
Why?
Why is there a systematic policy bias towards forcing the US into default? Why is the Treasury making decisions that push generations of Americans into debt-slavery and eventual destruction of US sovereign currency?
Which team is Paulson batting for?
SP