patrick.net

i agree

bring back catvation

ptiemann says

I miss surfer-x with his unique way of expression

Yeah, he was one of the best. His use of anger and foul language never failed to be eloquent and entertaining. That musta been 4 years ago by now.

Philistine says

I miss HaHa and OO and az_rob and all the other original gangsta’s that used to stir up trouble.

I thought az_rob and Roberto Aribas was the same guy. Am I wrong, Roberto?

justme says

Philistine says

I miss HaHa and OO and az_rob and all the other original gangsta’s that used to stir up trouble.

I thought az_rob and Roberto Aribas was the same guy. Am I wrong, Roberto?

Correct roberto is the new name.

Where is Nomo nowadays?

The MLS listing for 21 Penhurst Ave, Daly City, CA 94015 shows this in the private agent remarks:

Private : REO. Title conveyed via Special Warr. Deed &/or local equiv. ALL offers subj to terms & cond in Seller Contr. Buyer to close with Seller’s Closing Firm if not buyer to pay for owner’s title policy, regardless of local custom. List seller as Owner of record

I'm assuming this is a situation where they take titles even though they have misplaced the note? The bank is willing to guarantee the title it appears.

Some us cannot resist reaching for that....

Gotta love insurance. All you have to do is look at how the companies are structured to see its a sham.

Texas wins series in 6 games.

It's very scary out there. These people have degrees and they are still out of work.

The one that was really amazing was the guy that had to settle for a part-time job at Target for $9.50 an hour and he was glad to get it. Even if you had your home paid for, how could you survive in San Jose on a part time job paying close to minimum wage?

It was $9.25 per hour. Scary, for sure.

How about the lady that was making $70K and is now reduced to digging in garbage bins for recyclables?

Yikes. Lots of sad stories. :(

The guy who made 200k+/yr, in his early 50s it looks like, but ate through all their savings AND retirement savings in 2 yrs 3 months?

I guess people didn't realize that if they work for 40 years, assuming everything goes right and you want to live a similiar lifestyle, if you live another 15 years, you probably should be saving ~20-25% of your gross income...not the -0.5% Americans have been doing.

Sadly if that situation hit most of us, including myself, I would be in the same situation. Guess all those bailouts didn't work at all.

I feel for this man.

RayAmerica says

How about the lady that was making $70K and is now reduced to digging in garbage bins for recyclables?

Obviously these people just aren't working hard enough--right Ray? After all, anyone that can't find work just isn't trying, right?

I wish I had a booth at that job fair offering Ayahuasca tourism.

RayAmerica says

The one that was really amazing was the guy that had to settle for a part-time job at Target for $9.50 an hour and he was glad to get it. Even if you had your home paid for, how could you survive in San Jose on a part time job paying close to minimum wage?

Sell it, rent, live on the profits. Or stay and try to cover the RE taxes.

klarek says

RayAmerica says

The one that was really amazing was the guy that had to settle for a part-time job at Target for $9.50 an hour and he was glad to get it. Even if you had your home paid for, how could you survive in San Jose on a part time job paying close to minimum wage?

Sell it, rent, live on the profits. Or stay and try to cover the RE taxes.

Who's going to buy it if so many people are unemployed?

The people who ARE employed are either 1) too scared to buy because they're worried they'll be unemployed 2) won't buy at the price that the sellers expect

CaffeineAddict says

Who’s going to buy it if so many people are unemployed?

Are housing prices there below $0? It's paid for. Someone will buy it. Don't be dramatic.

tatupu70 says

Obviously these people just aren’t working hard enough–right Ray? After all, anyone that can’t find work just isn’t trying, right?

When did I ever say that?

RayAmerica says

tatupu70 says

Obviously these people just aren’t working hard enough–right Ray? After all, anyone that can’t find work just isn’t trying, right?

When did I ever say that?

Maybe I misunderstood your feelings on welfare. I thought you believed that everyone on welfare was simply too lazy to find work. They enjoyed living off the government.

Do you now think that welfare is a good thing?

tatupu70 says

Maybe I misunderstood your feelings on welfare. I thought you believed that everyone on welfare was simply too lazy to find work. They enjoyed living off the government.
Do you now think that welfare is a good thing?

When did I ever say "EVERYONE on welfare" is "too lazy to find work?" Be my guest and copy and paste anything that is even remotely close to that.

If you are going to attempt to debate, at least make an effort to be somewhat truthful. This is just another pitiful example of how lame the left really is.

Republican v Dem is a debate for the goddamn scrapheap. Try the American people v the emerging Corporatocracy.

At least this theme is finally finding its way into the broader public consciousness. Five years ago, NOBODY talked about it. I don't think you can say that now.

It's a sunny version of Detroit, right down to the few pathetic excuses for "skyscrapers" downtown all being empty.

1 sad story about a failed realtor.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101023/ap_on_re_us/us_mummified_body

If so many people out of job, why is the house price in San Jose so high?

In fact, from 2000 to 2010, the house price was doubled but 150k people lost job.
How can that be possible?

One factor is that the jumbo loan limit in San Jose was raised to $729,750 specifically to screw buyers as much as possible.

Of course our dear "representatives" didn't put it that way. The official reason was "to support home prices" but the actual intended effect is to get you as deeply into debt as possible, because it's no longer legal to enslave you with iron chains. They have to use the chains of debt, but it works almost as well.

The higher jumbo loan limit means that banks can originate loans for up to that amount with no risk, because they can sell the loans with the explicit guarantee of payment from Fannie Mae, which really means the explicit guarantee of payment by Tea Party fools in the midwest and south who are too busy protesting health care for black people to notice that they're being bankrupted by mortgages in California.

CaffeineAddict says

Who’s going to buy it if so many people are unemployed?

I would, if they dropped the asking price enough.

CaffeineAddict says

Yikes. Lots of sad stories.
The guy who made 200k+/yr, in his early 50s it looks like, but ate through all their savings AND retirement savings in 2 yrs 3 months?

I was wondering about that one myself. I mean, when you are in your early 50's you should probably already have enpugh cash stashed to live off of for at least 15 years.

Tea Party fools in the midwest and south who are too busy protesting health care for black people

Please provide your source for that statement.

tatupu70 says

RayAmerica says

How about the lady that was making $70K and is now reduced to digging in garbage bins for recyclables?

Obviously these people just aren’t working hard enough–right Ray? After all, anyone that can’t find work just isn’t trying, right?

I agree tat they aren't trying hard enough. Around here all you see cleaning office buildings are Mexicans. That and I'm sure it's still all Mexicans picking fruit, etc.

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6470184n&tag=contentBody;housing

Another story.

It's kind of hard to feel sorry at all for that young couple who overbought, lived it up, now living rent/mortgage-free and is going to walk away. He's an auditor of all things. Wonder if he shows any mercy to those he audits? My guess is no.

Actually forget feeling sorry for him. The man should be stoned. He doesn't even feel remorseful or guilty about it unlike the other people. He sounds like he's almost proud of it.

I saw the piece when it aired on Sunday. I turned to my wife and said "why didn't at some point, consider expanding their job search to beyond their local area?"

Perhaps they did, perhaps it didn't help, but certainly, you hit a point where you need to expand your focus beyond your comfort zone. Easier said than done, to be sure, but moving to a lower cost area has to be on the table as a potential option.

If everyone saves like crazy, we will never get out of this recession.

Someone has to spend like crazy to boost the economy.

Very interesting 60Min picked silicon valley of all places.

What can one say what hasnt been said before?

Silicon Valley is a highly deflationary industry, high home prices contribute to job losses, most experienced workers will get termed earlier than a younger less experienced worker, SV is not immune to downturns, etc etc etc. Sadly many believed the myths than the hard cold reality.

zzyzzx says

CaffeineAddict says
Yikes. Lots of sad stories.
The guy who made 200k+/yr, in his early 50s it looks like, but ate through all their savings AND retirement savings in 2 yrs 3 months?
I was wondering about that one myself. I mean, when you are in your early 50’s you should probably already have enpugh cash stashed to live off of for at least 15 years.

More likely many today didnt see the SV recession back in the early 90s was like. Had you seen/lived throught the early 90s recession in SV you would have been a huge net saver since and you would not have overpaid and overborrowed for a home.

For the guy in the 60min, he most likely used his savings as downpayment on a $800-1M home in Palo Alto. There you go ! Rich tech executive!

Second, at 200K, so much for the myth these people over 50 are swimming in wealth and ready to pick up 2-3 homes when prices bottom.

EastCoastBubbleBoy says

I saw the piece when it aired on Sunday. I turned to my wife and said “why didn’t at some point, consider expanding their job search to beyond their local area?”

Tech industry is a shrinking mature industry. 315 cos in 1994, 417 in 2000, down to 240 (and falling) in 2009. If we start to go down to 175, it will really start to hit home for many.

http://www.siliconbeat.com/2010/02/17/vanishing-public-companies-lead-to-the-incredible-shrinking-silicon-valley/

One of the most significant trends I’ve been watching over the past decade is the dramatic drop in public companies in Silicon Valley. Naturally, that number was artificially inflated during the dot-com bubble when it reached 417 in 2000. For our purposes, Silicon Valley includes San Mateo and Santa Clara counties, and the southern half of Alameda County.

That’s not just less than the dot-com era, that’s well below the 315 public companies the valley had in 1994 when the Mercury News started keeping track.

How much of that tech shrinkage is consolidation though? I for example am sad watching Sun disappear into the Oracle behemoth.

As I am too, i rather have more diverse companies each focusing in their market niech, which employ seperate managment who are experts in such industries.

When it comes to Oracle there were lots of consolidations... hum! will Oracle at some time be "too big to fail".

For the small start ups, they are falling/failing very quickly! Crap! i really hate that!