Comments 1 - 3 of 3 Search these comments
Oh, well. The Nobel committee gave him the peace prize out of some kind of politically correct temporary insanity. Must have been for stopping a food fight at the Harvard Law canteen.
Bush was so much better. No innocents were killed in Afghanistan or Iraq.
He accomplished this without loss of any American lives.
Actually I'm not on anyone's camp in this regard. It's not a bush v Obama thing unfortunately. Obama is what it is and it's terrible. It would have been terrible under McCain and yeah, the latest surge definitely began under bush.
I support Obama in this election and I think it's clear the democrats need to win in order to secure a better next few years for the majority of Americans, and the republicans are clearly almost at the point of insanity at this point, i agree the choices are rotten, but we need to be honest about the current state of US politics, and the Obama admin is doing terrible things.
Elect Obama please but be honest about the state of US politics, which is dismal.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article32878.htm
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/plan-for-hunting-terrorists-signals-us-intends-to-keep-adding-names-to-kill-lists/2012/10/23/4789b2ae-18b3-11e2-a55c-39408fbe6a4b_story.html
"October 27, 2012 "Information Clearing House" - The Washington Post has just laid out, in horrifying, soul-slaughtering detail, the Obama Administration's ongoing effort to expand, entrench and "codify" the practice of murder and terrorism by the United States government. The avowed, deliberate intent of these sinister machinations is to embed the use of death squads and drone terror attacks into the policy apparatus of future administrations, so that the killing of human beings outside all pretense of legal process will go on, year after year after year, even when the Nobel Peace Laureate has left office."
#politics