« First « Previous Comments 67 - 87 of 87 Search these comments
It's not a lie if I voice my opinion.
No it's lie to insinuate something you know to be untrue.
Like that fact you claimed I would delete your post based on NOTHING!
No it's lie to insinuate something you know to be untrue.
The part that you obviously don't seem to understand is that it would only have been a lie had I known it to be untrue. But I actually believed that you would delete the post. I based that on the many outrageous statements that you have made. Or, almost made, given your command of the English language.
Like that fact you claimed I would delete your post based on NOTHING!
It is indeed a fact that I insinuated that you would delete my post. You get credit for getting that right. However, it certainly wasn't based on "nothing," as referenced by my statement above.
But, once again, I do have to go now although I will return later. Feel free to carry on without me.
Why do you continue to personally insult me?
You actually are personally insulting yourself. Therein lies the rub.
You have no reason to think I would delete regular conversation, it's pure speculation and ultimately you lied. I delete trolls and people who insult me.
You keep insulting me and so I will delete your comments.
Well, then, even in your definition of the word, I didn't lie, now did I?
This has been a lovely afternoon. But I refuse to continue this battle of wits because you are unarmed.
I had to "ignore" 121212 myself. I don't mind opposing opinions, someone proving me wrong, or even someone calling me a dumbass, but everytime you disagree with 121212, he either 1) deletes your post or 2) spews his nonsensical and meaningless diarrhea of the mouth. Post after post after post of inane ramblings. Basically he has to silence others opinions because he can't support his own. That shit is RIDICULOUS!!!!
Unfortunately he has a few popular threads going now and I'm interested in what the more logical posters have to say. Oh well, I guess I'll have to start my own threads, and hope others do the same.
Yes, you wouldn't see any threads they start.
True.
I like the forums where everyone posts as anonymous, and the community can like, dislike, and maybe even vote to hide comment
This is a new idea for me. So you're saying that comments that get disliked by users with a good reputation would become invisible to all users, unless they click some special "show all" link?
Featured articles on yahoo.com have comments that are hidden depending on how many dislikes they have. It is automatically hidden, but you can "unhide" the comment to read it if you want to. Check it out. You may have to search a little bit to find one of 121212's comments on there that has been hidden.
http://news.yahoo.com/high-court-fight-looms-over-carry-gun-100107234.html
Thanks, but I don't see the "unhide" link. Is it called "unhide" or something else?
121212 is Ruki...ditch his ass...
Case Closed.
"121212 said: " It’s unclear what Fox News was expecting from Pulitizer Prize winning journalist Tom Ricks when they brought him on to discuss Benghazi but it’s clear they did not pre-interview him in the slightest. If they had, it’s safe to say this wouldn’t have happened:
121212 says
SoftShell is Shrek/Ruki if I remember rightly, it was hard to keep count of all his accounts..
Only Ruki would delete normal posts.
121212 does it with regularity.
that's enough proof for me he/she's Ruki...
Ditch them.
Case Closed.
You must be talking about the Occupy Wall Street people in Oakland....
Oh wait..I forgot...they are Liberals...
Peter P says
Yep. When someone incites violence he crosses the line.
This is not the first time I have seen "conservatives" on this site advocate for murder and/or torture as a solution to something they perceive as a problem
I had to "ignore" 121212 myself.
I should have stopped fucking with her (him?), but it was like a train wreck and I couldn't look away. I should know better - but it entertained me while the snow fell.
he actually called himself that first, i was quoting him
CaptainShuddup says
That no good son of a bitch captainshuddup politicized the event, by pointing out the double standards of how the collective Patnet perceives these stories based on GEO location.
Now the Iatola 121212 is bent out of shape with his manufactured outrage, he's forgotten why he was so upset in the first place.
So he posted this gem. Libs do as them say not as them do!
listen you son of bitch you made the first filthy disgusting comment on that thread!
Really so where's the original post, anyone can put anything they want in quotes. I can't seem to find where I said that anywhere.
I thought we're not supposed to call people names Patrick?
Or does that only apply to "THEM"?
It's too bad that people who are on "ignore" do not have some indication next to their name regarding how many people are ignoring them. Such a device would quite well communicate what the community thinks of the ignored person. In fact, it would be quite invaluable and, if many others were likely to ignore the person in response to seeing said device, it would prove to be an effective anti-troll device as well.
It's too bad that people who are on "ignore" do not have some indication next to their name regarding how many people are ignoring them. Such a device would quite well communicate what the community thinks of the ignored person. In fact, it would be quite invaluable and, if many others were likely to ignore the person in response to seeing said device, it would prove to be an effective anti-troll device as well.
Your wish has been granted.
What do others think? Is that useful, or too offensive?
It would also be helpful if we could see who's doing all of the disliking.
I dunno about putting names to dislikes and ignores. Seems like that's going too far somehow.
zzyzzx says" "It's been several days and I still can't find any Sandy Hook Shooting related Pedobear pics. You people are disappointing me."
"Pedobear is an Internet meme that became popular through the imageboard 4chan.[1] As the name suggests ("pedo" being short for "pedophile"), it is portrayed as a pedophilic bear.[2] It is a concept used to mock pedophiles or people who have an interest in minors or jailbait. The bear image has been likened to bait used to lure children or as a mascot for pedophiles.[3][4][5]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedobear
this speech is not acceptable.
It's FILTH!
There is enough information in his post to have him arrested.
http://www.prevent-abuse-now.com/law3a.htm
" ... we are stating in no uncertain terms that we have
'zero tolerance' for the sexual exploitation of children."
Senator Orin Hatch
« First « Previous Comments 67 - 87 of 87 Search these comments
I can't believe anyone would post stuff like this in a public forum:
I hope the police contact me so I can turn over everything I know about him.
So he's nuked again, for the fourth time.
Next time he shows up, please tell me it's the same person and I'll nuke him again instantly.