patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,206,229 comments by 14,334 users - GNL, GreaterNYCDude, Nvrquit online now
The republican have a way of taking the liberl bs and beating them over the head
invite response
2012 Dec 31, 3:04am 13,620 views 86 comments
« First « Previous Comments 31 - 70 of 86 Next » Last » Search these comments
What I proved is that you have no grasp of technology and the founding fathers would not have dreamed of what we have today.
I know more about tech long before you took a dump in your diapers.
Again.. all your showing is your insanity in controlling people like a fascist and communist.
a defect of your generation...
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 9:01am
What I proved is that you have no grasp of technology and the founding fathers would not have dreamed of what we have today.
I know more about tech long before you took a dump in your diapers.
Again.. all your showing is your insanity in controlling people like a fascist and communist.
I don't think so moron. Your arguments are weak and without merit. Your understanding of technology is myopic and your rhetorical application is wrong.
You obviously vote Republican, math and science are not your strong subjects
math and science long before you were born... after all i am native to silicon valley...
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 9:04am
Thomas, keep comparing balloons and nukes,lmfao! IDIOT!
You also have no idea of which generation I belong, so again your arguments contain no merit are without validation and plain old wrong.
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 9:05am
You obviously vote Republican, math and science are not your strong subjects
math and science long before you were born... after all i am native to silicon valley...
Long before most people by the sounds of it. Your out of touch, you dont know the different between a phone, cellphone and a smartphone. The founding fathers could not have dreamed of that progression.
You also compare antiquated technologies and inventions to modern day technology that people 250 years ago flying balloons would not have imagined. Why do you fight this? Your wrong, this was your analogy.
I don't think so moron. Your arguments are weak and without merit. Your understanding of technology is myopic and your rhetorical application is wrong.
this has nothing to do with ME.. and everything to do with your liberal elitist attitude,
what ? are you the chosen one like your leader Obama-rama...
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 9:08am
math and science long before you were born... after all i am native to silicon valley...
So what? You grasp of technology and the past is flawed.
Long before most people by the sounds of it. Your out of touch, you dont know the different between a phone, cellphone and a smartphone. The founding fathers could not have dreamed of that progression.
You also compare antiquated technologies and inventions to modern day technology that people 250 years ago flying balloons would not have imagined. Why do you fight this? Your wrong, this was your analogy.
all things today came from some antiquated invention from 100s of years ago...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connections_%28TV_series%29
Connections explores an "Alternative View of Change" (the subtitle of the series) that rejects the conventional linear and teleological view of historical progress. Burke contends that one cannot consider the development of any particular piece of the modern world in isolation. Rather, the entire gestalt of the modern world is the result of a web of interconnected events, each one consisting of a person or group acting for reasons of their own motivations (e.g. profit, curiosity, religious) with no concept of the final, modern result of what either their or their contemporaries' actions finally led to. The interplay of the results of these isolated events is what drives history and innovation, and is also the main focus of the series and its sequels.
To demonstrate this view, Burke begins each episode with a particular event or innovation in the past (usually Ancient or Medieval times) and traces the path from that event through a series of seemingly unrelated connections to a fundamental and essential aspect of the modern world. For example, the episode "The Long Chain" traces the invention of plastics from the development of the fluyt, a type of Dutch cargo ship.
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 9:10am
liberal elitist attitude,
Thanks. But I am not an elite or a liberal. But you are an idiot.
So what? You grasp of technology and the past is flawed.
you clearly flunked history.. just a obamatron.. what ever the liberal media pumps into you.
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 9:11am
what ? are you the chosen one like your leader Obama-rama...
for a person living in such a progressive state you would think you would have been smarter, guess that cali for you.
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 9:12am
Simply put the founding fathers would not have understood science today.
They could never have predicted it.
Thomas, grow up.
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 9:14am
all things today came from some antiquated invention from 100s of years ago...
of course you would attempt to redux your argument to that, it's easier to make.
BULLSHIT!
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 9:14am
Do you know how many new elements we have found/created in the past 250 years?
Do you know how many new materials we have created in the past 250 years?
Crashing Balloons as aircraft. Shut the fuck up Thomas.
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 9:17am
flunked history.. just a obamatron.. what ever the liberal media pumps into you.
I always knew you were a moron. Liberal bashing me will get you nowhere, I am not a liberal.
of course you would attempt to redux your argument to that, it's easier to make.
BULLSHIT!
Do you know how many new elements we have found/created in the past 250 years?
Do you know how many new materials we have created in the past 250 years?
Crashing Balloons as aircraft. Shut the fuck up Thomas.
like so many libs who keep ignoring history...
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 9:46am
like so many libs who keep ignoring history...
You are wrong. Face it.
You don't want a conversation.
Yawn, your pathetic. You ignored everything, everything I said, so go fuck yourself.
Balloons. lol
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 9:48am
like so many libs who keep ignoring history...
YOU ARE A Fucking IDIOT , you know that right?
You cannot even hold a conversation, which is recommended that you read the other persons information. You really are not interested in conversation, you only want to be right.
Well, your wrong.
BALLOONS! YOU FOOL!
like so many libs who keep ignoring history...
You are wrong. Face it.
Yawn, your pathetic. You ignored everything I said, so go fuck yourself.
you lost... so your ticked now... too bad!
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 9:51am
you lost... so your ticked now... too bad!
No, you think the founding fathers foresaw modern technology based on what , a fucking BALLOON!
Shut the fuck up, idiot!
Keep ignoring the facts Thomas, that must be the way you got your cali education.
JodyChunder
2013 Jan 22, 10:01am
The best thing about this thread is all the potential epitaph material. For example, envision any of the following subtle epithets engraved in granite:
BALLOONS! YOU FOOL!
BULLSHIT!
Shut the fuck up Thomas.
what a chump !
Truly excellent!
ah... Thedaytoday, is a control freak.. s/he has limited mindset..
unable to understand the possibility. If our founding fathers were
so limited.. they, and we, would would been royalists and we be part of the UK.
do not forgot one other one from Thedaytoday ... "you racists".... ah Golden !
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 10:06am
Disagree.. they understood how man created inventions and would continue to do so in the future.. be it from the Biblical times to Middle Ages to their contemporary periods..they too understood crazy suicide bombers... the were called the Mongols even in their history books.
"Jacques Charles and the Robert brothers launched their balloon, the world's first hydrogen-filled balloon, on August 27, 1783, from the Champ de Mars (now the site of the Eiffel Tower); Benjamin Franklin was among the crowd of onlookers."
Thomas your a moron
No, you think the founding fathers foresaw modern technology based on what , a fucking BALLOON!
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 10:07am
s/he has limited mindset..
I do not have a limited mindset, I am extremely inventive. In fact you are the one who thinks think the founding fathers had a grasp of future technology based on what!
a BALLOON!
That's a limited mindset.
They had no clue and neither do you.
I am infact a futurist !
Thedaytoday .... take your meds.. your duplicating your posts... maybe call a doctor or a mental health institution..
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 10:10am
thomaswong.1986 and balloons are technology from the future!
Idiot.
Keep on the prozac
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 10:10am
take your meds.. your duplicating your posts
Perhaps you will read one and answer it instead of creating your own answers that make no sense.
Clearly you are not interested in the facts , typical repuke.
In fact you are the one who thinks think the founding fathers had a grasp of future technology based on what!
a BALLOON!
as did everyone... just the beginning... now man can fly.. what other things will happen?
for someone who calls himself "inventive" you certainly dont see the connections and possibilities... your failure for lack of imagination...
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 10:13am
thomaswong.1986 your arguments make no sense and you have no leg to stand on.
Balloons of the future filled with hydrogen.
IDIOT!
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 10:14am
Thomas, you think the founding fathers foresaw modern technology based on what , a fucking BALLOON!
Shut the fuck up, idiot!
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 10:16am
They too understood crazy suicide bombers... the were called the Mongols even in their history books.
Idiot! You really are full of moronic gems.
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 10:17am
The first aircraft disaster occurred in May 1785 when the town of Tullamore, County Offaly, Ireland was seriously damaged when the crash of a balloon resulted in a fire that burned down about 100 houses, making the town home to the world's first aviation disaster. To this day, the town shield depicts a phoenix rising from the ashes.
Idiot!
Idiot! You really are full of moronic gems.
fine example of someone "over the edge"... best check yourself in..
before you go on a shooting spree...
Thedaytoday
2013 Jan 22, 10:19am
A hydrogen gas balloon or aerostat is not an aircraft
An airship is a floating aircraft
Y
2013 Jan 22, 11:43am
yeah, that's just the type of banter you get when you converse with
1212GASBAG12
The best thing about this thread is all the potential epitaph material. For example, envision any of the following subtle epithets engraved in granite:
BALLOONS! YOU FOOL!
BULLSHIT!
Shut the fuck up Thomas.
what a chump !
Truly excellent!
Y
2013 Jan 22, 11:45am
Correct.
You are a GASBAG.
flunked history.. just a obamatron.. what ever the liberal media pumps into you.
I always knew you were a moron. Liberal bashing me will get you nowhere, I am not a liberal.
Y
2013 Jan 22, 11:46am
Quite correct. You would know about all things "gas", you overblown GASBAG.
A hydrogen gas balloon or aerostat is not an aircraft
Dan8267
2013 Jan 22, 11:51am
Privacy and safety is a tradeoff. Most people are willing to give up some privacy in exchange for safety.
I've heard that argument before.
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. -- Ben Franklin
Privacy and safety is not a tradeoff. Safety is inversely proportional to transparency, not infringement of privacy.
For a society to be safe, all government actions must be transparent. Invasions of privacy like strip searches are not necessary. For example, it is far more crucial to secure safety in Congress than in a prison since our government and our entire nation is dependent on Congress. Therefore, if strip searches are necessary to ensure adequate safety in prisons, then it is also necessary to strip search every member of Congress and every person entering Congress. Conversely, if Congress can be safeguarded without strip searches, then so can a prison. So, why do we strip search prisoners and not Congressmen?
We have security theater in our country. This is not the same thing as real security.
« First « Previous Comments 31 - 70 of 86 Next » Last » Search these comments
http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/lawmaker-slams-asinine-newspaper-for-publishing-gun-info.html
Ball, from Patterson, NY, said he planned to introduce legislation that would keep permit information private except to prosecutors and police.
Those Libs should be proud of them selves. NY will now have concealed, concealed permits. Kind of a wrong knee jerk response if you ask me. A better suited law, would be while anyone is free to request information. They are not at liberty to publish or reproduce that information in any way. You may feel free to post it or share that single hard copy as much as you want, as long as it is the original, while you are not allowed to make copies. But you may not post it on websites, or publish information in news papers.
But I guess it was too hard of a stretch to make that connection.
#politics