0
0

AAPL to $500?


 invite response                
2012 Jan 6, 6:16am   82,953 views  241 comments

by Vicente   ➕follow (1)   💰tip   ignore  

Starting my New Year with a nice bump on the AAPL I picked up last year.

Consensus on AAPL to $500? It's testing 52-week high.

« First        Comments 145 - 184 of 241       Last »     Search these comments

145   zzyzzx   2013 Jan 24, 8:52am  

After Hours : 448.53 1.97 (0.44%) 7:46PM EST - Nasdaq Real Time Pric

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/samsung-posts-record-profit-000031770.html

Samsung posts record profit; will not reduce spending

SEOUL (Reuters) - Samsung Electronics Co reported a record quarterly profit of $8.3 billion and kept its 2013 investment plans at the previous year's level, defying expectations that it may reduce spending amid weaker demand for computer chips.

The South Korean firm said October-December operating profit increased 89 percent from a year ago to 8.84 trillion korean won ($8.3 billion), in line with its earlier estimate.

In a statement on Friday, Samsung said it would keep 2013 investment at a similar level to 2012, despite a bleak PC outlook and a move by rival Apple Inc to diversify its supplier base.

146   nope   2013 Jan 24, 2:37pm  

BoomAndBustCycle says

So on the two largest telcos in the U.S... 74% of all phones sold are IPHONES.. and Wall Street panic sells?

If only the two largest US carriers were the entire smartphone market. Or even the entire US market. Or even the majority of the US market...

Investors are making bets. They're betting that Apple's growth isn't sustainable. It's pretty simple, actually.

RentingForHalfTheCost says

Kevin says

Apple only employs about 30000 people in Cupertino. Most don't live there. They don't exist in a vacuum.

I never said they did. What I was insinuating was that Apple's stock has given many employees the ability to pay double or more than they should for a sugar shack in Cupertino. With this latest drop you can be sure the real estate market will suffer in that area. Back to reality sucks.

Kinda depends on where the investors take their money. Most of what has been taken out of Apple has been added to Google, Facebook, and other tech companies.

Apple isn't the only game in town, or even the largest employer. Rank and file employees don't get enough RSUs to be buying million dollar houses. The overall impact will be insignificant, just like the uptick from the round of IPOs over the last couple years was insignificant.

147   BoomAndBustCycle   2013 Jan 25, 3:54am  

Kevin says

If only the two largest US carriers were the entire smartphone market. Or even the entire US market. Or even the majority of the US market...

Investors are making bets. They're betting that Apple's growth isn't sustainable. It's pretty simple, actually.

it is the majority of the US market...

Verizon 31.3% and AT&T 26.6%... In what Universe is 58% not a majority?

Sprint is desperate to sell IPHONES because they bought so many up front from Apple. They sold 1.8 million last quarter...

Once Apple FINALLY cuts a deal with China Mobile.. The stock will pop 40-50 a share the day of the announcement.. or in the lead up to the imminent announcement.

148   MisdemeanorRebel   2013 Jan 25, 4:05am  

Kevin says

BoomAndBustCycle says

So on the two largest telcos in the U.S... 74% of all phones sold are IPHONES.. and Wall Street panic sells?

If only the two largest US carriers were the entire smartphone market. Or even the entire US market. Or even the majority of the US market...

Investors are making bets. They're betting that Apple's growth isn't sustainable. It's pretty simple, actually.

Android phones are far and away the dominant phone OS.

http://thenextweb.com/mobile/2012/11/01/android-grabs-75-0-market-share-in-q3-followed-by-14-9-for-ios-and-4-3-for-blackberry/

149   curious2   2013 Jan 25, 4:07am  

BoomAndBustCycle says

Once Apple FINALLY cuts a deal with China Mobile.

Why would China Mobile agree to overpay for a phone that they know perfectly well any 10-year-old can make?

150   BoomAndBustCycle   2013 Jan 25, 5:09am  

thunderlips11 says

Android phones are far and away the dominant phone OS.

http://thenextweb.com/mobile/2012/11/01/android-grabs-75-0-market-share-in-q3-followed-by-14-9-for-ios-and-4-3-for-blackberry/

So which is it.. Android is too big to grow anymore? Or Apple is too big to grow anymore.. these numbers all contradict.

151   BoomAndBustCycle   2013 Jan 25, 5:10am  

curious2 says

Why would China Mobile agree to overpay for a phone that they know perfectly well any 10-year-old can make?

Apple only needs to get the same deal that Samsung Galaxy has over at China Mobile... If they are both subsidized equally you can let the consumers decide... if Apple's IPHONE is worth a little extra cash.

152   zzyzzx   2013 Jan 25, 9:29am  

439.88/sh -10.62(2.36%) 4:00PM

153   nope   2013 Jan 25, 10:15am  

BoomAndBustCycle says

Kevin says

If only the two largest US carriers were the entire smartphone market. Or even the entire US market. Or even the majority of the US market...

Investors are making bets. They're betting that Apple's growth isn't sustainable. It's pretty simple, actually.

it is the majority of the US market...

Verizon 31.3% and AT&T 26.6%... In what Universe is 58% not a majority?

Sprint is desperate to sell IPHONES because they bought so many up front from Apple. They sold 1.8 million last quarter...

Once Apple FINALLY cuts a deal with China Mobile.. The stock will pop 40-50 a share the day of the announcement.. or in the lead up to the imminent announcement.

Those are percentages of post paid (contract) customers. Posy paid is only half of the market.

Quick, what's 58% of half of the market?

154   BoomAndBustCycle   2013 Jan 26, 9:33am  

Kevin says

Those are percentages of post paid (contract) customers. Posy paid is only half of the market.

Quick, what's 58% of half of the market?

Apple is priced as if it will only experience 2% year over year growth forever... I'd be first to agree $700 a share Apple was risky in the short term.. and deserved a pullback.

But it's current price is definitely blood in the streets fear-driven and overselling.

155   nope   2013 Jan 26, 4:31pm  

BoomAndBustCycle says

Kevin says

Those are percentages of post paid (contract) customers. Posy paid is only half of the market.

Quick, what's 58% of half of the market?

Apple is priced as if it will only experience 2% year over year growth forever... I'd be first to agree $700 a share Apple was risky in the short term.. and deserved a pullback.

But it's current price is definitely blood in the streets fear-driven and overselling.

Perhaps. The question is, what happens next? If you believe that Apple's fundamentals and future are sound, and that investors are just being short sighted and will eventually come around, by all means buy.

Just remember that there are plenty of companies doing very well that have had a stagnant stock price for a very long time.

I don't buy individual stocks unless they pay a dividend for just this reason. You're betting on perception.

156   bmwman91   2013 Jan 27, 8:33pm  

Holy shit am I glad that I am too much of a pussy to actually gamble on options. My friend that gave me that "hot tip" is going to get razzed next time we go grab beers!

Apple is not going anywhere. They are a long way off from becoming Microsoft per Kevin's earlier description, which sadly bears quite a bit of truth. Even if they did...well, MSFT is still alive. They (AAPL) make high quality hardware and their corporate culture still attracts top type-A talent, which will probably mean that they continue churning out top quality stuff. Popular sentiment toward them is shifting a little, but they still have legions of die-hard fans and brand-whore minions. Their margins are unreal for high volume consumer gadgetry, so if they ever did need to engage in a pricing battle, they have a LOT of room. I have no idea where their stock price is going, but they will remain highly profitable for quite some time I am sure.

It does seem that their stock price was blown up on expectations of unsustainable growth levels, even with their super conservative P/E. Maybe the price will keep going down, maybe it will go way up, maybe it will level off. It is hard to say since it is dependent on fickle consumer behavior and reactionary retail investors. Either way, I see Apple being consistently profitable for the near- to mid-term future.

157   zzyzzx   2013 Jan 27, 10:21pm  

$437.64/sh Down 2.24 (0.51%) 9:16AM EST - Nasdaq Real Time Price

158   david1   2013 Jan 27, 10:36pm  

Long AAPL @ $455. The P/E is 10 and dividend yield is over 2.3%.

The Cash value is $150 a share for Christ's sake.

What's going to happen, the P/E is going to 8?

Or 5?

Find any company with a cash value 35% of it share price that has a P/E of 10.

159   Tenpoundbass   2013 Jan 27, 11:43pm  

iPhone losing luster in Asia's trend-setting cities

http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2013/1/28/business/20130128080557&sec=business

In Hong Kong, devices running Apple's iOS now account for about 30 percent of the total, down from about 45 percent a year ago. Android accounts for nearly two-thirds.

161   Facebooksux   2013 Jan 28, 12:30am  

david1 says

The Cash value is $150 a share for Christ's sake.

No it's not. Read the article above.

162   zzyzzx   2013 Feb 1, 12:31am  

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/anlaysis-funds-saw-apples-decline-174717417.html

Analysis: The funds that saw Apple's decline coming

Whether it was a case of simple risk management, concerns that the company's share price had peaked, or a bit of luck, fund managers who drained Apple from their portfolios helped drive down the price of the stock. As a result of their early shift in sentiment, they appear quite prescient now.

Denver-based fund manager Tom Marsico sold his firm's entire stake in the company between November and January - most of it in November before things got really ugly. At about $2 billion of the firm's $31 billion in assets under management, the Apple stake made up between 6 to 8 percent of the domestic portfolios at the time he began selling.

His concern: that the company had saturated the market with its products so much that there was "no one left to sell to."

Marsico, the Denver-based manager, began selling his position in the company when it traded at around $650 per share out of concern that its years of phenomenal growth were over.

"We didn't see another major category that would provide the opportunity that the iPhone has had for the company," he said.

The company's strong lineup of current products didn't entice him to stay invested. "They've talked about the fact that they have the best products they've ever had. But I remember you could say the same thing about Sony 20 years ago," he said.

Some managers trimmed their overweight positions, but were held back from selling more because of the company's massive pile of cash. Daniel Rosenblatt, a portfolio manager of the $639 million Neuberger Berman Large Cap Disciplined Growth fund, began trimming his position in Apple by approximately 10 percent, from 8.1 percent of assets to 7.2 percent of assets, as the company approached its high. The company, which had been among the fund's largest positions since 2004, was "clearly in a deceleration mode", Rosenblatt said.

He was most troubled by surveys that showed that even die-hard Apple fans were more open to using rivals' products. "When a product loses a certain amount of cool, its pricing power falls," he said. Yet he won't short the stock or sell more because the company's large cash position, which makes up about a third of its market value, "could change the dynamics of the stock price overnight" via a big buy-back or acquisition, he said.

163   bmwman91   2013 Feb 7, 6:03am  

So, there's a potential game-changer coming for AAPL stock prices. Greenlight Capital is filing a suit against Apple for not doing enough to pump its share price, and apparently Apple is considering letting shareholders vote themselves into juicy shares of dividend-paying preferred stock. What will happen next is anyone's guess. Basically, they are under fire now to pump the shit out of their stock to appease shareholders, more so then ever. Time to make some popcorn...

165   anotheraccount   2013 Feb 13, 8:19am  

The biggest wildcard is the compression of margins. I just bought an iPad mini and Google Nexus 7. For many people it's becoming harder to justify to pay for a bigger iPad with more memory when you can get pretty much the same thing cheaper.

166   zzyzzx   2013 Mar 1, 4:26am  

AAPL down to $431.67/sh

167   Reality   2013 Mar 1, 4:52am  

The stock may be due for a bounce soon, but after that don't be surprise to see the stock reaching close to $200/share within a year's time or so.

I loved what Jobs did, but the stock is broken after what the hedge funds did to it in 2012 above the 460+ island ramp job to $700.

168   nope   2013 Mar 2, 2:30pm  

People spend billions on watches because a $10000 watch is a high end piece of jewelry. A $200-300 watch will never fit that category. You can't brag about the techie equivalent of a Timex.

Smart watches could be interesting, but it'll take a really killer app to make them shine.

169   bmwman91   2013 Mar 3, 7:03am  

http://getpebble.com/

Honest to god, this is a vastly superior product to what it sounds like Apple is making. Who the FUCK wants to charge their goddamn watch every day?! Surf the web on a 1" screen? Riiiiight. I am not saying that there won't be some amazing technology baked into an incredibly small package by Apple's iWatch, but it seems like a completely impractical gimmick.

170   MsBennet   2013 Mar 3, 2:35pm  

I was thinking about a month ago while driving down the freeway, what is Apple going to come up with next. First was the iPad, then the mini, and I thought what next. A computer watch?

I swear to God. It's true.

At that same time my next thought was the watch could project the display on a flat surface to enlarge it. Now, that will be weird if it comes true. You heard it here first. You are all my witnesses.

171   zzyzzx   2013 Mar 4, 12:50am  

MsBennet says

At that same time my next thought was the watch could project the display on a flat surface to enlarge it. Now, that will be weird if it comes true. You heard it here first. You are all my witnesses.

I'm pretty sure I have seen stuff like this on TV, maybe sci-fi, but I am not sure. Would then see people watching their porn on walls in public places then.

172   zzyzzx   2013 Mar 4, 2:10am  

Down to $422.91/sh

173   Done   2013 Mar 4, 2:28am  

Going to 350/sh (odds?)

174   evilmonkeyboy   2013 Mar 27, 11:22am  

bmwman91 says

Honest to god, this is a vastly superior product to what it sounds like Apple is making. Who the FUCK wants to charge their goddamn watch every day?! Surf the web on a 1" screen? Riiiiight. I am not saying that there won't be some amazing technology baked into an incredibly small package by Apple's iWatch, but it seems like a completely impractical gimmick.

I have to agree, I can not think of a scenario where I would buy a "smart watch".

175   zzyzzx   2013 Mar 27, 12:00pm  

evilmonkeyboy says

I have to agree, I can not think of a scenario where I would buy a "smart watch".

If the watch can project an image onto a wall for you to see, then maybe, but then other people would be hanging around to watch your porn.

176   Bellingham Bill   2013 Mar 27, 12:23pm  

evilmonkeyboy says

I have to agree, I can not think of a scenario where I would buy a "smart watch".

not some clunky-ass block of metal, no.

But back in the 1980s I had this really cool Armitron digital watch:

the cool thing about it was that it was REALLY thin, not much thicker than the band.

I'd love to have a smartwatch that talked to my other iOS and OS X devices via bluetooth.

My bud has a Leaf and its key fob is pretty cool (just put the fob in your pocket and you don't need a key for the car), I could see the watch getting that functionality too.

If I were to design the smartwatch, it'd be about as small and thin as possible, so I don't see a platform for 3rd party apps all that much, since the display would be too small for touch input.

Shouldn't cost too much, either.

One thing Apple could do is move the watch industry beyond 7 seg LCD technology, LOL

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven-segment_display

177   evilmonkeyboy   2013 Mar 27, 1:04pm  

My phone is great! It is a reasonable size, has a good size screen and is very funtional. There is no way a watch will replace my phone. To me it is a gimmick and I would not waste money on it.

178   evilmonkeyboy   2013 Mar 27, 1:16pm  

Bellingham Bill says

My bud has a Leaf and its key fob is pretty cool (just put the fob in your pocket and you don't need a key for the car), I could see the watch getting that functionality too.

First of all it would make a lot more sense to have this technology on your phone vs a watch.
Second, I doubt that apple wants to get any where near key fobs because it opens up a whole new can of worms with the issue of stolen cars. Plus, who wants to have to enter a password on their phone to unlock their car or have to worry about their watch being charged to get into their car.

179   Bellingham Bill   2013 Mar 27, 5:09pm  

evilmonkeyboy says

has a good size screen and is very funtional. There is no way a watch will replace my phone. To me it is a gimmick and I would not waste money on it.

I can see it being a 2nd touchscreen for your phone.

Combine it with an earpiece and you'd never have to take your phone out.

Plus in the future the smartwatch would have the cell radio so it'd be the phone, too.

Be cool if the band were the battery. Shit, I should patent that . . .

180   JodyChunder   2013 Mar 27, 5:24pm  

Be even cooler if more folks didn't feel the overwhelming "need" to have the internet with them at all times everywhere they went.

Besides, it could never rival my old Omega:

181   thomaswong.1986   2013 Mar 27, 7:49pm  

JodyChunder says

Be even cooler if more folks didn't feel the overwhelming "need" to have the internet with them at all times everywhere they went.

they are children... the need to burn money and then blame the "man" on why they are dirt poor at the end of the month..

oh well !

182   bmwman91   2013 Mar 28, 7:01am  

JodyChunder says

Be even cooler if more folks didn't feel the overwhelming "need" to have the internet with them at all times everywhere they went.

Amen brother.

183   MsBennet   2013 Mar 28, 5:41pm  

If I was a person who liked to short stocks, I would short Apple now. Samsung is coming out with a new phone that apparently is much better than the iPhone: Bigger screen, faster, removable battery, better screen clarity, etc. Apple is
442 right now.

184   bmwman91   2013 Mar 28, 6:31pm  

Hard to say MsBennet. Friends that worked there were all telling me to load up on calls during the last two quarterly earnings releases because AAPL was going to show solid revenue growth (thank god I didn't). Well, they did, and the market shat all over AAPL anyway. So, while there does look to be a case for buying puts on AAPL, it's just too damn volatile and high profile to try to make fundamental-based decisions on in the short term. EVERYONE is trying to game it, and while AAPL is a highly profitable company that isn't going out of business anytime soon, trying to cash in on options with it has worse odds than picking a color at the roulette table.

EDIT: I accidentally hit "Dislike" instead of "Edit". LOLZ

« First        Comments 145 - 184 of 241       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste