« First « Previous Comments 11 - 50 of 129 Next » Last » Search these comments
The problem with communism is that "to really screw things up requires a government".
Communism, taken to its perfected extreme, would look a lot like a library.
In the midwest, libraries actually lend out cakepans.
Pretty smart idea, huh? Instead of 100,000 households buying 100,000 cakepans they only use occasionally, just establish a community pool of resources that are sufficient for all to share.
That works in theory but the problems come in how to allocate scarcity.
People who pig out in one area should not be able to pig out as much in others, so we would need to introduce ration cards.
Then comes the problem of getting people to work. If people receive ration cards for not working, then no work will get done. So perhaps we should tie the receiving of ration cards with the work you do.
Squint your eyes enough and you'll see this is the economy we have now.
I'm a great believer in the power of decentralization and profit-seeking.
But to paraphrase, "honor those who seek profits, beware those who lock them in".
The right-libertarian thesis fails due to not understanding anything about the abusive power of market monopoly, especially in land and natural resources.
The left-libertarian thesis attempts to address this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-libertarianism
The Russians had a breath-taking chance ca 1990 to cleanly convert their moribund socialist economy (with little private property in natural resources) into a new georgist model.
They instead went for the crony-capitalist model, thereby screwing themselves.
The most successful economies on the planet are socialist in nature, at least in some areas.
This is a fact the righties refuse to understand. Kinda bizarre, actually, how much they lie about this.
Richest - wtf? We are the largest debtor nation in the entire human existence. The one good thing is we can still print and pay down the debt in our own currency. Screw the savers!
I'm sure if you examine most countries governments balance sheets, they would be in negative territory. While it's true the government is the largest debtor nation on earth and a good number of citizen's are as well, there is still a lot of wealth in this country. It's probably too heavily concentrated to a small segment of the population, but overall the United States has more billionaires than any other country. As for wealth per person, we rank 7th worldwide. Three of the countries that have wealthier citizens are Oil rich Arab countries, once there oil runs out, so do they. No diversified industry like the United States.
The worst part is in a communist society they have no need for God.
I think your confusing Communism with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), they were definitively NOT true communist society. The were communist in name not in practice. True communism does have a elite ruling class and all citizens pledge there alliance to only the State and nothing else. There no reason why "God" can't be part of a small communist community.
Then there's always that system where people always do the right thing, and care what the neighbors think. Their concern goes beyond scandal sentiment, it's more about avoiding getting your ass kicked in.
That's what all Societies could use more of these days. A good rabble of Ass Kickers doling out community justice.
I can only dream such a Mob is turning the corner now, to knock on Ben Bernake's door.
Excuse me, but this is a lame reason for rejecting a communist society. So what if there is no need for God? Why is faith a problem at all for existence of a society? Blind faith has caused many wars in human history.
Agreed, the crusades killed millions in the name of "God", Every times a terrorist blows themselves up in a crowded market place they scream, "God is Great". Thousands of witches were burned at the stake in Europe in the Name of God. The whole God thing is a dangerous thing.
I will admit, I go to a Christian Church with my Wife, but it's more of a community thing for me. My wife met a lot of local people and has more friends now where she felt isolated before. It's has been beneficial for us, but I really don't believe in what they teach. To blindly follow someone without questioning them leads to Waco or a bomb strapped to your chest in a crowded marketplace.
That's what all Societies could use more of these days. A good rabble of Ass Kickers doling out community justice.
I can only dream such a Mob is turning the corner now...
So the next step for the Occupy protesters is the torches and pitchfork protesters?
I think the original poster should go back and ask "what IS communism"?
Do you mean as practiced by the Soviet Union?
Do you mean as envisioned by Marx?
Do you mean as practiced by various other attempts at the same sort of idea from the smallest "commune" to other hybrids?
Most people can't get past "well I meant Soviet Communism, which obviously failed DUH therefore anything I think is communism is bad".
If there's a socio-economic experiment that has survived 100% intact as founded with no tweaks and "proved" it's superiority I don't know what it is.
By the standards of some friends of mine, the USA has not been a capitalist country since well it depends. For some it was the Civil War, for others the New Deal, and for them it's already a "failed experiment" and we are living in communism now.
Personally I've never read any Marx, it's on my short list after someone pointed out this deficiency.
I love all this talk about how MOTIVATION is enhanced under this or that system. It always sounds great when you are BS'ing around a campfire. Then you get some dude who says "yeah let's institute COPYRIGHT or PATENTS those will spur innovation!" and it all sounds good and works fine in the first few years, until next thing you know you've got a "Senator Disney" whose job is making sure The Mouse has eternal protection. Exactly what "motivation" does copyright give to an author who has been dead for decades to produce new work?
Yeah so to me a lot of capitalism is also theoretical BS about how it ought to be working, which isn't how things really work. Let me give you a simple example TIPPING. That should be a clear and simple example of the smell of money inevitably leads to great service right? BZZZT! I've had great service in countries where tipping is not customary. I've had lots of really crappy service in America, and shoudn't tipping have long ago weeded out bad service here and left only the well-rewarded perfect waitrons?
Frankly a lot of political and economic junk we've been indoctrinated with, doesn't survive 5 seconds of scrutiny.
The worst part is in a communist society they have no need for God. I can't imagine a life without my heavenly Father or one where I woud be punished for my faith.
Religion and faith are and always should be a personal issue, not a social or political one - otherwise there would be way too much room for abuse (such as in a theocracy), thus WE attempt to have the separation of church and state. That being said however, communism and religion (the need for a belief in some superstitious being, or god) are not necessarily mutually exclusive ideas as "Liberation Theology" clearly demonstrates - it is a Marxist interpretation of Christianity. So the idea that all forms of communism are godless or the idea that capitalism is endorsed by some religious faith or another, is simply not true - those are mish-mash ideological positions. These are all competing ideologies - some of them address the human condition from an economic standpoint, where others focus primarily on metaphysical issues such as faith, etc. - and the varying forms of these ideologies can be mixed and matched with vaious combinations and permutaions, none of them are static or fixed....
Yeah so to me a lot of capitalism is also theoretical BS about how it ought to be working, which isn't how things really work. Let me give you a simple example TIPPING. That should be a clear and simple example of the smell of money inevitably leads to great service right? BZZZT! I've had great service in countries where tipping is not customary. I've had lots of really crappy service in America, and shoudn't tipping have long ago weeded out bad service here and left only the well-rewarded perfect waitrons?
Frankly a lot of political and economic junk we've been indoctrinated with, doesn't survive 5 seconds of scrutiny.
That just about says it.
Some people do a damn good job not because of money, but because they enjoy the task, they're good at the task, enjoy helping people, like approval, or trying to please a substitute parent figure in hopes of praise, etc. etc. etc.
If you pay a dishwasher $20/hour it doesn't usually get things cleaner, faster.
Sadly he probably wont continue reading this but ...
Zachary, no offense intended here - I think you do not know what communism is.
You cannot take a country that purports to be communist and use their problems as blanket reflections of communism. Note that I am not an advocate for communist - just an advocate for informed, honest dialog.
Let me put it this way - they have elections in Iran. Is Iran our example for democracy? Please, no!
Soviet Union - Not communist. That was just the bedrock ... of their rationalization for the government policies. Just like democracy is used in Iran to legitimize leaders who really don't have the support of the people.
This is important because you have made a few inferences about communism, based upon your flawed examples, that have no bearing on the discussion. Trust me here, no one is arguing about 'what is wrong with the soviet union' - that's another topic entirely.
For instance - nowhere does it say that communists can't leave the country. Nor does communism preclude religion. So scratch those two points - though again I agree with your generally negative view of communism as a whole.
Additionally, you argue that 'socialist europe' is on the brink of failure, but fail to note that our own capitalist society is also on the brink. Our debt is monumental and could very well bring us to our knees (let's hope - or pray if you want - that it does not). Our wealth inequality far outshadows the level-of-effort inequality - the richest in our nation, for the most part, are NOT people who got where they are from hard work ... so while it is true that the laziest usually fail, the hardest working merely thrive - but do not reach the top. Instead, we have a class of very lazy leaches who occupy the top tier of our society.
Additionally, our wealth inequality has allowed the fundamental precept of equality in our society to be undermined. No one believes anymore than everyone has an equal say. Your opinions, or mine, have little effect on the world. Rupert Murdochs opinions can literally dictate politics to a large degree.
These points about our country do *not* reflect directly on the idea of capitalism, by the way - we could easily fix these things, with the political will. Sadly it's too easy for people with good ideas to post on the internet, then go to work for the remainder of the day, when perhaps we should post on the internet and join a strike or start a peaceful revolution.
funny ... this arguement is taking place on a form of media, using a huge series of infrastructures, with folks exersizing complete personal freedom .... how many of those things exist under communism?
Inventions and the systems they create, like electricity, PC's, Operating systems, cell systems, cable systems, are all born in freedom ... and a desire to earn money with them (capitalism) .... and your ability to sit there and express your thoughts, at your desired time, in your desired way .... these are all non-communist things.
In my most humbel opinion, communisim is a GREAT idea for anyone who has never had an original thought, has no personality, and has never been the winner at anything. It's the losers' choice. Hey ,,... that should be the progressive/liberal/leftis/communist slogan while trying to give us more Lord Barry .... "Obama, the loser's choice!"
All humans do not work the same, learn the same, look the same, function the same, are not born in the same place, are not born at the same time, are born to good parents .... no two humans have the same life experience. So, trying to have all humans have matching outcomes in life is stupid. Especially when the function used to create an even outcome is a forced wealth redistribution enacted by a select group of elite humans.
Reverencing the uncommon "elite", to then allow them to create common "equality" for all of the non-elite, is complete silliness.
It ain't the concept of Capitalism or Communism, it's how it gets implemented. We humans tend to fuck things up, give someone too much power not realizing the consequences, make irrational decisions, and get overly greedy trying to screw each other for profit.
In short some form of "moral communism" can work on small scales - but it breaks down when applied to larger society
Basically.
Economic systems are like underwear. You change them when you need to.
Communism, when implemented correctly as opposed to the tyrannical Soviet implementation, is a perfectly fine economic model for some situations. I can think of two perfect examples off the top of my head.
First, if I were to implement an economic model for a self-sufficient, autonomous, deep-space research facility, I'd go with communism. The facility has to balance resource acquisition in the form of asteroid mining, energy management, repair and maintenance, and consumption in the form of running various physical, chemical, and biological experiments on behalf of the humans back on Earth.
This is a sufficiently complex economy, and it would be best managed by communism. A central program would run all aspects of the facilities economy taking into account the importance and urgency of various experiments as communicated by the far distant humans as well as all the other needs of the facility.
This form of communism could scale indefinitely since no humans are involved in the economy other than stating preferences for experiments. Remove the humans from an economy, and communism can scale indefinitely.
The second example I can think of for communism is a stage 4 zombie outbreak where the undead roam freely and the living struggle to survive in small groups.
In this scenario, obviously Communism is the economic model you want your small group of 5-20 survivors to follow. Democratic Communism is preferred if your group is composed of intelligent, rational people. But if they're all Americans, you're probably out of luck.
As your base grows to over a hundred people, Communism becomes less effective for two reasons. First, centralized control becomes less efficient and responsive. Second, people experience fewer long-term interactions with everyone else and more short-term interactions. This causes people to behave more selfishly, and therefore not work well under Communism. So as your base grows, you need to transition to other economic models. Hopefully by then, your defenses are sufficient to hold off a large horde of the undead.
The worst part is in a communist society they have no need for God
You do realize that Jesus was a communist? The whole of Christianity is based on the premise that we should all act like a communist. You're suppose to use the gifts that god gave you to the best of your ability and then share the fruits of those labors with the least of your neighbors for "that which you do unto the least of your people, you do unto me (Jesus)". The entire point of Christianity was to answer the question, "Am I my brother's keeper?" with a resounding "Yes!".
we all need God. We need God because God is love.
I think you're confusing god with dog.
dog = love
god = evol
I'll take a dog over a god any day.
Zachary says
The worst part is in a communist society they have no need for God.
I think your confusing Communism with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), they were definitively NOT true communist society.
So true, and many people make this mistake. All one has to do is look to Cuba as a counterexample. Cuba is communistic and religious. Not that I advocate either, but they certainly are not mutually exclusive.
APOCALYPSEFUCK is Tony Manero says
Communist governments end up machine gunning most of the population to death, at least those who have been able to find enough food to revolt.
And if only this wasn't also true for Capitalistic governments. Fascism is the capitalistic equivalent of Communistic tyranny. In practice, there is little different to these supposed polar opposites.
eorge Carlin was a genius.
Indeed, a very interesting one at that.
One of my favorite videos of Carlin is his interview and thoughts on drugs:
http://www.youtube.com/embed/oj5Sd3BRm_I
My favorite quote is:
"It is important in life that you don't give a shit. It can help you a lot".
You do realize that Jesus was a communist?
AND he became a zombie. Your 2 posts dovetail nicely.
What if zombies will actually be dead risen to bring us love and salvation? Everyone assumes they are always going to start munching brains.
Democratic Communism is preferred if your group is composed of intelligent, rational people. But if they're all Americans, you're probably out of luck.
As your base grows to over a hundred people, Communism becomes less effective for two reasons. First, centralized control becomes less efficient and responsive. Second, people experience fewer long-term interactions with everyone else and more short-term interactions. This causes people to behave more selfishly, and therefore not work well under Communism.
Political systems grow, ossify and die. So I don't see that Communism is unique here. There have been dynasty chains that stretched far longer than our Western fads. Several thousand years from now some Chinese historian may be writing a chapter about all the short-lived "Republic" experiments which "obviously" were inferior, because hey look they all fell eventually and were replaced by something else.
One of my favorite videos of Carlin is his interview and thoughts on drugs:
Holy crap, Jon Stewart looks young in that clip. George Carlin looks like he didn't age for the last 20 years of his life.
For some reason, the video embedding isn't working for me anymore. If I type in the following, the site just strips away that text:
<iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/6RT6rL2UroE" frameborder="0" height="375" width="500"></iframe>
Even if I just quote someone who's added that text.
One of my favorite videos of Carlin is his interview and thoughts on drugs:
Thanks for this!
Jesus is the God of the Communists, Capitalists, Socialists, Atheists, etc. Even George Carlin today now believes in the Son of God who is the only person to rise from the dead.
By many of your comments and attacks regarding my faith, it only reinforces why communism is anti-God. Look in the mirror!
Jesus Christ died for your sins, he suffered a horrible death for YOUR sins. He stands ready to forgive you and provide a way of escape. Think wisely before you mock me, because by your written words you will be judged on judgment day...of course, he will still forgive you on your death bed if you;re fortunate enough to come to your senses.
God bless you and have mercy on you.
Z
Even George Carlin today now believes in the Son of God who is the only person to rise from the dead.
did you even see the video, 'religion is bullshit'? He says there is no God, none whatsoever, has never been.
Jesus is the God of the Communists, Capitalists, Socialists, Atheists, etc.
wow, what an arrogant myopic view of the world! You know there are large sections of the world where Jesus is NOT GOD right? In Hinduism, there are 1000s of Gods, not one. Apart from this, there are Buddhists, Jainists etc. Quite arrogant to ignore large sections of populace who don't believe/care about Jesus.
By many of your comments and attacks regarding my faith
we're not attacking your faith per se, what is there to attack on blind faith? we're presenting facts, plain and simple. whether you face to see the facts or not is up to you.
As for the rest of your rant on sins and forgiving, cool - we can wait for judgment day. Until then I'll be watching funny videos like this:
COMMUNISM; Where a wall is built to keep people in ?
POLITICS & RELIGION; Which one requires faith ?
George Carlin today now believes in the Son of God who is the only person to rise from the dead.
Technically this isn't true. Bringing people back for the dead (ie no heartbeat) is almost a daily occurrence in a hospitals and by an EMT teams somewhere on the world. People have "died" and been brought back from the dead. You know all those white light stories.
George Carlin today now believes in the Son of God who is the only person to rise from the dead.
Technically this isn't true. Bringing people back for the dead (ie no heartbeat) is almost a daily occurrence in a hospitals and by an EMT teams somewhere on the world. People have "died" and been brought back from the dead. You know all those white light stories.
Jesus Christ died for your sins,... blah blah blah
The whole problem with this is there no evidence he ever existed, period. The Romans kept very accurate records and no where in the archives is there any mention of of such a person ever existing. While there was hardly documentation for every person who existed, important events were recorded, kings, princes, wars, people getting people to follow them where they would cause potential problems for the government, etc.
The entire issue here is you believe every word in a book as undisputed Fact. Even when there is hard scientific evidence to say otherwise. The bible says something like the earth is 6,000 years old, which has been clearly proven false. If the bible stated facts that they couldn't possibly know at that time, it would give it a lot more credibility.
For example if the bible said in the beginning God created the earth and populated it with huge monsters (dinosaurs) but they were deemed unworthy so god hurdled a rock from the heavens to destroy them and started again with Man. That would make me a believer, but blindly believing in a book written thousands of years ago will not. Don't get me wrong, the bible has value, there are morals set down in the bible that have been beneficial to humankind, but I will never accept everything written in it as undisputed facts.
Jesus Christ died for your sins, he suffered a horrible death for YOUR sins.
Pictures or it didn't happen.
COMMUNISM; Where a wall is built to keep people in ?
Walls are not unique to communism, they are common to any repressive regime. Feudalism liked walls too. Of course building a wall is expensive and symbolic, simply issuing a death penalty was preferred for anyone suspected of not being a "patriot".
simply issuing a death penalty was preferred for anyone suspected of not being a "patriot".
Are you referring to McCain's new bill ?
Jesus Christ died for your sins, he suffered a horrible death for YOUR sins.
A distraught mother listened on a mobile phone as her teenage daughter was eaten alive by a brown bear and its three cubs.
Olga Moskalyova, 19, gave an horrific hour-long running commentary on her own death in three separate calls as the wild animals mauled her.
She screamed: 'Mum, the bear is eating me! Mum, it’s such agony. Mum, help!'
In a second call, a weak Olga gasped: 'Mum, the bears are back. She came back and brought her three babies. They’re... eating me.'
I'd be more impressed by Jesus if he died to prevent bear attacks from ever happening again.
Seriously, the story of Jesus dying for our sins is just plain fucking retarded. It makes no sense whatsoever. Why did his death absolve mankind from any sins? What did it accomplish? It didn't stop man from committing atrocities.
And what kind of dumb ass does Jesus have to be in order to live a life that resulted in hundreds of millions of people being murdered in his name? For someone who's omniscient, he sure didn't foresee the Crusades, the Holocausts, the Inquisition. If Jesus's intention was to bring mankind closer to god and peaceful coexistence by dying, then he failed miserably. Epic fail.
Jesus's death did not make the world one iota better. If anything, it made the world worse by giving assholes a license to steal, rape, and murder for twenty centuries.
And he didn't even lift a ghostly finger to prevent that poor woman from being eaten alive by bears and enduring a horrific and painful death. If he wanted that innocent girl to die so bad, he could at least chosen a quicker and more humane method like death by meteor. Oh, but god works in mysterious ways. What a cop out.
Also, all the myths about Jesus were plagiarized from earlier myths, particularly Horus. This case is best made by the following clip from the movie Religulous.
Talk about major plagiarism. The authors of the Bible should get a big, fat F for that alone! We should ban sales of the Bible for violations of Intellectual Property Laws! Evidently, "Thou shalt not steal" doesn't apply to creative works.
Well, to beat this dead horse some more...
Here is an excellent video that shows how Judaism and Christianity are complete rip-offs of much earlier Egyptian religion and mythology.
Oh, that horse is dead.
This horse is far from dead...
I feel bad that you aren't open to the truth. Tell me, if you are willing to be objective for just 60 seconds, what's wrong with the 10 Commandments and if folks adhered to them that all of society would be better off?
The Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:2-17 NKJV)
1. “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before Me.
2. “You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me, but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My Commandments.
3. “You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes His name in vain.
4. “Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord your God. In it you shall do no work: you, nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your male servant, nor your female servant, nor your cattle, nor your stranger who is within your gates. For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it.
5. “Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long upon the land which the Lord your God is giving you.
6. “You shall not murder.
7. “You shall not commit adultery.
8. “You shall not steal.
9. “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
10. “You shall not covet your neighbor's house; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor's.â€
Matthew 22:36-40
36 “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?â€
37 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’[a] 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[b] 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.â€
Zachay: If you love God and love your neighbor as yourself, you will keep allof the above commandments.
There's nothing wrong with living a better life. By the way, Jesus was dead for 3 days and was raised up, then never died again. While dead, he went to hades and took back the keys of eternal life from satan. So in Him, we have access to heaven. he took our sins to hell and won the battle for our souls. If we confess our sins, and believe in our hearts that Jesus Chris is Lord, we shall receive fogiveness and eternal life.
All of the others who came back from the dead, died again, or will die. Jesus is God, is alive, and join me in praising His Holy name.
This horse is far from dead...
LOL sure.
You shall have no other gods before Me.
Woah, No. 1 is dead wrong. It is an axiomatic-type belief. I shall have 330 million gods before you, says the Hindu. Who is this Father figure who tells us that he is God and no one else is? Why the heck should I believe this blindness?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_deities
“You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them.
WTF? Sculptures have been there for much longer than even the birth of Jesus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_art_history
Who are you to tell that there should be no carved images? History shows that humans have a clear inclination towards art and sculptures are one way to express their art.
You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes His name in vain.
yeah right, don't ask any questions -- just blindly believe.
For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it.
Oh dear, Earth is 4.54 billion years old. Not only Jesus, any person cannot contest this simple fact. It is well established, beyond any doubt.
The Sabbath statement is the most contradictory of all to science.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_earth
#5 is a personal preference. There are many instances where the father or the mother of a child could be harmful. How can a child be expected to honor them then?
#6,7,8,9,10 are basically individual or private property rights. You don't need the commandments to tell that you have to honor those rights. A simple constitutional law would do.
There's nothing wrong with living a better life. By the way, Jesus was dead for 3 days and was raised up, then never died again. While dead, he went to hades and took back the keys of eternal life from satan. So in Him, we have access to heaven. he took our sins to hell and won the battle for our souls. If we confess our sins, and believe in our hearts that Jesus Chris is Lord, we shall receive fogiveness and eternal life.
All of the others who came back from the dead, died again, or will die. Jesus is God, is alive, and join me in praising His Holy name.
The above statements can be summarized in 3 words. Blah Blah Blah
Zachay: If you love God and love your neighbor as yourself, you will keep all of the above commandments.
ALL of the commandments. The law includes ALL of what is written in the Pentateuch, including not fornicating with menstruating women, eating no pork or shellfish, etc. NOT just the ten commandments.
Naturally, Christians have 'picked and chosen' what parts of the Bible they are going to obey (working on Saturday/Sunday) and what parts they are going to ignore (eating shrimp at Red Lobster).
The Ten Commandments aren't the sum of all laws. Here's a few more laws from Exodus that follow the ten commandments:
30:34 And the LORD said unto Moses, Take unto thee sweet spices, stacte, and onycha, and galbanum; these sweet spices with pure frankincense: of each shall there be a like weight:
30:35 And thou shalt make it a perfume, a confection after the art of the apothecary, tempered together, pure and holy:
30:36 And thou shalt beat some of it very small, and put of it before the testimony in the tabernacle of the congregation, where I will meet with thee: it shall be unto you most holy.
30:37 And as for the perfume which thou shalt make, ye shall not make to yourselves according to the composition thereof: it shall be unto thee holy for the LORD.
30:38 Whosoever shall make like unto that, to smell thereto, shall even be cut off from his people.
Don't use God's favorite perfume, or you'll be exiled/excommunicated.
Exodus 21:10 If he take him another wife; her food, her raiment, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish.
Another wife? Then laws against polygamy are against God's Will, who permits multiple wives for a man.
Exodus 22:18 Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.
Who is a witch? How do we know a witch when we see one? Do we really have to murder Rainbow Moonbeam, the happy hippy chick at the Swap Meet who sells incense and candles?
Exodus 22:28 Thou shalt not revile the gods, nor curse the ruler of thy people.
The Gods? There is more than one? Apparently there are:
Exodus 23:13 And in all things that I have said unto you be circumspect: and make no mention of the name of other gods, neither let it be heard out of thy mouth.
Not "No other Gods exist" just "Make no mention of the name of other gods"
There are plenty of others throughout Exodus and the Pentateuch. Few, thank God, are obeyed.
10. “You shall not covet your neighbor's house; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor's.â€
BTW, note that servants, oxes, donkeys and wives are all considered property here.
The Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:2-17 NKJV)
1. “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before Me.
I'm not Jewish, nor was any of my ancestors Jewish. Never been to Egypt, nor have any of my ancestors, Really doesn't apply to me personally.
2. “You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me, but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My Commandments.
3. “You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes His name in vain.
Since we established #1 doesn’t apply to me, why should #2 or #3? Or even 4 for that matter.
6. “You shall not murder.
7. “You shall not commit adultery.
8. “You shall not steal.
9. “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
These are perfect examples of teachings within the bible that certainly had benefits to developing societies in the past and perhaps in the future.
10. “You shall not covet your neighbor's house; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor's.â€
“…you shall not covet your neighbor's wifeâ€, kinda of redundant there, doesn’t number 7 cover this? I guess cheating spouses was just a problem then as it is in modern society today.
By the way, Jesus was dead for 3 days and was raised up, then never died again.
Yea, I been meaning to ask about this. If he risen from the dead, where he go after? Felt it was time for a long deserved vacation to Las Vegas? Why not say to the Roman’s, “Hey you can’t kill me, I’m still here.†And go on preaching. Until the Roman’s Crucified him again that is. Of course the Romans were resourceful, if you can’t kill him one way, let’s try something else.
« First « Previous Comments 11 - 50 of 129 Next » Last » Search these comments
OK - I'm ready to get skewered for even posting this one...
A long long time ago (I think i was in High School, perhaps even middle school) I wrote a paper on communism. I've always felt that the system has certain merits when applied to small groupings, but begins to break down when applied to larger society. Further - said breakdown is partially due to the fact that there is nothing to keep those tasked with distributing the goods amongst the people from taking a disproportionate share for themselves, particularly in the absence or a strong moral framework or religious underpinning to keep everyone on the same plane. Lets face it - human nature is to horde - to consume more, more more. There is no natural inclination to help others unless there is a perceived benefit (be it current or future) in doing so.
In short some form of "moral communism" can work on small scales - but it breaks down when applied to larger society. Why? and could some tweaks allow one to come up with a "better" system, perhaps one that can be a viable alternative to the representative democracy we have in place now?