patrick.net

https://x.com/AMAZlNGNATURE/status/1800263112764854369

https://x.com/ramblingsloa/status/1800407640008204413

https://x.com/TheFigen%20/status/1800223297256489410

I don't know why Rico didn't choose the hottest of the two; but, my guess is opportunity is the difference.

The_Deplorable says

https://x.com/_B___S/status/1800317874495779229

When our Pomeranians were alive, the female would regularly run at the male and butt the food out of his mouth and she would eat it. Male female relations being what they are and 'female privilege', he would just look baffled and let her get away with it. It was hilarious to watch. She'd see something she liked in his mouth and would take off like a spring loaded launch missile.

UkraineIsTotallyFucked says

This is why God invented the mé·nage à trois.

clambo says

I don't know why Rico didn't choose the hottest of the two; but, my guess is opportunity is the difference.

Carmen may have been the hotter of the two, but Dizzy was the one that actually loved him.

Verhoeven said that test audiences HATED Carmen. They ended up cutting scenes with her being a slutty bitch. Especially with her and the other guy.

Test audiences who disliked Carmen must be fags or need glasses 🤓

So they could be connected!

UkraineIsTotallyFucked says

Carmen may have been the hotter of the two, but Dizzy was the one that actually loved him.

I don't know why, but Denise Richards holds scarce appeal for me. She looks like every empty headed, vain cheerleader rolled into one. I might bang the muffalata under an assumed name and bail, but that would be about it.

I do feel sorry for her with the Charlie Sheen fiasco, though, where she showed some character.

Didn't hit an ice berg, fake history, but we get the message.

Good job, Rockefellers!

These members of the CIA are undeclared enemy combatants.

Ceffer says

Good job, Rockefellers!

WTF is that pedo on cancer.org for?

Ceffer says

Good job, Rockefellers!

Twitter was saying those numbers were wrong. I haven't checked myself. Not that I doubt there was a cancer spike.

Stout says

Twitter was saying those numbers were wrong. I haven't checked myself. Not that I doubt there was a cancer spike.

I imagine most 'statistics' at some level are phony these days and amount to whatever publicity the originators are seeking rather than a numerical reflection some reality. It's a symptom of social corruption and degeneracy.

A neighbor who was vaxxed (she had breast cancer 15 years ago and was considered clear) had a recurrence after a year post vax (the vax made her very ill to begin with and she did not boost). She said her doctor's office was swarmed with women whose breast cancers had recurred after vax, some of them she had known when she had her original treatment. She said it made it seem as if every woman was getting breast cancer all of the sudden.

She had the breast removed, but refused chemo and radiation. So far almost a year later no news that she has any more, but her lymph nodes were negative.

Anecdotal, but boots on the ground are often more informative than official fig leafs.

Stout says

Twitter was saying those numbers were wrong. I haven't checked myself. Not that I doubt there was a cancer spike.

Did the fact checkers post the right numbers? Or did they just say "MISINFO!"?

Just the first minute...