patrick.net

Watch out Tea Party Patriots!

NO LIBERALS ? NO CONSERVATIVISTSSS ? IMAGINE ! NO Yin or Yan !
The more governing we aks for, the MORE we be GOVERNED !
Jesse Ventura mentions "Political Parties will destroy this country".
He was reciting a few of our most entrusted American forefathers.
I was expecting "soylent green" to be gubmints solution, but they will become more heinous in their scare tactic attempts to secure their own employment.

TMAC54 says

NO LIBERALS ? NO CONSERVATIVISTSSS ? IMAGINE ! NO Yin or Yan !
The more governing we aks for

Liberals aren't asking for more government and conservatives aren't asking for less.

Liberals want liberty, i.e., government not to interfere with our rights and freedom. You know, like the TSA strip searching people, cops preventing people from video recording their actions, etc.

To a liberal, the government serves only one purpose: to protect rights. Now that includes property rights, which includes public property rights such as environmental protection. And protecting our rights means protecting us from crime including white-collar corporate crimes which steal our life savings. But basic law enforcement is hardly big government.

Honest Abe says

be afraid of people who desire freedom and liberty

Those who betray or subvert the Constitution are guilty of sedition and/or treason, are domestic enemies and should and will be punished accordingly.

It also stands to reason that anyone who sympathizes with the enemy or gives aid or comfort to said enemy is likewise guilty. I have sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic and I will. And I will because not only did I swear to, but I believe in what it stands for in every bit of my heart, soul and being.

I know in my heart that I am right in my struggle, Steve. I have come to peace with myself, my God and my cause. Blood will flow in the streets, Steve. Good vs. Evil. Free Men vs. Socialist Wannabe Slaves. Pray it is not your blood, my friend.

Timothy McVeigh

Maybe there are some liberty lovers we should be just a little afraid of.

Dan8267 says

puppy sleeper cells

Whoever disliked the puppy post has no soul.

http://www.infowars.com/spy-drone-buzzes-journalists-secluded-home/

More actions by the real terrorists.

I would consider that much more of a terrorist act or activitry than putting a "Ron Paul" bumper sticker on my car.

Big Brother is watching and creeping tyrannty is happening right under your nose - but you either deny it...or support it.

But it's all for the collective good, right comrade? BTW, are you having cabbage soup for dinner, again?

http://www.infowars.com/homeland-security-report-lists-liberty-lovers-as-terrorists/

Well, we finally (partially) agree on something. DHS (Big Brother) lists liberty lovers as terrorists. Whats a liberty lover? A Ron Paul Supporter, a Tea Party Member, one who believes in the rule of law and the constitution, those who believe in limited government, limited taxes and limited intrusion in their business and personal lives - subject to "common sense" rules, laws and regulations. Liberty lovers disavow the concpet of tearing down the rich to lift the poor, they believe in personal responsibility, and they believe in sound money (which is coincidentially a limiting factor on war). I could continue but you get the picture, right?

Not to worry. The House of Republicans will stop all funding for the invasion of privacy because they love Merica.

Not just following right wing groups... but also Food Not Bombs and Indymedia

"Any definition of terrorism that would include someone throwing a bottle or rock through a window during an antiwar demonstration is dangerously overbroad," ACLU staff attorney Ben Wizner said. "The FBI will have its hands full pursuing antiwar groups instead of truly dangerous organizations."

ACLU attorneys say most violence during demonstrations is minor and is better handled by local police than federal counterterrorism agents. They say the FBI, which spied on antiwar and civil rights leaders during the 1960s, appears to be investigating activists solely for opposing the government.

"They don't know where Osama bin Laden is, but they're spending money watching people like me," said environmental activist Kirsten Atkins. Her license plate number showed up in an FBI terrorism file after she attended a protest against the lumber industry in Colorado Springs in 2002.

ACLU attorneys acknowledge that the FBI memos are heavily redacted and contain incomplete portraits of some cases. Still, the attorneys say, the documents show that the FBI has monitored groups that were not suspected of any crime.

"It certainly seems they're casting a net much more widely than would be necessary to thwart something like the blowing up of the Oklahoma City federal building," said Mark Silverstein, legal director of the ACLU of Colorado.

FBI officials respond that there is nothing improper about agents attending a meeting or demonstration.

"We have to be able to go out and look at things; we have to be able to conduct an investigation," said William J. Crowley, a spokesman for the FBI in Pittsburgh. His field office filed a report — released by the ACLU this month — in which an agent described photographing Pittsburgh activists who were handing out fliers for a war protest. The report mentioned no potential violence or crimes.

Crowley said his office had been looking for a certain person in that case and had closed the file when it realized the suspect was not among those handing out the leaflets.

The murky connection that the federal government makes between some left-wing activist groups and terrorism was illustrated in a Justice Department presentation to a college law class this month.

An FBI counterterrorism official showed the class, at the University of Texas in Austin, 35 slides listing militia, neo-Nazi and Islamist groups. Senior Special Agent Charles Rasner said one slide, labeled "Anarchism," was a federal analyst's list of groups that people intent on terrorism might associate with.

The list included Food Not Bombs, which mainly serves vegetarian food to homeless people, and — with a question mark next to it — Indymedia, a collective that publishes what it calls radical journalism online. Both groups are among the numerous organizations affiliated with anarchists and anti-globalization protests, where there has been some violence.

What's interesting is that all these lone nut attacks (or partner nuts like these guys or the DC shooter) are NOT part of a group much less acting under their auspices.

There hasn't been left wing violence in the US since the 80s.

thunderlips11 says

There hasn't been left wing violence in the US since the 80s.

What about the gay rights activist that shot up the Family Research Council carrying bags of Chick Fillet?
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/gunman-carrying-chick-fil-bag-injures-dc-guard-family-research-council-17017547

What about the 5 Occupy Wall Street morons that got arrested for trying to blow up a bridge in Cleveland?
http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2012/05/bridge_bomb_plot_suspects_were.html

What about the environmental activist that took hostages at the Discovery Channel?
http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/09/01/maryland.discovery.channel/

socal2 says

What about the gay rights activist that shot up the Family Research Council carrying bags of Chick Fillet?

Lone Nut.

socal2 says

What about the environmental activist that took hostages at the Discovery Channel?

Lone Nut.socal2 says

What about the 5 Occupy Wall Street morons that got arrested for trying to blow up a bridge in Cleveland?

http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2012/05/bridge_bomb_plot_suspects_were.html

Acting by themselves, not part of Occupy. More than two, so they're the exception that proves the rule -- plus the usual egging on by FBI informants rubbish, which is why they got a light sentence.