« First « Previous Comments 108 - 117 of 117 Search these comments
Why would anyone want to be in a protected profession? How interesting will that be? Isn't it better to take risks? Unless you intended to become a Nietzschean Last Man.
Pete I can tell you've never worked in Corporate America. ;-)
You think Big Government is corrupt? It is for sure, but so is Big Business.
Then again at least most of us don't have the specter of pestilence, plague, famine or domestic war hovering over as our ancestors did.
Many of our ancestors died in childhood or as infants.
I envy them. ;-)
Then again at least most of us don't have the specter of pestilence, plague, famine or domestic war hovering over as our ancestors did.
Many of our ancestors died in childhood or as infants.
I envy them. ;-)
Liar!
No-one's ancestor has EVER died as an infant or in childhood
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ancestor
:)
Of course those unfortunate children and infants are no-one's ancestors.
Good point. I guess I didn't mean "literal" ancestors.
Then again at least most of us don't have the specter of pestilence, plague, famine or domestic war hovering over as our ancestors did.
Many of our ancestors died in childhood or as infants.
I envy them. ;-)
Liar!
No-one's ancestor has EVER died as an infant or in childhood
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ancestor
:)
Aw damn, I was hoping to sneak my edit in before you could see my reply
Pete I can tell you've never worked in Corporate America. ;-)
I have worked in Corporate America. That was when I discover the hilarity of humanity. :-)
I have worked in Corporate America. That was when I discover the hilarity of humanity. :-)
Pete, it's one thing to watch Monty Python, it's another to live in it and depend upon it for food and shelter.
Pete, it's one thing to watch Monty Python, it's another to live in it and depend upon it for food and shelter.
Exactly.
Rin says
Pete, it's one thing to watch Monty Python, it's another to live in it and depend upon it for food and shelter.
Exactly.
Is this one of the few threads, where there's actually a type of consensus, despite slight differences in opinions or viewpoints?
« First « Previous Comments 108 - 117 of 117 Search these comments
Here's the problem: any work reducible to equations and computer-aided-design can be automated or outsourced thanks to computers and the internet.
Unless you're doing original research or engineering something that is inherently "on site" (like bridge construction), the future of American science and engineering looks pretty bleak. I think the claimed "shortage" of scientists and engineers in America is propaganda.
Remember, a lot of the political emphasis on "math and science" came from the Cold War (the nuclear arms race and the space race). The Cold War is over.
I guess there are still good jobs developing predator drones.
When it comes to the private sector, how many companies are willing to take on the high-risk, high-reward task of R&D? Warren Buffett famously does not usually invest in technology companies for that very reason.