0
0

How long will supply be constricted?


               
2012 Oct 18, 4:28pm   14,677 views  32 comments

by 033   follow (0)  

Foreclosures are 80 percent down, six SFRS are being offered in the neighborhood. Only 2 are short. Prices are up 10-15 percent year to year.

When do you see inventory increasing?

#housing

Comments 1 - 18 of 32       Last »     Search these comments

1   Eman   @   2012 Oct 18, 4:53pm  

Not much supply in the next 4-6 months. Notice of default is down 50% YoY, and last year NOD was also low due to the robo-signing scandal. Real estate agent will be hurting in the next 6 months. How do you buy or sell when there is no inventory. :)

Sean O'Toole of Foreclosureradar mentioned that there will not ba a wave of foreclosures since late 2009. People were skeptical of his comment, but it turns out Sean has been right 3 years in a row. Sean recently stated that the housing inventory will remain low for the foreseeable future. It's good if you got in housing market in the last couple of years.

You can make a lot of money if you know when the housing inventory will be increased. :)

2   033   @   2012 Oct 18, 5:08pm  

Next year, people will be getting 1099's for discharged debt again, lowering their likelihood to sell.
I suspect that the supply constriction will be sustained until sale values will approach the senior loan debt, and perhaps to the point where the second is in the money.
At that point, more NODs will go out, fueling short-sale propositions.
Increases in inventory tend to depress prices, as do higher interest rates. Being able to take advantage of either would be profitable.

3   PockyClipsNow   @   2012 Oct 19, 3:32am  

There will be tight inventory for a long time, everyone can see that.
Its Obamas plan to 'put a floor under house prices' (exact quote) and he has succeeded.

Democrats rejoice! Your guy is doing what he said he would.
Yay high house prices, go, go, go! /sarcasm

4   gregpfielding   @   2012 Oct 19, 3:49am  

War says

There are 20-30 MILLION excess empty houses in the US today.

I thought there were only 50+ million housing units total.... or not too many more than that. Though I guess it's got to me more for 300 million people.

Anyone know the correct number?

5   Shaman   @   2012 Oct 19, 3:59am  

GregFielding says, "I thought there were only 50+ million housing units total.... or not too many more than that. Though I guess it's got to me more for 300 million people."

Given approximately 400 million people in the US, 50 million housing units (assuming apartments and condos count individually) would mean that an average of eight people live in each American house. Personally I don't know anyone with a household that size, so even if you count all the immigrants living six families to a garage, the math still doesn't work. Not unless there's a ton of people living in caves or under bridges.
A lot of people live one or two people to a unit. Figure 60million kids, leaves 340 million adults at say 2 or 3 per unit, gives us 115-170 million units just to meet demand.

6   Shaman   @   2012 Oct 19, 4:02am  

War says, "130 MILLION houses in the US today..... and growing."

Assuming that number is correct, then at my lower number of 115million needed to meet demand, we have 15 million "excess" housing units.

7   Bigsby   @   2012 Oct 20, 3:02am  

War says

Quigley says

War says, "130 MILLION houses in the US today..... and growing."

Assuming that number is correct, then at my lower number of 115million needed to meet demand, we have 15 million "excess" housing units.

Census Bureau shows 20-30 MILLION excess empty housing units.

Just take a drive around and look. Empty houses everywhere.

And I suppose you have a link for that particular piece of 'data'. Quite the figure. And quite the range.

8   Shaman   @   2012 Oct 20, 3:08am  

Bigsby you are such a troll.
This site is for people who are trying to figure out the housing market and make wise financial decisions. Not for people who just come and make snarky comments without any possible redeeming value. If you have any actual information or any reasonable speculation even to share, then please do so. If it's just more of the same: dissing on everyone who posts things that go against your pro-housing pro-realtor, pro-status-quo agenda, then kindly stfu.

9   Bigsby   @   2012 Oct 20, 3:18am  

Quigley says

Bigsby you are such a troll.

This site is for people who are trying to figure out the housing market and make wise financial decisions. Not for people who just come and make snarky comments without any possible redeeming value. If you have any actual information or any reasonable speculation even to share, then please do so. If it's just more of the same: dissing on everyone who posts things that go against your pro-housing pro-realtor, pro-status-quo agenda, then kindly stfu.

How is it trolling to ask for a link to an outlandish claim? It's not speculation or made up information I'm interested in, it's facts. I'm not pro-housing or pro-realtor or whatever next you want to claim. Show me where I've been actively promoting housing. I'll be waiting. That doesn't mean I can't see through War's complete and utter nonsense. It's obviously a good time to buy in some places and still expensive in others. And what the hell has all that got to do with an actual troll like War posting up a bullshit piece of information? And no, why the hell should I stfu?

10   Bigsby   @   2012 Oct 20, 3:56am  

War/Darrell/Realtors... you're a known and proven user of Hotspot Shield or variation thereof and a repeated deleter of your own posts.

11   RealEstateIsBetterThanStocks   @   2012 Oct 21, 3:08am  

there will be more foreclosures after the election when another recession hits.

12   lostand confused   @   2012 Oct 21, 5:04am  

ptiemann says

I read last week that in the SF Bay Area, there are still millions defaulting every month, should be a million of additional inventory per month. So by the end of 2013, we should have 50 million empty houses, it's better to rent another year, I predict massive craters in those forced REO sales. If you think buying is cheaper than renting today, you will be ecstatic to see prices slashed another 50% or more.. thanks to even lower rates, principal and interest on a 15 year amortizing loan will cost less than the property tax OR insurance. Read the interview that Warren B. gave last week, he spells it all out there!
Again, this prediction is not for Phoenix or Oklahoma, but the exuberantly overpriced San Francisco Bay Area. Rest assured, the patient renters will be rewarded, only 1 more year to wait! And what does a small rent increase matter when you can save so much more 12-14 months from now!

Aaah sarcasm!!

13   REpro   @   2012 Oct 21, 5:38am  

US population: 314,621,923
http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html

Household size: 2.6
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14942047/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/census-us-household-size-shrinking/

We need about 121M housing units

Population growth: 0.9% per year.
http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?v=24&c=us&l=en

To fill-up needs we need about 1M new housing units per year plus... some to been demolished.

14   pkennedy   @   2012 Oct 21, 5:51am  

@REpro

The number warren buffet uses for replacement homes is 600K. 1.6M homes needed per year total. 1M for new families/immigration, 600K for replacements.

15   Raw   @   2012 Oct 21, 5:55am  

REpro says

To fill-up needs we need about 1M new housing units per year plus... some to been demolished.

1 million+ just to keep up with population increase.
Another 1.5 million or so to replace old homes.
Add to that homes that get destroyed in fires etc, and places like Detroit that simply get abandoned - you will have close to 3 million new housing units that need to be built.
In the last 5 years the number of new homes built has been pathetic. No wonder building stocks are going through the roof.

16   Raw   @   2012 Oct 21, 5:58am  

War says

Why are any houses needed when there are 20-30 MILLION excess empty housing units in the US?

Those mutual funds that have been buying up building stocks think otherwise. They should know better.

17   REpro   @   2012 Oct 21, 6:01am  

pkennedy says

The number warren buffet uses for replacement homes is 600K. 1.6M homes needed per year total. 1M for new families/immigration, 600K for replacements.

Assuming we have ONLY 16M+ units in excess inventory, developers should close doors and stop building for 10 straight years. Obviously it won’t happen, so expect more Detroit-like places in the future.

18   Eman   @   2012 Oct 21, 8:59am  

pkennedy says

@REpro

The number warren buffet uses for replacement homes is 600K. 1.6M homes needed per year total. 1M for new families/immigration, 600K for replacements.

IIRC, it's about 1.2M new single family homes and 400 new units of apartment are required annually to keep up with the population growth & replacements.

Comments 1 - 18 of 32       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste