Moral men and women will deny women equal rights.
invite response
2012 Nov 13, 12:30am 4,827 views 16 comments
Comments 1 - 16 of 16 Search these comments
Tenpoundbass
2012 Nov 13, 12:53am
What are equal rights really?
Are you saying there's a woman in this country that doesn't have equal rights? Is it not MY right to value people according to their skill set, or is it the Liberals right to Value everyone the same?
Because to tell you the truth, I could go for some of that Brain Surgeon's money. The 'burbs are starting to get a little stale.
And FTR, I'll take a female brain surgeons salary any day. Shoot I ain't proud.
Tenpoundbass
2012 Nov 13, 12:54am
In America NOT having equal rights, is just another way of saying.
"I'm to lazy to apply myself. "
turtledove
2012 Nov 13, 2:37am
If all men are good for is their brute strength then aren't they potentially made obsolete by weapons?
Greatest I am
2012 Nov 13, 4:22am
What are equal rights really?
Are you saying there's a woman in this country that doesn't have equal rights? Is it not MY right to value people according to their skill set, or is it the Liberals right to Value everyone the same?
Because to tell you the truth, I could go for some of that Brain Surgeon's money. The 'burbs are starting to get a little stale.
And FTR, I'll take a female brain surgeons salary any day. Shoot I ain't proud.
So if the ship is sinking, you will take the time to survey for skill sets and earning potentials and give some seats to men while women and children stay to drown.
Ok.
Do not call yourself a moral man. It would be a lie.
Regards
DL
Greatest I am
2012 Nov 13, 4:24am
If all men are good for is their brute strength then aren't they potentially made obsolete by weapons?
I think they would be yes. Like bringing a knife to a gun fight.
I take it you agree with the O P?
Regards
DL
Tenpoundbass
2012 Nov 13, 5:37am
So if the ship is sinking, you will take the time to survey for skill sets and earning potentials and give some seats to men while women and children stay to drown.
Oh Really where's this sinking ship with Women and Children being tossed aside. You folks invent problems much?
But to answer your question, I'd reckon I'd probably be a hell of lot more beneficial to the situation, than your self. See I'm an reactionary problem solver, type person, where as you're whachu call a common good ole fashioned Shit stirrer. Creating problems where none exist. See I doubt you'd recognize a problem if it bit you in the ass.
turtledove
2012 Nov 13, 6:53am
I take it you agree with the O P?
Regards
DL
I'm typing fast, cuz school's almost out and I have to get the kids....
No. I think it's absurd to categorize men as "this" and women as "that." Equal rights to me means that I have the freedom to choose my role in life. Assuming I commit to the same level as all other counterparts and am of a similar level of education and experience... then I should receive similar benefits.
I happen to be a stay at home mom. I'm lucky that my family is in a position to make that possible. I don't see taking care of the kids and the house as some kind of Tarzan and Jane scenario. I see it as a privilege that I can run my daughter all over CA for her dance competitions... and my son to his traveling baseball games. And I couldn't do that if my husband weren't making that possible.
HOWEVER, should things ever change, I would have to adjust my role.... I worked until I had children when I was 32. I have two master's degrees and served in upper management jobs at two different large companies. Changing roles would have its pains, but I assure you... I would find my way just fine, despite the fact that I'm a delicate little gal in need of male protection ;).
PolishKnight
2012 Nov 13, 10:40am
The "women as incubators of life" theory of female supremacy is hilarious. Consider welfare/single motherhood neighborhoods. Are they the ideal of human achievement? How many here live in one? And with 7 billion people on the planet, do we really need to be encouraging women to squeeze out starving children while downplaying men's ability to earn money and support families?
Yeah, this all works great as long as the Fed can print up cash for this kind of "equality" and "change and hope" paradise. Until it doesn't work anymore. Then it's back to nature.
Greatest I am
2012 Nov 13, 11:26pm
turtledove
This is not about you and I.
I guess that you have no problem then with that Italian captain who is in court as we speak for abandoning his ship while others were still on board.
Regards
DL
Greatest I am
2012 Nov 13, 11:30pm
The "women as incubators of life" theory of female supremacy is hilarious. Consider welfare/single motherhood neighborhoods. Are they the ideal of human achievement? How many here live in one? And with 7 billion people on the planet, do we really need to be encouraging women to squeeze out starving children while downplaying men's ability to earn money and support families?
Yeah, this all works great as long as the Fed can print up cash for this kind of "equality" and "change and hope" paradise. Until it doesn't work anymore. Then it's back to nature.
Perhaps if there were not so many deadbeat dads then the state would not have to print more cash.
Women are the backbone of family and that is a part of why they should be put above men.
Regards
DL
lostand confused
2012 Nov 14, 12:01am
Women are the backbone of family and that is a part of why they should be put above men.
From equal rights to above men-there you go-the modern feminist.
So are you still claiming to be a man or are you a woman now?
Tenpoundbass
2012 Nov 14, 1:01am
I guess that you have no problem then with that Italian captain who is in court as we speak for abandoning his ship while others were still on board.
Women and Children first, though I would give you a courtesy "Alleyoop" over the rails.
So are you still claiming to be a man or are you a woman now?
He's neither, he's a chirping pathetic little tit mouse. With nothing real to offer.
Greatest I am
2012 Nov 14, 1:22am
Women are the backbone of family and that is a part of why they should be put above men.
From equal rights to above men-there you go-the modern feminist.
So are you still claiming to be a man or are you a woman now?
If you read the O P then you might have noted that I gave women the highest position in it.
Regards
DL
Greatest I am
2012 Nov 14, 1:24am
I guess that you have no problem then with that Italian captain who is in court as we speak for abandoning his ship while others were still on board.
Women and Children first, though I would give you a courtesy "Alleyoop" over the rails.
So are you still claiming to be a man or are you a woman now?
He's neither, he's a chirping pathetic little tit mouse. With nothing real to offer.
Equality out the window.
Good for you.
Regards
DL
Tenpoundbass
2012 Nov 14, 1:52am
Equality out the window.
I have no idea what in the hell you're going on about.
But if you're implying we're unequal, even if you're saying I get the shitty end of the stick. I'll take it!
Robber Baron Elite Scum
2012 Nov 14, 2:15am
Rockefeller's funded feminism and women's liberation in order to tax half the population that wasn't taxable because they weren't working.
And also to actually divide the family by having both parents working. The kids will look at the state as the parents. The kids go to school at an earlier age so they can indoctrinate them earlier.
Single mothers are the worst parents and female leaders are the worst.
A women never invented any thing. Not the light bulb. Electricity, airplanes, cars, appliances, computers, Internet, cell phones, radio, speakers, TV or built roads.
Women are inferior. It is a fact proven by the sheer amount of achievement from men & the epic laughable fail of females.
Women are actually the disposable gender. They serve no purpose except as reproduction machines.
Men serve a purpose to experience, achieve, teach, lead & make life beautiful for themselves along with others.
Men actually can only raise kids into mature adults. Women can't. The simply serve no purpose in a kids life after puberty.
Women serve no such purpose except as slaves of man.
Single mothers turn sons into criminals & daughters into lesbian/bi-sexual feminist whores.
Most criminals come from single mothers and broken homes. That is a fact proven by credible statistics. Not all criminals but a very large majority... Too much to ignore as just a coincidence but as a actual correlation.
Women are already having more rights than men & men are actually being abused along with exploited by today's society.
Eventually the pussy bubble will collapse and shit will hit the fan on these worthless whores into cannibal anarchy. Men will get together in tribes to start mass murdering and eating women alive.
Once women start being mass murdered and eaten alive that's when they will do what nature intended them to do. Which is to bend over.
Moral men and women will deny women equal rights.
Seeking and demanding sanctity is one of the main five best rules of morality. Those rules shown below closely resemble most religious rules. For humankind to give an idea sanctity they must give sacrifice to it. The sacrifice that we must all do is deny women equality and give men a lower position in rulership. Men must bend the knee to women and elevate them to our ultimate sovereign. Those women and men who do not demand this are not in the best moral state of mind and should try to move to it.
We are all natural animals and follow the hierarchical rules of those species which have Alpha males. The main survival strategy of such a species is that the Alpha males will fight to the death to insure that the Beta females live.
Females, as the incubators of life and the most important within that species, must have the highest protection to insure that they will survive to continue the life of that species. Men, being the most physically powerful and having a more natural tendency to rule, must take a leadership role to insure this continuity. The Alpha of any species fights to insure that the Beta always has the highest position. The Kings and all other men IOW, must rule as the power behind the throne but the Queen is the one who must always sit on that throne and rule over the King.
The research done by Mr. Haigt shows that the right wings of religions and politics show more concern with tribalism than do the left wings. It appears then that if we are to move to the most advantageous moral position then it is to the right wings to promote it. As an esoteric ecumenist and Gnostic Christian, I am the left of center and not in the best camp to sell the view that women should rule even as I recognize that they should. The right has been given a wakeup call thanks to president Obama being re-elected. FMPOV then, the right needs a new platform if they are to survive, as they should to balance the political spectrum.
Generally speaking only; women are the weaker of the sexes and are better places to know what the requirements of survival are and should thus rule. Women should then demand the full protection and sacrifice of the Alphas males as that is the natural order of hierarchical species and must be to insure survival. This sacrifice gives sanctity to our species and insures it’s longevity. The religious and political right seem better suited to lead towards this end.
In my opinion, men and women who do not agree with this premise are not taking the best moral position for families or for society at large. This issue is more in the hands of men than women and in that sense men would be more immoral than women if they do not deny women equality and place women above themselves.
Should the religious and political right take up this best moral position and demand that equality be denied to all women and demand that they be given their rightful and natural position above men?
Please see the research and logic behind this premise.
http://blog.ted.com/2008/09/17/the_real_differ/
http://www.youtube.com/embed/jHc-yMcfAY4
Regards
DL
#politics