« First « Previous Comments 421 - 460 of 460 Search these comments
A practical woman (there are a few of us around) would prefer you spend less on the ring & wedding - and more on something important like the future.
A nice honeymoon trip is cool too, but not opulent.
I prefer if the woman spends her money on our future! An old vintage Saab convertible would be cool and not too opulent ;)
that takes care of #1.
what about #2??
Plenty enough #2 (and #3) for us.
Thanks for asking!
I'm very happy to be tying the knot but this process is ridiculous.
We had a cheapskate wedding, bbq beforehand in place of formal rehearsal dinner. Titanium rings and few thousand for a location and catering, done. The night before, she and bridesmaids were obsessing over flower arrangements. The day of she was annoyed with the caterer. This was in 2005. I said "that shit doesn't matter".
I asked her yesterday what she remembers from the wedding. The people and socializing and dancing are what sticks. What she ate or what the flowers looked like? Not important.
We are both STEM people though, a group that is more about substance and less about appearance and keeping up with the Joneses.
We are both STEM people though, a group that is more about substance and less about appearance and keeping up with the Joneses.
The expensive ring and the opulent wedding and honeymoon are the modern-day replacement of the dowry, and I don't see why women don't see them as symbols of their objectification and purchase. Perhaps the wedding and ring are the culmination of the vaunted female "mate selection process" represented in by a commercial edification. One would think the underlying love and commitment would be the important thing.
All girls want fancy fairy tale weddings, that's how they are genetically programmed.
I tell my daughter to just elope, and i'll give her $100,000 for a down payment on a house.
I stand corrected! I want diamonds! The chocolate ones that they're pushing on tv, and there was a blue one and and yellow one and.... Fuck it - everyone pitch in & buy me a diamond!!! please!
Don't you have to marry all of us first?
A practical woman (there are a few of us around) would prefer you spend less on the ring & wedding - and more on something important like the future.
A nice honeymoon trip is cool too, but not opulent.
A nice practical woman? What is that?
I tell my daughter to just elope, and i'll give her $100,000 for a down payment on a house.
If she takes the 100k you know you've done your job well.
She is still young, but so far has refused.
What is a reasonable amount of money to spend on a ring/wedding?
We got married at the JP. Big wedding are the biggest waste of money in our Society. Save that money and so something useful with it.
I've known newly weds that just had a $30,000 wedding, then less than three months later they are struggling to pay rent and their other bills.
Those kids would have been better off with 30K in seed money.
Everyone is agreeing on a topic here. What's wrong with everyone?
All girls want fancy fairy tale weddings, that's how they are genetically programmed.
I think it triggers an endorphin release that is irresistible to females, kind of like the mate selection feedback on steroids. The anticipation makes them quite literally insane. Imagine what set of psychic responses an eighteen year old guy would have in response to the notion of having his one and only sexual encounter. It would be hard to get him to trade that for 100k.
I almost came at just the thought of it. And when the time came, it was over in a second.
What is a reasonable amount of money to spend on a ring/wedding?
Research DeBeers and the absolutely ludicrous cost of diamonds, then research conflict diamonds--If you have a soul and a brain, you will not buy a diamond ever again. 12 years ago, my husband and I got silver bands off the internet, then got them engraved--total was around $100.
$Got a designer dress from the manufacturer for $100, had my mom augment it (sold it after the wedding for $80). I paid for dresses for my bridesmaids and flower girls. My Afghan friends brought amazing spread; others brought food too. My husband and I and friends were the band. The DJ was the videographer and a groomsman. Hall rental was super cheap ($120) because it was in the tiny town of Clyde. Everyone pitched in with flower decoration, etc. It's super great to have friends who are artists and entertainers--they are used to putting together great parties on the cheap.
Oh and my dad was the officiant ($0).
I got away with a wedding for under 2K.
We could have blown a bunch of our and our parents' money, but for what? My in-laws spent $15K on my SIL's wedding, which was two days before ours. Her marriage lasted less than 3 months.
All girls want fancy fairy tale weddings, that's how they are genetically programmed.
"ALL" really? Weird, but I used to play "divorced mom who lives in an apartment" when I was a kid. I have no idea where I got the idea. But, it was so far removed from my conservative upbringing. In any case, my little girl friends and I never talked about fairy tale weddings. We were too busy playing football, baseball, kick the can, and army with all the neighborhood boys.
And by the time a girl becomes a woman, she should have given up her childhood fantasies.
any piece of advise or wisdom, what would it be?
I like this one: "Expect 40%, give 60%" - if both in the relationship are living by that mantra, it's a good start.
Pay attention to how similar your views are on:
Intention to have children
Financial matters
Religion
take the boys to dance class
Did your boys have any trouble in school for taking dance or did you enroll them concurrently into some lethal form of martial arts?
My boys don't have any trouble, since we have strong masculine role models at our dance school. Our boys are also taught in our house to ignore ridiculous gender stereotypes, especially ones that only really apply mainly in the the States alone. Also, my older son is part of the Ukrainian dance, which is rooted in military training; so anything but feminine for the boys. We have more boys than girls in that. The teen girls do show up though...they like that class because the teacher from the Ukraine is pretty handsome, but also engaged to the gorgeous ballet instructor at our school, so they can dream on.
My boys are pretty confident too. A sixth grader at our school who loved ballet, and was gifted at it, got teased by another boy about it. The other boy took his lunch, and things like that, threatening to tell the other kids if he told about the bullying. It was horrible, the kid quit a week before playing the soldier captain in the Nutcracker. He only recently told anyone why he quit. The bully was suspended, and the ballet boy found the other kids thought ballet was not just okay, but cool. The girl he liked in his class REALLY thought it was cool, and they are "going around" as they say now.
Football players do it, baseball players do it, I even danced with a professional baseball player who trained in ballet at the same facility as the ballet company I danced in, he plays for the Giants now.
Why wouldn't a boy want to train in a room full of girls in leotards? Rather be smacking other men's butts in tights on the football field? Hmmmm?
It's sad, dance should be for everyone: young, old, girls and boys. Why are so many good things only for girls? I think there is a war on men, not women.
Well, the reason I ask is because I recently decided to buy the cow as they say and purchase an expensive ring knowing it was money that could be better used. The good news is that the wedding will be about 3.5k total which is pretty frugal considering all of the over priced options the bay area has to offer. The ring was 5k which naturally I thought was too fucking much, but considering her sister got a 2+ karat diamond she probably thought she was taking a pretty big discount. And the one thing I've learned through this whole wedding process is that there are crooks at every corner ready to offer some stupid overpriced service that you don't need but hey EVERYONE DOES IT SO YOU SHOULD TOO. That capitalized part petty much sums up what I think about weddings in the western world. I'm very happy to be tying the knot but this process is ridiculous.
The average engagement ring costs 5.2k.
Average wedding is America 25.2k.
Our ENTIRE wedding, including our clothes, invitations etc. cost about 1,500. My ring cost 200, but that's not fair since I technically wear a child's size (4 and under) and that made it cheaper. It's also just a band with engraving on the inside, but I love it. It matches my husband's for one thing, and I didn't have to take it off to partner in ballet. You usually can't wear a ring when partnering because you could scratch someone, but mine was just a band, so it was safe.
It was a gorgeous wedding and a magical day. It doesn't need to cost a fortune.
All girls want fancy fairy tale weddings, that's how they are genetically programmed.
I tell my daughter to just elope, and i'll give her $100,000 for a down payment on a house.
I didn't want a fairytale wedding, I just wanted to honor tradition; we have so few rites of passage anymore. We also wanted to have a big enough excuse to get everyone together we loved, which was the main motivation. It worked. Family from France and the Ukraine came, and all my teachers and friends from England, not to mention here in the States we had Washington, Oregon, Maine, New York and Utah represented. That's why our honeymoon was sticking around for weeks doing things in the Bay Area with all our guests who came from so far.
Make it a wonderful memory.
Our ENTIRE wedding, including our clothes, invitations etc. cost about 1,500. My ring cost 200, but that's not fair since I technically wear a child's size (4 and under) and that made it cheaper. It's also just a band with engraving on the inside, but I love it. It matches my husband's for one thing, and I didn't have to take it off to partner in ballet. You usually can't wear a ring when partnering because you could scratch someone, but mine was just a band, so it was safe.
It was a gorgeous wedding and a magical day. It doesn't need to cost a fortune.
Can you have a word with my daughter? Normally she is very very frugal, but I can't understand why she wants a big wedding when the time comes.
I played football and basketball in HS and joined a fraternity in college and played all the intermural sports for the house.
Looking back, I do wish I had more balls to have done dance.
A sixth grader at our school who loved ballet, and was gifted at it, got teased by another boy about it. The other boy took his lunch, and things like that, threatening to tell the other kids if he told about the bullying. It was horrible, the kid quit a week before playing the soldier captain in the Nutcracker. He only recently told anyone why he quit.
That's pretty much what I'd expect.
hrhjuliet says
The bully was suspended
In my day the school administration turned a blind eye to such bullying by rationalizing kids need to work that out for themselves. That's giving them the benefit of doubt. It was my distinct impression administrators just didn't give a crap or maybe felt the little fa&&@!" needed a good asskicking to "beat the queer out of him." Punishment would only come into play if the bullied kid's parents got a lawyer. Such was the time before Columbine and Mathew Sheppard.
and the ballet boy found the other kids thought ballet was not just okay, but cool. The girl he liked in his class REALLY thought it was cool, and they are "going around" as they say now.
Glad to hear it worked out for him.
Why wouldn't a boy want to train in a room full of girls in leotards? Rather be smacking other men's butts in tights on the football field? Hmmmm?
Or sweatily wrestling around on the floor, desperately grasping at other trying to have their way with them.
Oh yes, methinks the jock doth protest too much.
OTOH being in a room full of girls in leotards sounds like a recipe for a sexual harassment suit.
It's sad, dance should be for everyone: young, old, girls and boys. Why are so many good things only for girls?
Because a tomboy is far, far more acceptable to American society than being a "sissy".
The most important question IMO: How do they handle stress?
Ah an excellent point I forgot!
Early in my dating of Mrs. Vicente, we took a 2-week hostel-hopping trip around the Yucatan. A trip in another country with a few adversities will really show you whether you can stand to share a bathroom with this person long-term.
It's sad, dance should be for everyone: young, old, girls and boys. Why are so many good things only for girls?
Because a tomboy is far, far more acceptable to American society than being a "sissy".
Exactly. This is one of the many reasons I would argue that there is a war on men, not women. We can be whatever we want to be, but you can't. We can have a career or be a stay-at-home mom, but stay-at-home dads are still frowned on. Take formal wear as an example: You men wear a uniform of the drabbest colors on the planet, or black, in the most boring cut that barely shows off the male body. While we wear bright colors and have a thousand ways to show off our individuality and our body. You have to hide your body and hide your individuality. Your hair should be short, ours can be short or long. You are the worker bee, even at our human celebrations, for isn't that what formal wear is for? Once at the celebration, don't sing, don't dance and don't show affection. Whatever you do, don't engage in anything that makes life worth living, and if you do, don't do it public....but we can.
See my point? Who is really being oppressed?
: You men wear a uniform of the drabbest colors on the planet, or black, in the most boring cut that barely shows off the male body. While we wear bright colors and have a thousand ways to show off our individuality and our body. You have to hide your body and hide your individuality. Your hair should be short, ours can be short or long. You are the worker bee, even at our human celebrations, for isn't that what formal wear is for? Once at the celebration, don't sing, don't dance and don't show affection. Whatever you do, don't engage in anything that makes life worth living, and if you do, don't do it public....but we can.
See my point? Who is really being oppressed?
Right! Which is why gay men are so..."gay" ;)
: You men wear a uniform of the drabbest colors on the planet, or black, in the most boring cut that barely shows off the male body. While we wear bright colors and have a thousand ways to show off our individuality and our body. You have to hide your body and hide your individuality. Your hair should be short, ours can be short or long. You are the worker bee, even at our human celebrations, for isn't that what formal wear is for? Once at the celebration, don't sing, don't dance and don't show affection. Whatever you do, don't engage in anything that makes life worth living, and if you do, don't do it public....but we can.
See my point? Who is really being oppressed?
Right! Which is why gay men are so..."gay" ;)
Right? ;-)
But remember, peacocks are not female. Men are gorgeous and should be shown off too. I wish men had more room to be themselves and express it.
I spent my whole life in the dance world and only one guy was gay, and my dad worked at IBM for over thirty years and he knew at least four, and who knows how many others feel they need to hide who they are so we never knew about them. The ballet world has just about as many straight guys as any field, despite what Americans think. They just happen to be straight guys with a lot of confidence, and maybe that's half the problem, maybe most men are secretly suffering from a lack of real inner self worth?
I feel men are pushed around. Why should the man have to buy an expensive ring and not the lady? Why should men stand up there at the wedding like a prop or accessory to the all important bride? I thought it was a marriage between two people not a pageant for the bride? Why should men carry the heavy financial load? Women work now, so why the old fashion nonsense? If we women are going to be equal than we need to start treating men like equals. I'm tired of seeing men oppresse their individuality, dreams, and needs. It seems the only acceptable need for men is war, sports and sex, which is great, but men have other needs, other dreams and some really don't care for war or sports, and for heaven's sake that's great too.
Guys shouldn't have to be drunk to get away with showing affection, dancing, singing or basically displaying joy, or participating in a joyful activity. Is the only acceptable form of joy screaming over a football game? What if like my husband, who loves to play sports, finds watching sports boring as hell? Where is his social outlet?
My problem is my husband is my best friend, I was really good friends with my dance partner, I have lots of guy friends, my dad and I talk like friends, and I have two boys. Because of all of that, I am not under the delusion men are alike, or that they all enjoy being straggled by such rigid ideals. Men have one life to live too, it would be nice if we women wouldn't expect men to live it on a gray treadmill supporting our vibrant, cheerful and decadent lifestyle until they retire.
My problem is my husband is my best friend, I was really good friends with my dance partner, I have lots of guy friends, my dad and I talk like friends, and I have two boys. Because of all of that, I am not under the delusion men are alike, or that they all enjoy being straggled by such rigid ideals. Men have one life to live too, it would be nice if we women wouldn't expect men to live it on a gray treadmill supporting our vibrant, cheerful and decadent lifestyle until they retire.
I'm beginning to like this girl even more.
Can you do mankind a favor and make a documentary?
My wife has my great grandmothers ring. Even though it's not big and flashy, she loves it because its a family heirloom and makes her feel special.
We got married in Hawaii and our budget was 10K. We made it, but obviously when you do destination you are putting a burden on your guests. The upside is that you have a smaller group. We would not have been able to have something as nice locally with a larger guest list that would be expected.
Why does she need insurance if she is getting a settlement of half the marital assets and also alimony if she is making a lower income?
The ring is simply insurance for the woman if the marriage doesn't work out. If she wants a bigger ring: she anticipates things not working out.
Why does she need insurance if she is getting a settlement of half the marital assets and also alimony if she is making a lower income?
The ring is simply insurance for the woman if the marriage doesn't work out. If she wants a bigger ring: she anticipates things not working out.
I think the engagement ring is to claim exclusivity of the woman's charms BEFORE marriage.
Perhaps it was a bribe against the women from getting herself knocked up by her secret "bad boy" boyfriend or "Mr Right now" before the wedding and cuckolding the hapless husband into raising someone else's kids.
Someone posted this "Best of" Craigslist ad a while ago here on Patnet and its worth revisiting. It highlights nicely what I am talking about:
http://www.craigslist.org/about/best/sea/274495936.html
After all until the paperwork is signed she (now neither person) has no claim to any of the others assets.
Take formal wear as an example: You men wear a uniform of the drabbest colors on the planet, or black, in the most boring cut that barely shows off the male body.
I married a musician, so that's never an issue. If you see a guy with a magnificent beard walking around downtown Walnut Creek in bright green, blue, red, or orange pants, tell him we need some whole milk from Whole Foods (the kind in the glass bottle). Thanks.
It was a gorgeous wedding and a magical day. It doesn't need to cost a fortune.
Can you have a word with my daughter? Normally she is very very frugal, but I can't understand why she wants a big wedding when the time comes.
Ha Ha... Daughters....oh boy....
You know, you can always just get a ladder at Home Depot and prop it up at her window... hint... hint...
And maybe even an envelope with $5,0000 on the bottom rung.
Knowing her, she would climb down, take the envelope, and climb right back up again.
But remember, peacocks are not female. Men are gorgeous and should be shown off too.
In biology, male animals have to be either useful or pretty. They do not have to be both.
In biology, male animals have to be either useful or pretty. They do not have to be both.
And/or be tasty:
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/episodes/what-males-will-do/meet-the-mate-munchers/953/
Womens main asset, look fades a lot after 28 and at the same time mens testosterone so little need to approach a women.
India 1% n Chile 13% divorce rate most western countries 50%.
I never got people that waited until after 30 to get married.
"Can't live with them, can't live without them"
India 1% n Chile 13% divorce rate most western countries 50%. Though still curious on why women gave dowry when they get married in some areas of india but in western culture u pay all for women .
« First « Previous Comments 421 - 460 of 460 Search these comments
Hi guys,
As the old adage states, "Can't live with them, can't live without them."
For the guys that are married now or have been married, I'm wondering what your experience has been and if you could give a newly engaged man (hypothetical to me since I am not engaged) any piece of advise or wisdom, what would it be?
I love my GF, but for a few minutes I'm going to zoom out and look at things from a more technical, statistical, and less emotional point of view.
To be honest, I am a bit discouraged at just how many people I know who don't seem to be too happy in their marriages. It always seems to be the same story. Things started off great. There was excitement, adventure, strong physical and emotional chemistry. Then 2-3yrs into it, those feels started to fade. Some couples moved on to the next phase of their lives and had some glue, er I mean kids which kept things fresh and exciting.
I saw a plot in the newspaper several years back that showed divorce statistics as a function of time. There is a spike early on in the marriage (first couple of years), then one at 7 years (7-year itch), and one at about year 18-20 (when the glue is all grown up). If you make it past that, you are fairly safe (not necessarily happy, but likelihood of divorce is low). Some of that is influenced by the fact that you don't have the same options at 45 or 50 as you do at 25 or 30. Sucks, but that's the truth.
I recall reading a book by psycologist Scott Peck that studied the term "Love." He argues that 100% of relationships fall out of love, usually pretty early on in the first few years. The feeling of love is not true love then. The conscious decision to love someone once you lose the "in love" feeling is what real love is all about.
Regarding statistics, 50% of couples who get married in this country wind up in divorce (To be fair, some of those aren't 1st marriages so that 50% number isn't quite as bad as it seems - The reason is that 2nd marriages have a higher divorce rate than 1st marriages and 3rd marriages have a higher divorce rate than 2nd marriages). Moving on, if 50% of couples get divorced, then 50% of couples don't get divorced. Surely those 50% that remain together aren't all happy marriages? So then let's say that half of the marriages that stay together are happy. That means that 25% of couples getting married in the first place remain happy, lol. I really don't like the odds here!
But anytime you get into this debate, you have to get into the alternative, being alone into older age. As much as I see my folks fight and bicker, I tend to think it's better than the alternative (at least for the level they fight and bicker).
A while back Patrick argued that the average person remains in their purchased home for no more than 6-7 years. He said, you might think you are different, but statistically you are not. Same thing goes for divorce. Nobody goes into marriage thinking they will get a divorce. But statistically, 1 in 2 people do in the USA.
What do you guys think?
As a side note, I am really curious about the following. What is the divorce rate assuming the following:
Both Members are devout Catholic ?
Both Members are devout Christian ?
Both Members are devout Muslim ?
Both Members are Atheist ?
Members don't share religious beliefs ?