« First « Previous Comments 30 - 41 of 41 Search these comments
We will never get more than 18-20% of GDP in taxes
dogmatic belief not fact in evidence. Other countries -- countries with AAA credit ratings still -- get double that.
Everything I've seen puts the deficit at nearly twice the defense budget
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/FDEFX
that would be $1.6T
your data is bad
SS costs need to be reigned
SS has very little cost to rein in.
Now, if you want to cut SS benefits, screw you, LOL
The trend is in the opposite direction though. Obamacare increases federal medical spending, in addition to increasing total national medical spending.
this is very true. PPACA is very troublesome from a budget standpoint. Many families are going to get $10,000/yr insurance subsidies. I don't think this is going to be paid for by the law's tax rises, either, though they will bring in a bit more money from the 1% now.
$50B a year in revenue:
http://www.heritage.org/~/media/Images/Reports/2011/01/wm3100_table1_750px.ashx
your data is bad
Even your link showed a deficit of $1.1T, which is around 70% of $1.6T. I said "nearly," which might be somewhat more than your link (which is based on White House data) but is consistent with other estimates.
SS has very little cost to rein in.
True, Social Security operates quite efficiently. If we have a choice between subsidizing Social Security vs subsidizing Medicare, I'd rather subsidize Social Security and let the recipients decide for themselves how to spend the money. FDR said Social Security should protect people from having to worry about going hungry in their old age, an affordable goal that I support; Medicare is a totally different story.
I agree about Medicare.
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/W824RC1
As long as the SSTF has money in it SS doesn't need any subsidization, FICA payers just need their damn bonds they were made to collectively buy 1989-2009 paid on.
When the Republican Party starts another currency that is tax-free, the Democratic Party will self-destruct.
The Red State Socialism chart demonstrates how each State ranks at managing their Federal spending and showing a profit. Where is the glamour in being on the bottom of this chart?
We will never get more than 18-20% of GDP in taxes
dogmatic belief not fact in evidence. Other countries -- countries with AAA credit ratings still -- get double that.
Double that? Really? Which countries?
How much would taxes have to go up on EVERYONE in America to get where you think we need to go?
Double that? Really? Which countries?
Example, Sweden. Hardly a "commie gulag hellhole".
How far will they have to go DOWN before we achieve Perfect Freedom?
Afghanistan has very low tax vs GDP. Also Angola, Algeria, Congo, Iran.
This notion that endlessly cutting taxes will sooner or later lead to Utopia..... doing the same thing over and over and expecting better results next time is one definition of insanity.
« First « Previous Comments 30 - 41 of 41 Search these comments
The Republican Party did not lose last Tuesday's election. It was obliterated, crushed, slaughtered, massacred, squashed, annihilated — and, let’s hope, extinguished.
For the party of Lincoln, it’s been a week of sifting through the carnage: What went wrong? How could a party that just a decade ago controlled all of government have been so completely nullified that an incumbent Democrat who was quite possibly the worst president in a century handily defeated the Republican nominee?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/nov/11/curl-time-for-a-new-republican-party/
#politics