1
0

Cost of War to the United States


               
2013 Feb 17, 7:20am   5,107 views  33 comments

by Dan8267   follow (4)  

http://costofwar.com/

$1,424,501,975,790 approximate cost of wars at this instant
114,761,359 number households in the U.S.

$12,412 and rising, per household cost of war.

G.W. Bush gave each of us $300 back in tax breaks at the cost of over 12 grand in future taxes. How exactly was that a good deal?

#politics

« First        Comments 19 - 33 of 33        Search these comments

19   New Renter   @   2013 Feb 20, 3:22am  

Dan8267 says

New Renter says

My friend science has already provided temporary solutions for that problem long ago:

Someone already tried that and wrote about his experience in this classic Craigslist post.

True, sometimes scientific progress can be messy.

Perhaps if the poster had used a better quality razor or a chemical process (Nair) as well as silk boxers his ass would have been more comfortable.

Do women have comparable problems when getting a Brazilian? Maybe an ass waxing would have worked out better.

Don't worry Dan, your "friend" has lots of options.

20   MisdemeanorRebel   @   2013 Feb 20, 6:31am  

New Renter says

Lets apply STEM employees to figure out a way we can ALL live the French dream of working only 3 hrs a day yet still achieve a comfortable modern standard of living.

I think this one is more of a political problem than a technological one.

I think we also should do Mars, simply because we can. The idea that something awesome that is feasible but isn't getting done bothers me.

21   curious2   @   2013 Feb 20, 6:51am  

New Renter says

thunderlips11 says

A Race to Mars program would be a great way of enhancing US prestige, finding employment for our glut of STEM grads, and generating countless useful technologies.

I'd rather see those STEM grads working on eliminating all STDs and male pattern baldness.

We could have done both for less than the cost of the Iraq war. Please don't fall into the too common politicians' trap of pitting one field of useful research against another. The false choice between medical research and physics research is like the false choice between liberty and security. Either way, politicians are trying to get you to trade ashes for trees, hot air for a cool breeze, because what they're selling has a higher markup for their patronage network.

Just as the worst products are advertised on TV - because it's the only way to get you to buy them - so too the worst products have the biggest lobbying budgets, for the same reason.

As Peter P commented earlier, good companies make good products and sell them at a profit; great companies sell crap. How much have you paid for 'designer water' or a chemical-laden beverage with some coloring and addictive sweetener and CO2 bubbles to make you more flatulent? How much did people pay PhRMA for Vioxx ($2/pill plus the cost of strokes, for Hospital Association revenue) compared to equally effective analgesics that cost 10 cents or less? How much will you pay for Obamacare, while people in other countries live longer with less than half as much medical spending?

When you factor in the costs of diabetes etc, we could get to Mars and cure diseases for less than what we spend on junk food, let alone war.

22   nope   @   2013 Feb 20, 1:04pm  

Dan8267 says

Your missing the point. Again,

China has also leapfrogged the West in the last two years to emerge as the world’s largest manufacturer of solar panels. And the country is pushing equally hard to build nuclear reactors and the most efficient types of coal power plants.

These efforts to dominate renewable energy technologies raise the prospect that the West may someday trade its dependence on oil from the Mideast for a reliance on solar panels, wind turbines and other gear manufactured in China.

I'm not saying China is doing science for the sake of science. I'm saying China is taking the technological lead because economic power is the political and military power of the 21st century.

And I'm saying you're wrong because the us spends many multiples of China on r&d every year. We have the most Nobel prize winners, most frequently cited research papers, 30 of the top 50 STEM universities, and most innovative tech companies.

Meanwhile, China us full of degree mills that publish research that wouldn't be acceptable in us highschools, plagiarizes European research papers, and routinely steals IP for its domestic market because it can't develop its own.

China isn't anywhere close to "taking the lead". They've got at least a dozen countries to surpass before they can even think about it.

23   New Renter   @   2013 Feb 20, 2:45pm  

WTF is so awesome about sending a human to Mars? What is it that a human can do over there that a decent robot can't do except die a horrible death?

Remember the Mars Climate Orbiter?

What exactly have we gotten out of the ISS aside from 24/7 stock footage for the most boring channel on earth? The shuttle?

I'm not against space exploration, I just want to see it done right.

24   Bellingham Bill   @   2013 Feb 20, 3:13pm  

New Renter says

What is it that a human can do over there that a decent robot can't do except die a horrible death?

+1

There's nothing for us on Mars other than rocks. We've got plenty of rocks here.

25   curious2   @   2013 Feb 20, 3:23pm  

Bellingham Bill says

There's nothing for us on Mars other than rocks.

You're forgetting the sand. And the evidence of water! That's practically beachfront! Imagine, a whole planet of beachfront property! And none of it is signed up with a Realtor(tm) yet. The first Realtors(tm) to land there could get an exclusive listing for an entire planet of beachfront property! Every Realtor(tm) deserves this opportunity. Every Realtor should be sent to Mars as soon as technology allows.

New Renter says

What is it that a human can do over there that a decent robot can't do except die a horrible death?

Please see above...

26   New Renter   @   2013 Feb 20, 3:28pm  

curious2 says

You're forgetting the sand. And the evidence of water! That's practically beachfront! Imagine, a whole planet of beachfront property! And none of it is signed up with a Realtor(tm) yet. The first Realtors(tm) to land there could get an exclusive listing for an entire planet of beachfront property! Every Realtor(tm) deserves this opportunity. Every Realtor should be sent to Mars as soon as technology allows.

See this is what I'm talking about! The moon is closer, also has sand and evidence of water. It'd be cheaper to send the realtors there.

27   curious2   @   2013 Feb 20, 3:31pm  

New Renter says

The moon is closer....

that's the issue though - it's too close - you can see the earth from there, so they might find their way back.

New Renter says

What exactly have we gotten out of the ISS aside from 24/7 stock footage for the most boring channel on earth?

Just wait until Soylent Red (spoiler alert: "Soylent Red is Realtors(tm)") and the first season of Survivor: Realtors(tm) on Mars! It will be cross-branded with CSI: Mars and the hard-hitting Fox News Special Report, Mars: When Realtors(tm) Attack!

28   New Renter   @   2013 Feb 20, 4:15pm  

curious2 says

New Renter says

The moon is closer....

that's the issue though - it's too close - you can see the earth from there, so they might find their way back.

New Renter says

What exactly have we gotten out of the ISS aside from 24/7 stock footage for the most boring channel on earth?

Just wait until Soylent Red (spoiler alert: "Soylent Red is Realtors(tm)") and the first season of Survivor: Realtors(tm) on Mars! It will be cross-branded with CSI: Mars and the hard-hitting Fox News Special Report, Mars: When Realtors(tm) Attack!

So you shoot for the moon, miss and they end up on a one way trip into the sun. Still cheaper than Mars.

29   Dan8267   @   2013 Feb 21, 1:12am  

Bellingham Bill says

There's nothing for us on Mars other than rocks. We've got plenty of rocks here.

Until some county like China claims the planet for their own and starts a colony there. Then all of a sudden it will become a national security issue to grab up as much extra-terrestrial real estate as possible as quickly as possible.

30   coriacci1   @   2013 Feb 21, 1:31am  

"I ride my bike, I roller skate, don't drive no car
Don't go too fast, but I go pretty far
For somebody who don't drive
I been all around the world
Some people say, I done all right for a girl"

Melanie 1972

31   New Renter   @   2013 Feb 21, 3:25am  

Dan8267 says

Bellingham Bill says

There's nothing for us on Mars other than rocks. We've got plenty of rocks here.

Until some county like China claims the planet for their own and starts a colony there. Then all of a sudden it will become a national security issue to grab up as much extra-terrestrial real estate as possible as quickly as possible.

That's funny!

32   FortWayne   @   2013 Feb 21, 3:33am  

Dan8267 says

Bellingham Bill says

There's nothing for us on Mars other than rocks. We've got plenty of rocks here.

Until some county like China claims the planet for their own and starts a colony there. Then all of a sudden it will become a national security issue to grab up as much extra-terrestrial real estate as possible as quickly as possible.

They'll only do it if they find oil or gold on it.

33   Dan8267   @   2013 Feb 22, 6:45am  

The one thing countries love more than anything else and will fight over to claim is territory. Once the acquisition of extraterrestrial territory begins, all nations will want as much of it as they can get regardless of the local resources (which is likely to be considerable considering all this territory has never been mined).

« First        Comments 19 - 33 of 33        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste