patrick.net

of course prostitute slaves must be kept well groomed and well fed when they're in their prime years, when this period is over then support generally ends. Then this women goes through a stage of bewilderment- "I thought I was important?!", until she finally realizes that no one really cares about her situation. If she was so lucky to have reproduced with someone who has money, this is her ticket to support. If not, she must increasingly rely on the welfare system for her income, more than likely she has little real skills and a completely dim concept of what is happening in the world around her. She attempts to convert her childish interest in clothes, shoes, arts and crafts into some kind of profitable venture but quickly finds that those can't provide much either. She decides to hone her tactics a bit, gets more 'resourceful' and ruthless in her dealing with men. A few fall for it, but most men can smell her desperation and see her aging features a mile away. The chance of finding a man to respect her is minimal if not totally non-existent. She knows what she spent her youth doing, as do all her family, and most men can read between the lines.

entitled: Vexed In The City, a tale of middle aged feminine woe

MershedPerturders says

Obama is a tyrant in case you haven't noticed.

"A tyrant (Greek τύραννος, tyrannos), is a ruler of a cruel and oppressive character who is an absolute ruler unrestrained by law or constitution, and/or one who has usurped legitimate sovereignty."

Disagreeing with a leader's policies does not make him/her a "tyrant".

Can there please be a "Misogynist" category? Then the unhappy little boys that have some serious issues with their mama (and papa) will have their very own place to whine and complain about being victimized by women, and the rest of the adults can go on living their lives together on this planet and reading the forum in peace.

Indiana Jones says

Can there please be a "Misogynist" category?

Can there please be a wretched corrupted bitch category?

MershedPerturders says

Can there please be a wretched corrupted bitch category?

Thank you for the lovely example.

This is a ridiculous point to argue, but if you must... I will engage for a short time.

Honestly, how many women do you know who are abandoning their children (not counting abortion, of course) vs. the amount of men who have chosen to not be involved with their children (not supporting them or having much, if any contact)? In my personal experience, I have never met a woman who has left her child. I have met a number of men who do not know or barely know their children.

This is why we hear about single moms much more than about single dads.

This is why there are laws to make men at the least, financially responsible for their children.

I know you will probably call me names and rip this very reasonable response apart. Have fun with it!

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 24 million children in America -- one out of three -- live in biological father-absent homes.

Consequently, there is a "father factor" in nearly all of the social issues facing America today.

- See more at: http://www.fatherhood.org/media/consequences-of-father-absence-statistics#sthash.CnTy4B4X.dpuf

and

The Typical Single Parent is a Mother:

Approximately 84% of custodial parents are mothers, and
16% of custodial parents are fathers

http://singleparents.about.com/od/legalissues/p/portrait.htm

Contrary to what you see in the press (or Barbie), misogyny is not rampant in modern societies. There is no evil patriarchy oppressing women. Quite the reverse: Both men and women are guilty of misandry, a bias against men. My City Journal article reviews the overwhelming evidence (ignored or suppressed by misandrist journalists and scholars) of bias against men, from the ‘women are wonderful’ effect reported by psychologists to the discrimination against men in the legal system, government, schools, corporations, and academia.

This misandrist bias is probably innate, and it’s being exploited by a diversity industry that falsely blames sexism for any gender gap not favouring women. Yes, women are ‘underrepresented’ in some fields, especially at the top, but it’s not because of discrimination. It’s because of factors like the ‘gender productivity gap’ and the ‘competition gap’ (which explains why scientists in the 99th percentile of productivity are disproportionately male, and why 95 of the top 100 Scrabble players are men). The misogyny myth serves the interests of the diversity industry, but it’s enormously damaging to the rest of society — women as well as men — because it poisons relations between the sexes and undermines the system that has provided unprecedented opportunities and prosperity to everyone: meritocracy.