« First « Previous Comments 215 - 223 of 223 Search these comments
Fuck if I know...if your old man would only come home more than one night a week, maybe she'd lighten up...
sbh says
Why am I so quick to admit to my momma's a bitch?
I'm sorry, my bad. ....well....maybe not that sorry.
Up in Fredericksburg, while I was trying to get it up, I saw my toothless pappy being totally owned by a baglady. For a moment I thought I was in Abilene's shithole but then realized I missed and was actually peering into her grilled cheese sandwich. Must've been extra stress from when you left me twisting in the wind the past couple days.
The holy trinity of 1 percenters, low teeth to tattoo ratio white trash, and
neocon wanna be fascists aren't ever voting D. The union carders, ivory tower
elitists, and low income government dependants aren't ever voting R.
Correct. I would also add to this that a libertarian who hates "both sides" most likely believes that reps are not conservative enough but still considers them lesser of 2 evils (and hence will vote for a rep) while a progressive leftist believes that democrats are still "corporatists" but will vote for them anyway since they consider them to be lesser of 2 evils vs reps.
So how does that amount to unions buying votes?
by co opting them.
Who did public employees unions influence to change their vote?
Same thing
You aren't making any sense. The vast majority of people who would be bureacratice government drones would have voted D anyway. How the hell do you co opt anyone into doing something they would have done anyway.
Some do, I think the Koch brothers do.
Pray tell. I'd like to know how you come up with that opinion when so much of their policital funding activity is totally secret and unaccounted for. No one except the Koch brothers knows who they fund and why.
You aren't making any sense. The vast majority of people who would be bureacratice government drones would have voted D anyway. How the hell do you co opt anyone into doing something they would have done anyway.
It has to continue to be created or bought especially with people who are easily bought...
Pray tell. I'd like to know how you come up with that opinion when so much of their policital funding activity is totally secret and unaccounted for. No one except the Koch brothers knows who they fund and why.
I have heard they fund the Cato institute and others:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_activities_of_the_Koch_brothers#Educational_grants
At their level they all are quite philanthropic.
It has to continue to be created or bought especially with people who are easily bought..
You've been taking logic and grammar lessons from the captain I see.
I have heard they fund the Cato institute and others:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_activities_of_the_Koch_brothers#Educational_grants
At their level they all are quite philanthropic.
What does their public philanthropic donations have to do with their private and very secretive political donations? I don't have a problem with them funding their political agenda. It's certainly their right under the insane US election laws that allow pretty much unlimited spending.. I have a big problem with their being able to fund their agenda in secret. Soros funds a ton of money to the left. But it's all accounted for and in the public eye.
Poor white trash and rednecks have been voting republican for 50 years and they are still poor.
If the Koch Brothers were in Russia, they'd be called "Oligarchs".
You've been taking logic and grammar lessons from the captain I see.
How so?
Soros funds a ton of money to the left. But it's all accounted for and in the public eye.
Soros profits off of shorting currency at the expense of the US, Britain, and the Philippines to the tune of billions. But he is ok because it is transparent? If that is what he does in public what is he doing in secret, you don't think a guy like that is clean do you?
That link showed quite a bit, what is secret?
« First « Previous Comments 215 - 223 of 223 Search these comments
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/04/07/the-less-americans-know-about-ukraines-location-the-more-they-want-u-s-to-intervene/
I'm guessing that the further away their guesses were from Ukraine's actual location, the more likely they were to
- be religious
- oppose marriage equality
- reject evolution
- support voter ID laws designed to keep minorities from voting
- want to cut "entitlements" but not the military
Can we just admit that one third of Americans are just plain stupid and should not be allowed to vote or reproduce?
When you place the Ukraine inside the borders of the continental United States, you shouldn't have a voice when it comes to important decisions.