patrick.net

Also, neither of them is capable of being funny no matter how hard they try.

Case in point...

I've got to believe Dan and bob are the same person. Their comments come in pairs a few minutes apart way too frequently to be random.

Even their screen names are the same, 3 letters followed by 4 numbers.... What are the odds of that?

10

indigenous @ 2014 Jul 21, 2:27pm

That never stopped anyone from arguing with you.

My comments are not inane. I think I would be able to win a debate with Bill Maher quite easily as he is a comedian, not an economist.

11

Dan8267 @ 2014 Jul 21, 2:28pm

Dan8267 says

That never stopped anyone from arguing with you.

My comments are not inane. I think I would be able to win a debate with Bill Maher quite easily as he is a comedian, not an economist.

Ah, the foolishness of underestimating one's opponent...

12

indigenous @ 2014 Jul 21, 2:28pm

Even their screen names are the same, 3 letters followed by 4 numbers.... What are the odds of that?

Clearly a sign of a conspiracy, bgamall4 what say you?

13

indigenous @ 2014 Jul 21, 2:29pm

Ah, the foolishness of underestimating one's opponent...

I don't think so...

14

Dan8267 @ 2014 Jul 21, 2:33pm

Dan8267 says

Ah, the foolishness of underestimating one's opponent...

I don't think so...

You're welcome to prove it by refuting the statement's in the video in the original post. Talk is cheap.

15

Dan8267 @ 2014 Jul 21, 2:34pm

Did you see how wonky Dan's arm was in his avatar??

As wonky as conservative ideology?

16

indigenous @ 2014 Jul 21, 2:34pm

Also, neither of them is capable of being funny no matter how hard they try.

i don't think so, I would say CIC or errc have by far and away the best sense of humor. Literally LOL a distant 3rd would be AF.

Bill Maher is never LOL in all fairness Stewart and Colbert are funny, they are just economically illiterate and they play to the biggest audience.

17

Dan8267 @ 2014 Jul 21, 2:35pm

Dan8267 says

Also, neither of them is capable of being funny no matter how hard they try.

i don't think so, I would say CIC or errc have by far and away the best sense of humor. Literally LOL a distant 3rd would be AF.

This coming from someone who believes Sarah Palin is fit to be president. 'nuff said.

18

indigenous @ 2014 Jul 21, 2:36pm

You're welcome to prove it by refuting the statement's in the video in the original post.

I will look at it but I don't have a lot of extra time these days.

19

Dan8267 @ 2014 Jul 21, 2:39pm

Dan8267 says

You're welcome to prove it by refuting the statement's in the video in the original post.

I will look at it but I don't have a lot of extra time these days.

Says the guy who spends all day polluting Patrick.net with right-wing propaganda.

20

indigenous @ 2014 Jul 21, 2:40pm

This coming from someone who believes Sarah Palin is fit to be president. 'nuff said.

This from someone who thinks Warren would be a good one.

I don't recall saying Palin would be good for Prez she does't have the experience but certainly would do better than Obama or Warren. You see we do not need another pseudo intellectual. We just need someone who is honest.

21

Dan8267 @ 2014 Jul 21, 2:40pm

Dan8267 says

Call it Crazy says

Did you see how wonky Dan's arm was in his avatar??

As wonky as conservative ideology?

No, as wonky as your thought processes are.

Feel free to challenge any on my ideas in an open debate. Any time, any place.

22

indigenous @ 2014 Jul 21, 2:45pm

Funny you mention that, I'm STILL waiting for that list of accomplishments from Dan showing us why Warren is qualified to be president... It's been days and I still haven't seen a single accomplishment from him.

That is his debating style. They teach it over at Possum U or PU for short.

23

indigenous @ 2014 Jul 21, 2:52pm

Although, he would make a great wheel chock for my truck

See what I mean that is funny, I don't care who you are.

24 bob2356 @ 2014 Jul 21, 10:10pm

I think I would be able to win a debate with Bill Maher quite easily as he is a comedian, not an economist.

I'm sure you could "win" a debate with anyone. No one else on the planet defines winning as ignoring everything said and generally playing stupid, but for you it would be a win. .

25 anonymous 2014 Jul 21, 10:26pm

bob2356 says

indigenous says

I think I would be able to win a debate with Bill Maher quite easily as he is a comedian, not an economist.

I'm sure you could "win" a debate with anyone. No one else on the planet defines winning as ignoring everything said and generally playing stupid, but for you it would be a win. .

He wins by simply engaging his opponent. Its called trolling

26

Y @ 2014 Jul 21, 10:39pm

Opening sentence:

"Finally there's been an uproar over all the neocons who lied about the iraq war...."

So, which neocons 'lied' about the Iraq war, and what was the lie?

( don't go near WMD's, as that was universally accepted by everyone and the evidence was generated by multiple sources inside and outside the USA )

27

Y @ 2014 Jul 21, 10:43pm

this is damning evidence....

Even their screen names are the same, 3 letters followed by 4 numbers.... What are the odds of that?

28

Y @ 2014 Jul 21, 10:44pm

This is a statement of fact.
Why would you think it should be "funny" in the first place??

Dan8267 says

Also, neither of them is capable of being funny no matter how hard they try.

Case in point...

Call it Crazy says

I've got to believe Dan and bob are the same person. Their comments come in pairs a few minutes apart way too frequently to be random.

Even their screen names are the same, 3 letters followed by 4 numbers.... What are the odds of that?

29

Y @ 2014 Jul 21, 10:48pm

I disagree.
Maher is funny to watch, I tivo the show all episodes.
The funniest scenes occur when one of his conservative guests take him to town over one of his stoned dilated pupil moments...

Bill Maher is never LOL in all fairness Stewart and Colbert are funny, they are just economically illiterate and they play to the biggest audience.

30

Y @ 2014 Jul 21, 10:51pm

OTOH, what if Dan and CIC are the same person, setting each other up for the kill, depending on which Shirley Mason was typing?

31

Y @ 2014 Jul 21, 10:52pm

If Palin was president we'd be in the middle of WWIII....

I don't recall saying Palin would be good for Prez she does't have the experience but certainly would do better than Obama or Warren. You see we do not need another pseudo intellectual. We just need someone who is honest.

32

Y @ 2014 Jul 21, 10:54pm

This means nothing coming from a liberal, as Obama has set the standard for defining "open debates", something he promised but never came close to delivering on.

Feel free to challenge any on my ideas in an open debate.

33

Dan8267 @ 2014 Jul 22, 12:21pm

tautology

http://www.G2y8Sx4B2Sk

A tautology is a statement that's always true. Yes, that does describe my posts.

The opposite of a tautology is a contradiction, a statement that is always false. That perfectly describes your posts.

I can see why conservatives hate tautologies. The truth is their enemy.

34

Dan8267 @ 2014 Jul 22, 12:22pm

SoftShell says

This means nothing coming from a liberal, as Obama has

The fact that you consider Obama to be a liberal shows that you have your head up your ass.

35

indigenous @ 2014 Jul 22, 12:40pm

A tautology is a statement that's always true. Yes, that does describe my posts.

The opposite of a tautology is a contradiction, a statement that is always false. That perfectly describes your posts.

I can see why conservatives hate tautologies. The truth is their enemy.

No dumb ass, you have the wrong definition, the definition you are referring to is used in logic, something you are not in same zip code as...

The definition that I'm referring to is when the same idea is repeated with different words, so as to imply truth.

36

indigenous @ 2014 Jul 22, 12:42pm

Obama to be a liberal

You consider him to be a communist?

37

Dan8267 @ 2014 Jul 22, 12:45pm

Dan8267 says

Obama to be a liberal

You consider him to be a communist?

Only an idiot would think that one has to be either a liberal or a communist. That's taking stupidity to a whole new level.

38

Dan8267 @ 2014 Jul 22, 12:48pm

The definition that I'm referring to is when the same idea is repeated with different words, so as to imply truth.

One, you don't get to make up your own definitions.

Two, you're thinking of Fox News. I present evidence, which you then ignore. Fox News repeats lies even after they've been debunked. That was the whole point of this thread. It's what Bill Maher calls "zombie lies". The fact that you didn't make that connection just shows how divorced from reality you are.

39 bob2356 @ 2014 Jul 22, 2:20pm

The Professor says

I'm pretty sure Bob is a unique (possibly real) individual with some good and some sock puppet ideas. He keeps you wondering

Bob is very real, quite colorful, and definitely one of a kind, many people have told me so.

Remember in Patton when he screams at his staff let no man come back alive and his aid says sometimes they don't know if you are serious or not. Patton said "It's not important that they know, it's only important that I know".

I endeavor to continue to keep you guessing.

40

Dan8267 @ 2014 Jul 22, 2:31pm

The Professor says

Now Dan is an advanced form of AI programmed to spew Petabytes of data. He gives thorough insightful analysis with a liberal bent and the twisted logic of the programming team that created him.

Sounds like a complement to me.

41

indigenous @ 2014 Jul 22, 2:35pm

Only an idiot would think that one has to be either a liberal or a communist.

Then splain you self?

42

indigenous @ 2014 Jul 22, 2:36pm

bob2356 says

I endeavor to continue to keep you guessing.

You are certainly questionable...

43

indigenous @ 2014 Jul 22, 2:38pm

One, you don't get to make up your own definitions.

Only you would think I'm making this up.

It's what Bill Maher calls "zombie lies".

Yes an unimpeachable source of information, he is a mutt.

44

Dan8267 @ 2014 Jul 22, 2:46pm

Dan8267 says

It's what Bill Maher calls "zombie lies".

Yes an unimpeachable source of information, he is a mutt.

For someone who bitches and moans about Bill Maher, you haven't shown one thing wrong with anything he's ever said. More importantly, you have not countered anything said in the posted video.

Calling someone a bad source doesn't make it true. In fact, given your reputation, people should have confidence in Maher. You calling someone a bad source is like the KKK saying someone doesn't have a good racial agenda.

45

indigenous @ 2014 Jul 22, 2:49pm

Calling someone a bad source doesn't make it true.

It is my tautology...

I'm not motivated he is so full of shit it is hard to know where to start.

Give me one point he makes and I will demonstrate (to a normal person) what a mutt he is.

46

Dan8267 @ 2014 Jul 23, 10:29am

It is my tautology...

No, it's your contradiction. Your statement is always false.

47

indigenous @ 2014 Jul 23, 11:14am