patrick.net

E-man says

but now you're predicting the GDP growth to the thousand decimal digit. How lovely.

Take a calculator

add 4.3 + 3.1 + 2.6 - -2.1 divide by 4 and tell me what you get

SFace said: That's a permanent change as basegame stadium don't need that segment anymore. The clippers was sold for 2b bucks which was what a 10,000% return in 30 years.
Let's be careful about what is "permanent" and "normal". Cable/satellite providers in LA decided they don't need "that segment" anymore and many fans have been experiencing a Dodgers blackout on their subscription networks.

Logan Mohtashami says

E-man says

but now you're predicting the GDP growth to the thousand decimal digit. How lovely.

Take a calculator

add 4.3 + 3.1 + 2.6 - -2.1 divide by 4 and tell me what you get

Wow, that's your response? Anyone with 1/2 a brain would say about 2%. After all, it's all a guess work. No one with 1/2 a brain would say I guess it's 1.975%.

E-man says

Logan Mohtashami says

E-man says

but now you're predicting the GDP growth to the thousand decimal digit. How lovely.

Take a calculator

add 4.3 + 3.1 + 2.6 - -2.1 divide by 4 and tell me what you get

No one with 1/2 a brain would say I guess it's 1.975%.

Most of the engineers I work with would...........

E-man says

Anyone with 1/2 a brain would say about 2%

Then please categorize me with someone that has a half a brain, I truly and proudly belong in that group. In my half a brain world it will always be 1.975% never 2% :-)

GDP = C + I + G + (X-M)

May 7, 2013 exactly what I warned once the 2nd hand of housing inflation comes due to weak internals #DTI #LTI

ut/ …

http://loganmohtashami.com/2013/05/07/housing-mammoth-stuck-in-tar-has-bigger-problems-to-worry-about/

Logan Mohtashami says

I actually have a one on one meeting with Ivy Zelman soon, she has been the biggest housing bull in America, that will be a good conversation

Isn't being a housing bull pretty straight-forward? "We got people to pay bigger and bigger percentages of their income to their house. Why would they stop? If people in the Bay Area will pay 50% of their income on houses why not the rest of the country?"

Logan Mohtashami says

Then please categorize me with someone that has a half a brain, I truly and
proudly belong in that group. In my half a brain world it will always be 1.975%
never 2% :-)

GDP = C + I + G + (X-M)

I think you need a refresher on significant figures then.

tatupu70 says

I think you need a refresher on significant figures then.

FunTime says

Why would they stop? If people in the Bay Area will pay 50% of their income on houses why not the rest of the country?"

"San Francisco is experiencing its biggest housing crisis probably since World War II," says longtime housing advocate and Airbnb critic Calvin Welch. "There is a phenomenon of an extraordinary increase in the cost of housing."

Comparing San Francisco to the rest of the nation isn't a good apple to apple comparison due to the economic factors there compared to the rest of the nation. So the affordability crisis they have there is for the poor compared to the wealthy who have the $$$ to buy there. A lot Hot Tech and Finance money as well as foreign money as well.

The rent problem is very big there and why City Hall is trying do to what it can to slow down the pain

Logan Mohtashami says

Yep--that's my point.

tatupu70 says

Yep--that's my point.

That is 2nd revision Q2 GDP print which I estimated at 4.3% so I was off

Q1 -2.1
Q2 +4.3%
Q3 + 3.1%
Q4 +2.6%

That's how I get 1.975% total year GDP growth
So it wasn't reflecting a Q2 GDP print but a total for the entire year

Logan Mohtashami says

That is 2nd revision Q2 GDP print which I estimated at 4.3% so I was off

Q1 -2.1

Q2 +4.3%

Q3 + 3.1%

Q4 +2.6%

That's how I get 1.975% total year GDP growth

So it wasn't reflecting a Q2 GDP print but a total for the entire year

I'm not saying you got the wrong answer, just that you are using too many decimal points.

tatupu70 says

I'm not saying you got the wrong answer, just that you are using too many decimal points.

If I round it off it's 2%

I have to use the actual mathematical breakdown, I hear with what you're saying, I just can't say 2%. Just wired that way .
Here is a more of breakdown it came in a 4.17%