by zzyzzx follow (9)
« First « Previous Comments 25 - 46 of 46 Search these comments
She is cute and has a hot body. From a conservative family and somewhat book-wormish, but very well read. She has experience with girls.
Perhaps I'm giving her too much benefit of doubt for believing her virginity with men without provence (she does not claim to be a technical virgin, due to prior experimentation with girls with toys). In any case, I was not looking for a virgin; it just sprang on me.
(she does not claim to be a technical virgin, due to prior experimentation with girls with toys). In any case, I was not looking for a virgin; it just sprang on me.
Ok, that clears it up. She's into that whole bi-curious thing, which is now rampant at many Seven Sister and like colleges in the northeast. That's fine, because a lot of gals in those situations fear 'man as a predator' and probably feel better, being done by a woman with a strap-on dildo.
Yeah, what a waste. I was tempted to joke about being the worst kind of virgin: not technical virgin but no experience, but thought better of it than potentially offending her (although I think she would have appreciated the humor; she is that cool!). Personally, I do not care about female virginity one way or another. Just curious about woman's perspective for first time with men, and men's experience with women who are completely new to men.
RE: technical virgin
???
Does it depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is?
LOL. Technicality refers to the existence/preservation of a small piece of flesh; has been the case for thousands of years.
A proper study should include three control groups. 100 men slathered only with pussy juices from at least 20 different vaginas, 100 men slathered only with anal juices of at least 20 homosexual men, and a control group of 100 men who masturbate but have no sex per se and remain unslathered, and finally a group of 100 men who have sex of no kind whatsoever, but are allowed impure thoughts.
Isn't science great? Which group would you sign up for?
I don't want to get "slathered" That's like watching a baseball game from outside the stadium. I want to go INSIDE, and jump around.
By the way, first group please. Thanks.
LOL. Technicality refers to the existence/preservation of a small piece of flesh; has been the case for thousands of years.
Some Middle Eastern women like to patch it up again before they marry.
thanks for the lead...i just put down 5 g's for this one.
For those who don't know what a RealDoll is, here's a pictorial ...

Sleeping with more than 20 women protects men against prostate cance
But probably replaces it with a chance at urethral cancer through exposure to HPV.
I've seen this thing referenced every where today.
IMO the 20 thing just means they are unusually ACTIVE. And not just the splooging I mean they are up and at-em Macking on anything in a skirt. I had an older college buddy like that, like a fucking Energizer Bunny. If I was heading to bed after a date, he was finishing one and dialing up the second one. A second round of dancing sure! He's still like that and he's over 50 now.
I'm beginning to think that PatNet is for porn.
It's been therapy for me.
I'm seldom able to talk about this stuff with regular ppl. Many ppl are judgmental, conforming, and expect one to believe in dating, love, romance, etc.
I'm seldom able to talk about this stuff with regular ppl. Many ppl are judgmental,
Well it's a good thing you won't find those judgmental types of people at Patnet!
Here's we get both. In society, ppl put on acts, when faced with the fact that perhaps they're dating or married to the wrong person. Or that 'happily ever after' is mostly a myth but won't talk it, for fear of being outed or judged.
Sleeping with more than 20 women protects men against prostate cancer, a study has suggested.
Is that at the same time?
I'm so glad I read this, I have just 20 more vaginas to go to break the prostate health limit, and a few squalene imbedded RealDolls for good measure. I never would have had the ambition, otherwise. My only sexual experience was a post marital mercy fuck.
Is pussy juice called squalene or squealene, since they squeal so much?
I'm so glad I read this, I have just 20 more vaginas to go to break the prostate health limit, and a few squalene imbedded RealDolls for good measure.
So who's your favorite variant, Shauna, Wendy, Sally, Olivia, Rita, or Renata :-) ?
So who's your favorite variant, Shauna, Wendy, Sally, Olivia, Rita, or Renata :-) ?
Whichever one won't reject me outright.
So who's your favorite variant, Shauna, Wendy, Sally, Olivia, Rita, or Renata :-) ?
Whichever one won't reject me outright
This is RealDoll Inc, your wish is their command!
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
Howlene
HowlingFuckMene. Do RealDolls howl like wolves and jibber like chimps in heat?
I guess I should start with the RealDolls for practice. My wife says she might consider having sex with me again in 2040 if I am good.
Strange, I don't believe her.
I guess I should start with the RealDolls for practice. My wife says she might consider having sex with me again in 2040 if I am good.
Well, I'm definitely considering putting in an order. It's important to relief one's daily horny-ness, than in always waiting for that Canadian or Australian outing.
« First « Previous Comments 25 - 46 of 46 Search these comments
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/11192385/Sex-with-21-women-lowers-risk-of-prostate-cancer-academics-find.html
Sleeping with more than 20 women protects men against prostate cancer, a study has suggested.
Men who had slept with more than 20 women lowered their risk of developing cancer by almost one third, and were 19 per cent less likely to develop the most aggressive form.
In contrast, men who slept with 20 men doubled their risk of developing prostate cancer compared with men who have never had sex with another man.
Researchers at the University of Montreal believe that intercourse protects men, and men who are more promiscuous have more sex than those in monogamous relationships.
However, for homosexual men the benefit is lost because of the increased risk of picking up a sexually transmitted disease, and the damage to their bodies from intercourse. However gay men with just one partner are at no greater risk.
"It is possible that having many female sexual partners results in a higher frequency of ejaculations, whose protective effect against prostate cancer has been previously observed in cohort studies," said lead researcher Dr Marie-Elise Parent.
But when asked whether public health authorities should recommend men to sleep with many women in their lives Dr Parent added: "We're not there yet."
The study looked at more than 3,200 men over a four year period between 2005 and 2009.
Overall, men with prostate cancer were twice as likely to have a relative with cancer. However, the researchers were surprised to find that the number of sexual partners also affected the development of their cancer.
Men who said they had never had sexual intercourse were almost twice as likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer as those who said they had.
When a man has slept with more than 20 women during his lifetime there was a 28 per cent reduction in the risk of having prostate cancer, and a 19 per cent reduction for aggressive types of cancer.
On the other hand, those who have slept with more than 20 men are twice as likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer of all types compared to those who have never slept with a man.
And their risk of having a less aggressive prostate cancer increases by 500 per cent compared to those who have had only one male partner.
Dr Parent said that she could only formulate "highly speculative" hypotheses to explain the association.
"It could come from greater exposure to STIs, or it could be that anal intercourse produces physical trauma to the prostate," she said.
Previous studies have found that sexual intercourse may have a protective effect against prostate cancer because it reduces the concentration of carcinogenic crystal-like substances in the fluid of the prostate.
The study, published in the Journal Cancer Epidemiology is the first to find a link between the number of sexual partners and the risk of developing cancer.
"We were fortunate to have participants from Montreal who were comfortable talking about their sexuality, no matter what sexual experiences they have had, and this openness would probably not have been the same 20 or 30 years ago," said lead researcher Dr Marie-Elise Parent.
"Indeed, thanks to them, we now know that the number and type of partners must be taken into account to better understand the causes of prostate cancer."