« First « Previous Comments 41 - 52 of 52 Search these comments
Very quickly, in a pure free market, you will find people born into life with mud and sticks as their birth right, working for a very few, who control their lives entirely.
And you think, the government monopoly created by choosing a few from the pool of *exact same people* would somehow be on a moral high ground than the rest? And you call yourself "libertarian"?
What we need is government control from a centralized source where everyone can be completely controlled automatically according to policies of the Big Kahuna. This way inferior subjects such as demonstrated in the tawdry McD's video would simply be vaporized by automated robots similiar in appearance to
Hydrocarbon, but equipped with AF M135 guns to quickly dispatch any subversive activities. This way we shall truly no peace.
Without net neutrality, Americans could see certain Web sites slowed, blocked or sped up at the expense of others.
Another take on this is that the things they are worried about will simply fade away and take of themselves.
The thing that won't go away is the cities using control of the right away being used as an income stream.
The Fed will simply use this as another arm of some useless agency, like the energy department.
Another take on this is that the things they are worried about will simply fade away and take of themselves.
We are living in the best of all possible worlds.
If the government would only get out of the way, markets would solve everything through the miracle of self-correction, and everything would automatically ascend to the highest level of efficiency and rightness.
If the government would only get out of the way, markets would solve everything through the miracle of self-correction, and everything would automatically ascend to the highest level of efficiency and rightness.
Completely wrong we need the aforementioned Peace Custodian, modeled after your avatar to dispense peace, through the one genuine truth in the universe the M135 peace dispenser, and only then will we no peace...
Very quickly, in a pure free market, you will find people born into life with mud and sticks as their birth right, working for a very few, who control their lives entirely.
And you think, the government monopoly created by choosing a few from the pool of *exact same people* would somehow be on a moral high ground than the rest? And you call yourself "libertarian"?
Where did I suggest that?
Very quickly, in a pure free market, you will find people born into life with mud and sticks as their birth right, working for a very few, who control their lives entirely.
And you think, the government monopoly created by choosing a few from the pool of *exact same people* would somehow be on a moral high ground than the rest? And you call yourself "libertarian"?
Where did I suggest that?
See the quoted text.
That sounds like THREE choices to me?
Hmmm... sounds like THREE choices to me..
Hmmmm... Imagine that, THREE choices... Oops... Make that FOUR!
Even used car salesmen offer more choices.
Historically, which happens first, strong economy or strong government? (I'll give you a hint, one is the product of the other. This is NOT a chicken or the egg problem. One definitively precedes the other.)
I'll guess strong economy.
What's the answer?
I'll guess strong economy.
What's the answer?
Bzzzt - wrong.
Keystone Pipeline comes first, sillies. Only then will we have a strong economy!
I'll guess strong economy.
What's the answer?
Bzzzt - wrong.
Keystone Pipeline comes first, sillies. Only then will we have a strong economy!
How will we have a strong economy? After all, the oil from Canada will be refined and exported.
We could charge a toll.
Dsl is crap in my area as soon as I changed to timewarner it became 3 times faster for half the price. ATT is the ripoff.
ATT are monopolistic bastards I tell you. I remember when they merged with pac bell, got broken up, merged again. Every time they merge, they increase prices tremendously.
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 52 of 52 Search these comments
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/11/10/obama-wants-ban-on-internet-fast-lane-deals/
President Obama threw down the gauntlet Monday with cable companies and Internet providers by declaring they shouldn't be allowed to cut deals with online services like YouTube to move their content faster.
Good Man!
#politics