by Patrick ➕follow (61) ignore
« First « Previous Comments 105 - 137 of 137 Search these comments
Ives does not believe it would be possible for Apple (AAPL) to build a $1,000 iPhone in the U.S., with a domestically manufactured iPhone expected to sell for $3500.
For under $2000 I bought a used Dell Xeon 12 core workstation, put in 256 GB ECC RAM, set up a 4X1GB NVME RAID 0 main drive, along with a 10 TB backup.
The used hulk of the workstation itself cost $500.
WFT is with the insane price of phones?
Then Apple will pay the tariff and make less per phone
HeadSet says
Then Apple will pay the tariff and make less per phone
Sure. And many companies will do the same. Which means less profits. Which means less capital to invest in the re-shoring. Looks like we don't really want that manufacturing coming back after all....
stereotomy says
For under $2000 I bought a used Dell Xeon 12 core workstation, put in 256 GB ECC RAM, set up a 4X1GB NVME RAID 0 main drive, along with a 10 TB backup.
The used hulk of the workstation itself cost $500.
WFT is with the insane price of phones?
I doubt you would be OK with hauling around a phone the size of Dell workstation.
And many companies will do the same. Which means less profits.
Eric Holder says
stereotomy says
For under $2000 I bought a used Dell Xeon 12 core workstation, put in 256 GB ECC RAM, set up a 4X1GB NVME RAID 0 main drive, along with a 10 TB backup.
The used hulk of the workstation itself cost $500.
WFT is with the insane price of phones?
I doubt you would be OK with hauling around a phone the size of Dell workstation.
I doubt I'd enjoy code development on a computer the size of my smartphone with no physical keyboard to boot.
HeadSet says
Then Apple will pay the tariff and make less per phone
Sure. And many companies will do the same. Which means less profits. Which means less capital to invest in the re-shoring. Looks like we don't really want that manufacturing coming back after all....
, companies will not reshore unless they are allowed to keep production offshore? Catch 22, eh?
I wonder if Apple would just make 1/2 the profit it currently does if it manufactured in the USA.
I don't know what the profit margin is, but it must be high.
The labor cost of assembling an I-phone is about $25-30.
The cost at American wages is what $150-200 ?????-And that's before extra automation.
I think Apple has a little wiggle room as far as margins, R&D etc.
Eric Holder says
HeadSet says
Then Apple will pay the tariff and make less per phone
Sure. And many companies will do the same. Which means less profits. Which means less capital to invest in the re-shoring. Looks like we don't really want that manufacturing coming back after all....
So, companies will not reshore unless they are allowed to keep production offshore? Catch 22, eh?
they moved a lot to India from China, foxconn has factories in India. India gonna replace all US service jobs and manufacturing long term unless we fix this idiot path.
HeadSet says
Eric Holder says
HeadSet says
Then Apple will pay the tariff and make less per phone
Sure. And many companies will do the same. Which means less profits. Which means less capital to invest in the re-shoring. Looks like we don't really want that manufacturing coming back after all....
So, companies will not reshore unless they are allowed to keep production offshore? Catch 22, eh?
No catch: keep off-shore production and current level of revenues while their new factories are being built here. Smooth transition vs mad scramble.
Trump told you so.
REpro says
Trump told you so.
I'm surprised at the number of companies that had months and did absolutely nothing to move out of China or into the US.
REpro says
Trump told you so.
I'm surprised at the number of companies that had months and did absolutely nothing to move out of China or into the US.
zzyzzx says
REpro says
Trump told you so.
I'm surprised at the number of companies that had months and did absolutely nothing to move out of China or into the US.
It takes YEARS, not months. And he told the tariffs will be reciprocal, not based on some obscure formula with wrong numbers plugged in.
With 104% wig on everything there will be no 80% profit. And revenues will be in the toilet too. So they will have to build new factories while taking in significantly less $$. Great recipy! 🤡
but they won’t bring factories here unless it hurts not to.
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says
but they won’t bring factories here unless it hurts not to.
Or like what Biden did with the Chips Act, Green New Deal, etc
Reagan invested in industry as well as R&D (which benefited a lot of Silicon Valley) by significantly increasing Pentagon and NASA spending
I say take a page out of Reagan playbook to increase the manufacturing base, even have Defense Health Agency set up facilities (with major universities running them) to mass produce vital Rx like antibiotics and cancer drugs as well as mass produce medical equipment from CPAPs to intensive care unit (ICU) systems
not great if they just hire indians to replace us, while our taxes built them.
« First « Previous Comments 105 - 137 of 137 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,295,521 comments by 15,451 users - Blue, Eric Holder, Misc, Patrick, psychoh, zzyzzx online now