by _ follow (8)
« First « Previous Comments 34 - 66 of 66 Search these comments
I don't know if it's good but I don't see it as bad either. What's the racket? Why would it add to the inflation of a home?
It lowers the cost of a home, allowing more people to buy. It wasn't a very popular loan, except for those who couldn't afford a 30 year loan. As soon as they did the research on it, they killed it.
If you can't own a home with a 30 year amortized loan, probably shouldn't be buying a home
It lowers the cost of a home, allowing more people to buy. It wasn't a very popular loan, except for those who couldn't afford a 30 year loan.
And that's bad, why?
If you can't own a home with a 30 year amortized loan, probably shouldn't be buying a home
Again--why? People who can't afford homes, rent. How is a 40 year loan worse than renting?
Again--why? People who can't afford homes, rent. How is a 40 year loan worse than renting?
Nothing wrong with renting.
Also, the credit quality of 40 year amortization loans were awful. Talking about the bottom of the economic food chain.
Also the debt structure for some of these loans were fixed for short period as well.
It really wasn't a popular loan except for the poorest income and credit quality buyer
That's why not even the banks cared about losing it
You can't have a yield unless you fill the units.
I did not say it would be a good investment, in Austrian Terms a malivestment. Although a lot of it is healthcare related so it may work out well.
But the smaller commercial is a different story.
Which leads to the question of who the boomers are going to sell their houses to in order to retire?
Chris Martenson talks about that as well. The City Newspaper ran an article a while back IIRC by Joel Kotkin, in which he stated the real growth for the west will be in Utah & Colorado, as young families can buy there. I guess jobs will be created there as well?
Nothing wrong with renting.
Also, the credit quality of 40 year amortization loans were awful. Talking about the bottom of the economic food chain.
Also the debt structure for some of these loans were fixed for short period as well.
It really wasn't a popular loan except for the poorest income and credit quality buyer
That's why not even the banks cared about losing it
Sure--I understand that. Banks probably wouldn't want to make those loans to the folks that would apply. I just don't see why the US government would care.
Sure--I understand that. Banks probably wouldn't want to make those loans to the folks that would apply. I just don't see why the US government would care.
Some of those loans were sub prime debt structure nature types of products.
Fixed at a short term rate, then exploding higher. Some were interest only loans for a period of time which also has been banned by QM
So there is more to the story that a simple 40 year amortization loan like a 30 year amortization loan
Because they are currently holding the bag on the existing sub-prime loans now!
Whether or not this is true is irrelevant.
Whether or not this is true is irrelevant.
Also remember that lawsuits can come against the U.S government and banks from people who got sub standard loan products, in many suits for predatory lending there were 40 year loans giving.
So, the government and banks don't want anything to do with that type of loan. This is why under law you bank can't get legal production if you do a 40 year amortization loan
This is another factor why the U.S government and banks no longer do 40 year amortization loans
Also remember that lawsuits can come against the U.S government and banks from people who got sub standard loan products, in many suits for predatory lending there were 40 year loans giving.
So, the government and banks don't want anything to do with that type of loan. This is why under law you bank can't get legal production if you do a 40 year amortization loan
This is another factor why the U.S government and banks no longer do 40 year amortization loans
Is that because of the duration of the loan, or the amortization? I wouldn't think a straight 40 year loan would give rise to any lawsuits or predatory lending lawsuits.
Is that because of the duration of the loan, or the amortization? I wouldn't think a straight 40 year loan would give rise to any lawsuits or predatory lending lawsuits.
- Stated income loans
- Fixed for a 5 -10 year period and then amortized for 30 years after
I have never seen a pure 40 year amortization loan, who would really lend out money for 40 years fixed.
Also, 40 year loans had higher rates than traditional mortgages due to the amortization hit on pricing
It just wasn't a happening product. Not even the tight lending group is asking for that loan to come back, it has never been mentioned by any pro housing groups
Does the names Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ring any bells?
Yep. Still not relevant to the discussion. We're talking about private banks making loans.
Sorry, your graphics make no sense. It looks pretty but says absolutely nothing. When it says nothing, you know it is wrong. A bunch of confusing, circles, colors and death trap is just visual crap.
He is right, Logan. A picture is worth a thousand words, not a hundred thousand words. Keep it simple.
No he's not... If he can't read and understand Logan's chart, maybe he needs a six year old to explain it to him.
I bet even Logan gets confused by his own charts.
If you can't own a home with a 30 year amortized loan, probably shouldn't be buying a home
Again--why? People who can't afford homes, rent. How is a 40 year loan worse than renting?
Interest only loans are even more like rent. If you plan on moving in 5 years, interest only loans are not bad.
I bet even Logan gets confused by his own charts.
I post about 10-25 charts a day from all areas of economics. The Housing Charts are the easiest ones.
Come to my facebook page, I talk about all economic data her and abroad
I bet even Logan gets confused by his own charts.
I post about 10-25 charts a day from all areas of economics. The Housing Charts are the easiest ones.
Come to my facebook page, I talk about all economic data her and abroad
He he he. I just tried, and they want me to log into Facebook. I'm not on Facebook, but i'll make up a name and join.
By the way, I was an economics major, beyond masters. I love graphs, I even dreamt graphs. :) But now I am getting old. :(
If you like economics and historical photos in the evening that is what you see everyday
I bet even Logan gets confused by his own charts.
I post about 10-25 charts a day from all areas of economics. The Housing Charts are the easiest ones.
Come to my facebook page, I talk about all economic data her and abroad
You are cool, Logan. :)
What, no hot chicks??
My wife would say, how come you a lot Hot real estate female friends
What, no hot chicks??
My wife would say, how come you a lot Hot real estate female friends
Just tell her in Farsee..."no one as beautiful as you, Jaan" And then take her to that restaurant off Culver in Irvine that has belly dancing.....Caspian.? Women fall for it every time.
Caspian.
My wife is American and she has been to Caspian more than me and I lived in Irvine since 1989 and have been there just twice in 26 years.
Caspian.
My wife is American and she has been to Caspian more than me and I lived in Irvine since 1989 and have been there just twice in 26 years.
Is the belly dancing good? I want to take my wife there.
Even though apps where down week to week, they were still up YoY only because the bar is so low

Funny you think of belly dancing with the middle east? How things have changed.
Fannie Mae is out with its 2015 housing outlook and things are looking positive… sort of.
Housing is the cost of shelter to your own capacity to own the debt, nothing less, nothing more, none quarter asked and none taken
Outside out of that thesis I stay out of the marketing madness
American Banker is doing an article on me and if they take all my quotes in I put some really glaring facts on that capacity issue
« First « Previous Comments 34 - 66 of 66 Search these comments
http://loganmohtashami.com/2015/02/02/gauging-housing-demand-for-the-spring-of-2015-caution-in-the-wind/
#housing