« First « Previous Comments 18 - 57 of 171 Next » Last » Search these comments
If Russia hadn't bullied Poland, and others, so much, they wouldn't have to build this pipeline.
If Russia hadn't bullied Poland, and others, so much, they wouldn't have to build this pipeline.
Booger saysIf Russia hadn't bullied Poland, and others, so much, they wouldn't have to build this pipeline.
The idea behind these "bypass" pipelines is to open the door to full-blown attack on Ukraine. As things stand now they can't do it because the transit pipeline would most definitely be blown up in many places thus effectively ending Russian gas exports to Europe.
Because a pipeline in the Baltic can't be attacked???
Russians would not blow up pipeline in Baltic, but provide they have alternative means of gas transport they will blow up pipeline in Ukraine themselves (via their proxies in E. Ukraine).
What's stopping someone from attacking a pipeline in the Baltic?
rd6B saysRussians would not blow up pipeline in Baltic, but provide they have alternative means of gas transport they will blow up pipeline in Ukraine themselves (via their proxies in E. Ukraine).
What's stopping someone from attacking a pipeline in the Baltic?
What does this mean for the Iranian Oil Bourse? Will it still replace the USD in Energy Trades with the CoronaRenMenBi?
Yeah, have been reading about this at ZH for ten years now. Soon, very soon all oil trade will be denominated in [rubles], or [dinars], or [kauri seashells], and US of A economy will die a flaming death.
Gassyprom does not innovate. It is dependent on the market only. Just like OPEC.
Gazprom is a SOE. So it doesn't matter if it is profitable or not.
DIE, MOTHERFUCKING GAZPROM, FUCKING DIE ALREADY!
Eric Holder saysDIE, MOTHERFUCKING GAZPROM, FUCKING DIE ALREADY!
Hmmm... https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/OGZPY/?source=patrick.net
richwicks saysEric Holder saysDIE, MOTHERFUCKING GAZPROM, FUCKING DIE ALREADY!
Hmmm... https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/OGZPY/?source=patrick.net
Good start.
« First « Previous Comments 18 - 57 of 171 Next » Last » Search these comments
"
How Russian energy giant Gazprom lost $300bn.
It was not too long ago that Gazprom, Russia’s state-controlled energy conglomerate, was one of the Kremlin’s most powerful weapons. But those days now seem like a distant memory. Today, Gazprom is a financial shadow of its former self.
The speed of Gazprom’s decline is breathtaking. At its peak in May 2008, the company’s market capitalisation reached $367bn (£237bn), making it one of world’s most valuable companies, according to a survey compiled by the Financial Times. Only fellow Exxonmobile and PetroChina were worth more. Gazprom’s deputy chair Alexander Medvedev repeatedly predicted that within a decade the Russian energy giant could be worth $1 trillion.
That prediction now seems foolhardy. Since 2008, Gazprom’s value has plummeted. In early August it had a market capitalisation of $51bn – losing more than $300bn. No company among the world’s top 5,000 has suffered a bigger collapse, Bloomberg Business News reported in April 2014, and by the end of the year net income had fallen by an astonishing 86%.
Though share prices have rallied slightly since, indicators suggest Gazprom has further to fall. Lingering uncertainty raises questions about whether it can survive, with production continuing to tumble downward.
So what happened? Why is a company with the world’s largest gas reserves, operating in a country bordering China and the European Union – two of the world’s top energy consumers, performing so badly?"
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/07/gazprom-oil-company-share-price-collapse