« First « Previous Comments 35 - 74 of 171 Next » Last » Search these comments
Gassyprom does not innovate. It is dependent on the market only. Just like OPEC.
Gazprom is a SOE. So it doesn't matter if it is profitable or not.
DIE, MOTHERFUCKING GAZPROM, FUCKING DIE ALREADY!
Eric Holder saysDIE, MOTHERFUCKING GAZPROM, FUCKING DIE ALREADY!
Hmmm... https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/OGZPY/?source=patrick.net
richwicks saysEric Holder saysDIE, MOTHERFUCKING GAZPROM, FUCKING DIE ALREADY!
Hmmm... https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/OGZPY/?source=patrick.net
Good start.
You think Gazprom is going to go tits up?
China is the biggest customer for Russian Oil and Gas. $50B worth, twice that of the next European buyer.
"Power of Siberia" already pumps 38B CM3 of Gas to China. Soyuz East will be the same size as Nordstream.
This is just gas, not oil, coal, etc.
AmericanKulak saysChina is the biggest customer for Russian Oil and Gas. $50B worth, twice that of the next European buyer.
"Power of Siberia" already pumps 38B CM3 of Gas to China. Soyuz East will be the same size as Nordstream.
This is just gas, not oil, coal, etc.
Good: more market for US LNG.
Good: more market for US LNG.
Yeah! FUCK those Europeans! Double their energy costs!
richwicks saysGood: more market for US LNG.
Yeah! FUCK those Europeans! Double their energy costs!
Bullshit: US gas is very competetive. What's more - it's safe. I agree with Trump: we should have a strong political, military and economical alliance with Europe. Russia can have good relations with us if it chooses to behave like a proper European country or go be a China's bitch if it doesn't.
richwicks saysGood: more market for US LNG.
Yeah! FUCK those Europeans! Double their energy costs!
Bullshit: US gas is very competetive. What's more - it's safe.
I agree with Trump: we should have a strong political, military and economical alliance with Europe.
Russia can have good relations with us if it chooses to behave like a proper European country or go be a China's bitch if it doesn't.
BERLIN—The German government will temporarily take control of a key unit of Russian state-owned natural gas giant Gazprom PJSC in Germany
Accumulating Resources and/or Making things is wealth, that's the ultimate purpose of money - to buy those commodities and things.
By that measure, the US is not rich.
We also have the highest GDP in the world and our GDP per capita on a PPP basis is also very high.
There is about $15 trillion in dollar denominated debt outside the US, As the Fed raises interest rates from near zero, the repercussions will be huge as dollars will become rapidly more needed to pay the interest on this debt.
Italian Foreign Minister Luigi Di Mayo said that after the atrocities in Bucha, Italy will support sanctions against the russian gas
VILNIUS, Lithuania -- Lithuania says it has cut itself off entirely of gas imports from Russia, apparently becoming the first of the European Union's 27 nations using Russian gas to break its energy dependence upon Moscow.
“Seeking full energy independence from Russian gas, in response to Russia’s energy blackmail in Europe and the war in Ukraine, Lithuania has completely abandoned Russian gas,” Lithuania’s energy ministry said in a statement late Saturday, adding that the measure took effect in the beginning of April.
“Seeking full energy independence from Russian gas, in response to Russia’s energy blackmail in Europe and the war in Ukraine, Lithuania has completely abandoned Russian gas,” Lithuania’s energy ministry said in a statement late Saturday, adding that the measure took effect in the beginning of April.
not sure what this means, will this do anything for our gas prices? They haven't come down yet.
FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut saysnot sure what this means, will this do anything for our gas prices? They haven't come down yet.
No connection whatsoever.
« First « Previous Comments 35 - 74 of 171 Next » Last » Search these comments
"
How Russian energy giant Gazprom lost $300bn.
It was not too long ago that Gazprom, Russia’s state-controlled energy conglomerate, was one of the Kremlin’s most powerful weapons. But those days now seem like a distant memory. Today, Gazprom is a financial shadow of its former self.
The speed of Gazprom’s decline is breathtaking. At its peak in May 2008, the company’s market capitalisation reached $367bn (£237bn), making it one of world’s most valuable companies, according to a survey compiled by the Financial Times. Only fellow Exxonmobile and PetroChina were worth more. Gazprom’s deputy chair Alexander Medvedev repeatedly predicted that within a decade the Russian energy giant could be worth $1 trillion.
That prediction now seems foolhardy. Since 2008, Gazprom’s value has plummeted. In early August it had a market capitalisation of $51bn – losing more than $300bn. No company among the world’s top 5,000 has suffered a bigger collapse, Bloomberg Business News reported in April 2014, and by the end of the year net income had fallen by an astonishing 86%.
Though share prices have rallied slightly since, indicators suggest Gazprom has further to fall. Lingering uncertainty raises questions about whether it can survive, with production continuing to tumble downward.
So what happened? Why is a company with the world’s largest gas reserves, operating in a country bordering China and the European Union – two of the world’s top energy consumers, performing so badly?"
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/07/gazprom-oil-company-share-price-collapse