« First « Previous Comments 57 - 96 of 170 Next » Last » Search these comments
richwicks saysEric Holder saysDIE, MOTHERFUCKING GAZPROM, FUCKING DIE ALREADY!
Hmmm... https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/OGZPY/?source=patrick.net
Good start.
You think Gazprom is going to go tits up?
China is the biggest customer for Russian Oil and Gas. $50B worth, twice that of the next European buyer.
"Power of Siberia" already pumps 38B CM3 of Gas to China. Soyuz East will be the same size as Nordstream.
This is just gas, not oil, coal, etc.
AmericanKulak saysChina is the biggest customer for Russian Oil and Gas. $50B worth, twice that of the next European buyer.
"Power of Siberia" already pumps 38B CM3 of Gas to China. Soyuz East will be the same size as Nordstream.
This is just gas, not oil, coal, etc.
Good: more market for US LNG.
Good: more market for US LNG.
Yeah! FUCK those Europeans! Double their energy costs!
richwicks saysGood: more market for US LNG.
Yeah! FUCK those Europeans! Double their energy costs!
Bullshit: US gas is very competetive. What's more - it's safe. I agree with Trump: we should have a strong political, military and economical alliance with Europe. Russia can have good relations with us if it chooses to behave like a proper European country or go be a China's bitch if it doesn't.
richwicks saysGood: more market for US LNG.
Yeah! FUCK those Europeans! Double their energy costs!
Bullshit: US gas is very competetive. What's more - it's safe.
I agree with Trump: we should have a strong political, military and economical alliance with Europe.
Russia can have good relations with us if it chooses to behave like a proper European country or go be a China's bitch if it doesn't.
BERLIN—The German government will temporarily take control of a key unit of Russian state-owned natural gas giant Gazprom PJSC in Germany
Accumulating Resources and/or Making things is wealth, that's the ultimate purpose of money - to buy those commodities and things.
By that measure, the US is not rich.
We also have the highest GDP in the world and our GDP per capita on a PPP basis is also very high.
There is about $15 trillion in dollar denominated debt outside the US, As the Fed raises interest rates from near zero, the repercussions will be huge as dollars will become rapidly more needed to pay the interest on this debt.
Italian Foreign Minister Luigi Di Mayo said that after the atrocities in Bucha, Italy will support sanctions against the russian gas
VILNIUS, Lithuania -- Lithuania says it has cut itself off entirely of gas imports from Russia, apparently becoming the first of the European Union's 27 nations using Russian gas to break its energy dependence upon Moscow.
“Seeking full energy independence from Russian gas, in response to Russia’s energy blackmail in Europe and the war in Ukraine, Lithuania has completely abandoned Russian gas,” Lithuania’s energy ministry said in a statement late Saturday, adding that the measure took effect in the beginning of April.
“Seeking full energy independence from Russian gas, in response to Russia’s energy blackmail in Europe and the war in Ukraine, Lithuania has completely abandoned Russian gas,” Lithuania’s energy ministry said in a statement late Saturday, adding that the measure took effect in the beginning of April.
not sure what this means, will this do anything for our gas prices? They haven't come down yet.
FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut saysnot sure what this means, will this do anything for our gas prices? They haven't come down yet.
No connection whatsoever.
fuck over people who save.
Kyiv Halts Russian Gas Shipments Through Key Hub
Russian gas flows to Europe via Ukraine fell by a quarter on May 11 after Kyiv announced that it would stop Russian shipments through its key Novopskov hub in the east, blaming interference by Russian forces in the region.
It is the first time exports have been disrupted since Moscow launched its unprovoked invasion of Ukraine. Despite the war, Ukraine has remained a major transit route for Russian gas to Europe.
Russia's state-controlled energy giant Gazprom, which has a monopoly on Moscow's gas exports by pipeline, said it was still shipping gas to Europe via Ukraine, but volumes were seen at 72 million cubic meters (mcm) on May 11, down from 95.8 mcm the previous day.
since Moscow launched its unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.
DooDahMan sayssince Moscow launched its unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.
Adding biased phrases like "unprovoked" to the article show that the author is biased and the article is thus unreliable.
HeadSet says
DooDahMan sayssince Moscow launched its unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.
Adding biased phrases like "unprovoked" to the article show that the author is biased and the article is thus unreliable.
These are not biased words but factual description
That's not true. Russia has been trying to negotiate with Ukraine for 8 solid years.There's one thing on patnet that doesn't change: puturds running their little propaganda campaign.
richwicks saysThat's not true. Russia has been trying to negotiate with Ukraine for 8 solid years.There's one thing on patnet that doesn't change: puturds running their little propaganda campaign.
How exactly did they negotiate? By installing their puppet Yanukovitch?
By taking over Crimea?
By sending their goons to Donetsk/Lugansk? Or by leading hybrid war for 8 years?
Will you actually be stupid enough to claim that non of this happened?
If I didn't know your MO I'd feel sorry for someone so misinformed. But since I know your MO, the feeling is that of disgust.
How exactly did they negotiate? By installing their puppet Yanukovitch? By taking over Crimea? By sending their goons to Donetsk/Lugansk? Or by leading hybrid war for 8 years?
They should come to the table, negotiate a deal and make it clear that this is about the separatist regions only and any future aggression deviating from the deal and expanding will be met with force.
This isn't about saving lives,
Just demonstrate I'm incorrect. You're again wasting your time insulting me.I've done it, and repeatedly. Your typical pattern is 1) to pretend that it didn't happen, 2) when referred back demand quotes 3) when receive quote ignore or divert to another topic.
There was no conflict when their puppet Yanukovitch was in power.I think you are saying that Russian puppets are good because Russia is happy and there's no conflict with Russia. In other words, Russia should be able to install it's puppets, let you live in return, and it's a fair compromise. If anyone ever needs proof that you are Putler's propaganda troll, this is a good reference point.
Well you got REAL war now.And it's a continuation of the hybrid war they started in 2014. BOTH were started by Russia. "It was so avoidable, we really should've been nicer to that crocodile." Pathetic.
I'm pointing out none of this would have happened if the US didn't overthrow Ukraine in 2014.I already pointed out that your perpetual repetition of a false doesn't make it true. I explained why. You couldn't argue against the explanation, so you just dismissed it and engaged "whack-a-mole" mode.
I don't believe my government because they are proven and habitual liars. Why do you believe anything the US government says?
richwicks saysJust demonstrate I'm incorrect. You're again wasting your time insulting me.I've done it, and repeatedly.
Quote me - provide a link.I dedicated a post to your use of grey propaganda, with a specific example. Are you saying that you don't remember? Yes or no?
Your "proof" is you said I was wrong and insinuated I was having anal sex with Putin.I did no such thing, let's be clear about who said what. My statement was that your tongue is stuck in a part of Putin's body. There was nothing about anal sex. Furthermore, I didn't use it as a proof. It was an inference from your observed endearment of Putler.
richwicks saysThis isn't about saving lives,
Clearly it isn't. Let Europe deal with it
engage in diplomacy only and only engage in military actions and aid if a Nato member is attacked.
The US has been broke for a while (like plenty of other countries), hence the fiery printing and massive inflation and shortages.
richwicks saysQuote me - provide a link.I dedicated a post to your use of grey propaganda,
No quote, no link.Are you saying that you don't remember? Yes or no?
...not because I learn anything from you at this point.
richwicks saysNo quote, no link.Are you saying that you don't remember? Yes or no?
Patrick - reveal this comment: https://patrick.net/post/1344825?start=27#comment-1837824
@richwicks ^^
Quote me, provide a link, refresh my memory.Here you go, dear senile: https://patrick.net/post/1344073?start=9#comment-1826473
« First « Previous Comments 57 - 96 of 170 Next » Last » Search these comments
"
How Russian energy giant Gazprom lost $300bn.
It was not too long ago that Gazprom, Russia’s state-controlled energy conglomerate, was one of the Kremlin’s most powerful weapons. But those days now seem like a distant memory. Today, Gazprom is a financial shadow of its former self.
The speed of Gazprom’s decline is breathtaking. At its peak in May 2008, the company’s market capitalisation reached $367bn (£237bn), making it one of world’s most valuable companies, according to a survey compiled by the Financial Times. Only fellow Exxonmobile and PetroChina were worth more. Gazprom’s deputy chair Alexander Medvedev repeatedly predicted that within a decade the Russian energy giant could be worth $1 trillion.
That prediction now seems foolhardy. Since 2008, Gazprom’s value has plummeted. In early August it had a market capitalisation of $51bn – losing more than $300bn. No company among the world’s top 5,000 has suffered a bigger collapse, Bloomberg Business News reported in April 2014, and by the end of the year net income had fallen by an astonishing 86%.
Though share prices have rallied slightly since, indicators suggest Gazprom has further to fall. Lingering uncertainty raises questions about whether it can survive, with production continuing to tumble downward.
So what happened? Why is a company with the world’s largest gas reserves, operating in a country bordering China and the European Union – two of the world’s top energy consumers, performing so badly?"
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/07/gazprom-oil-company-share-price-collapse