« First « Previous Comments 68 - 69 of 69 Search these comments
And what does this have to do with you dodging a question where you are bitching about them having 2 trillion?
FWayne - I am not dodging any question. A bank that has assets over 2 trillion, with over 3000 subsidiaries, and one that was bailed out during 2008 crisis -- could potentially be at risk of failing again. This risk is non-zero, as the bank itself prepares a living will to the Federal Reserve. You asked why is this the tax payer's problem -- and I gave a clear explanation. The financial institutions have been bailed out before and there was mishandling during these bailouts. Are you not concerned about the moral hazard perpetuated by these bailouts? Or do you want me to explain what moral hazard means? LOL.
And that has to do what with Republicans vs. Democrats? Because your whole whining above only said something about "Republicans are evil, look at how much some banks have.". If that's not your point, you need to make the worlds more clear, whats in your head is not whats in the post.
« First « Previous Comments 68 - 69 of 69 Search these comments
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/oliver-stone/why-im-for-bernie-sanders_b_9576984.html?1459369253=
#politics