Please log in to view images

« prev   random   next »

2
0

CRA and Countrywide

By Entitlemented follow Entitlemented   2016 Apr 26, 5:41pm 2,915 views   13 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    


http://www.businessinsider.com/three-ways-the-cra-pushed-countrywide-to-lower-lending-standards-2009-6

When we discuss the role of the Community Reinvestment Act and other fair lending rules in contributing to lax lending standards, people bent on exonerating the CRA often point out that many of the questionable loans were made by non-depository mortgage companies not covered by the CRA. Barry Ritholtz has been a prominent critic of the theory that the CRA has some culpability for lax lending.

1   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (49)   2016 Apr 26, 6:00pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Exactly!

Mozilo read the CRA and started laughing hysterically, turned criminally insane and began constructing one of the greatest financial services bust out schemes of the age.

The Red Cross caused Jeffrey Dahmer, too!

2   NoCoupForYou   ignore (4)   2016 Apr 26, 6:45pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Oh Jesus Christ, not the delayed 30+ year CRA Red Herring Bullshit again. Nevermind the vast majority of homes that fired off the financial crisis were SFHs owned by White Middle Class People in the Suburbs.

3   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (49)   2016 Apr 26, 7:59pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Really.

If the CRA were rewritten as a hunting guide for negroes (IN THE BACK! THE WHOLE FUCKING MAGAZINE, HERO!) nothing would have changed.

Mozilo was a criminally insane fuck from the day he was born. It takes a lot of work to make a company as corrupt as CW. BofA had a guarantee they would not go down to absorb the monstrous pornography in the CW portfolio. Everyone in the industry knew the CW notes were complete and utter fucking trash, underwriting that would be comedic if the consequence weren't so awfully tragic..

4   indigenous   ignore (0)   2016 Apr 27, 6:55am     ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Yup this is what I have read as well.

There has never been a bubble in history that was not caused by loose money policies.

Just as Mozillo had blind spots, so do the posters on this thread who work in banking.

"Of course, Angelo Mozillo didn't need very much prompting on this score. He believed exactly what the CRA regulators believed: that these lax lending practices were the wave of the future, democratizing the glories of home ownership."

The myth they espouse to is the one that says big evil business causes all the trouble.

5   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (49)   2016 Apr 27, 9:01am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

indigenous says

Just as Mozillo had blind spots

indigenous says

He believed exactly what the CRA regulators believed

Wow, just fucking wow, talking about Mozilo as if he had any kind of belief system is like talking about a piranha having a philosophy of culinary arts.

6   HydroCabron   ignore (1)   2016 Apr 27, 9:42am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

indigenous says

There has never been a bubble in history that was not caused by loose money policies.

Mozilla was a doe-eyed moist and tender nubile idealist when CRA lured him into a speakeasy for just one innocent sip of that sweet bathtub hooch.

Amidst the jazz, with its racy but unstated implications of decadent excess, and the flappers and chorus girls, all so new to an innocent like him, he lost his bearings.

Mozilla could not have understood the implications of these devil's instruments. He had no background in lending risk assessment, and no reason to take an interest in it, merely having founded a mortgage lending company.

7   indigenous   ignore (0)   2016 Apr 27, 12:31pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

As stated the two posters have blind spots to the intent of the article.

8   HydroCabron   ignore (1)   2016 Apr 27, 1:54pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

indigenous says

As stated the two posters have blind spots to the intent of the article.

And posting it twice makes your "argument" even stronger.

Mozilla could have just resigned, or sold CountryWide, or refused to sell shit mortgages. At no point was he under physical compulsion to originate shit.

He chose to sell shit. The government put no gun to his head.

9   tatupu70   ignore (0)   2016 Apr 27, 2:11pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I don't understand this argument at all. The government says you must give bad loans to poor people. Therefore you decide to give even crappier loans to non-poor people without any government incentives? On what planet does that make sense?

10   indigenous   ignore (0)   2016 Apr 27, 4:41pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HydroCabron says

And posting it twice makes your "argument" even stronger.

Yes, I posted the exact same thing twice because I enjoy reading my posts.

HydroCabron says

The government put no gun to his head.

Of course the government had nothing to do with it. They did not enable Mozilla at all, oh wait that is what the article is saying though? I guess it is not possible to sound the depths of this conundrum...

11   HydroCabron   ignore (1)   2016 Apr 27, 5:31pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

No way did the government create Mozilla.

He came from spores.

12   indigenous   ignore (0)   2016 Apr 27, 5:57pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

That's right without the government Dworkin would have just been another IHL. Government injustices have created an opportunity for Trump.


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions