Comments 1 - 14 of 14 Search these comments
Mr. Khan, 45, has had a successful career in the Labour Party
Pretty much says it all.
He called Moderate Muslims "Uncle Toms."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/04/labour-plunged-into-fresh-race-row-as-london-mayoral-candidate-s/
Defended 9/11 Terrorists
Wow that got my attention, so I followed the links. They don't quite support the headline though:
It's a pity when people exaggerate because it undermines the credibility of more serious concerns about Khan.
The Economist has coverage here:
"A capital decision
Sadiq Khan will be London’s new mayor
THE official declaration has not yet taken place, but already it is arithmetically certain that Sadiq Khan has won London’s election and will be the capital’s new mayor. With over 90% of ballots counted he leads Zac Goldsmith, his Tory rival, by 44% to 35%. The decisiveness of his victory is easy enough to understand. London is a Labour city; in Britain, as across northern Europe, the centre-left vote has held up better in metropolitan areas than elsewhere.
***
Mr Khan had, for example, appeared on platforms with Suliman Gani, a radical imam. Yet as a prominent British Muslim, a civil liberties lawyer and a big figure in London politics (Mr Goldsmith, too, had appeared alongside Mr Gani), it is only natural that Mr Khan should have crossed paths with such characters. Dark Tory warnings about his sympathies looked paranoid when set against his broadly liberal record: the MP for Tooting had supported gay marriage (for which he received death threats), fought to keep a local pub open and had condemned recent incidents of anti-Semitism in Labour with a vigour conspicuously unmatched by its leadership."
OK, so he may have personally a good record at the present time, when London does not yet have enough Muslims to impose Sharia, but he believes in a religion that commands him to impose Sharia when that becomes possible there. London has more than 10% Muslims, so if we assume that most Muslims voted for Khan, then that implies most non-Muslims voted against him. The non-Muslims have good reason to feel concerned: installing Muslims in charge of the police can build the foundation for what happened to Hans Litten and what is currently happening in Bangladesh, where groups of Muslim vigilantes ("Sharia patrols") murder blasphemers and are never prosecuted. London endured a year of Sharia patrols, which the police did little about until they provoked a backlash of Christian patrols. The London Sharia patrols didn't murder anyone there as far as I know, but they advocate a doctrine that commands them to murder people, and one of their alumni is reportedly the "New Jihadi John" chopping off Britons' heads on video. Now the Mayor believes in that doctrine also.
London bridge is falling down, falling down!!!
They really are taking over Europe. It's not a myth anymore.
Which is sad because it's legal to f*ck hoes in London. Damn, one can take seminars at London U (sorry Univ of London, according to dickless bob, who's jealous because he's a loser state univ graduate in America), get hammered at the West End, and bang a hoe.
Look at all those White Britons, probably all UKIP voters and EDL members.
So this is in addition to Rotherham, Rochdale, Peterborough, Derby, etc. rape and grooming gangs with hundreds of victims and a willfully blind police and social worker establishment in every case (there are more than the ones I listed, too)
Heard on the radio.....More than 1 in 8 London residents are Muslim. They must have voted in droves.
A step towards sharia laws. Nothing to worry about.
[Oxfordshire] is in addition to Rotherham, Rochdale, Peterborough, Derby, etc
Wow, yet again.
Rotherham:
Rochdale:
They refused to believe that race was an issue even though dozens of young, white girls were being specifically targeted and groomed for sex by older Pakistani men.
Derby:
Mohammed Liaqat, 28, and Abid Saddique, 27, were found guilty at a trial in November of charges including rape.
At Nottingham Crown Court, Saddique was jailed for at least 11 years and Liaqat for a minimum of eight.
***
There were 26 girls involved in the case, with the youngest 12 and the oldest 18.
***
A report published after the gang was convicted said there were "missed opportunities" by agencies to help the girls."
That's an estimated 2,000 children in only those four reports. It seems weird the reports tend to say "Asian", a description that could theoretically apply to more than 30% of the human race, when the perpetrators turn out to be almost always Pakistani Muslims, which narrows it down to 2%.
Peterborough seems though an exception:
London Elects a Muslim Mayor Who Defended 9/11 Terrorists
Zacarias Moussaoui refused legal consul and tried defended himself at trial. The judge finally assigned a team of lawyers to defend him. US lawyers, nothing to do with Kahn. Kahn is a British lawyer, he can't defend anyone in a US court. Other than in the blogsphere circular story no one seems to be able to come up with what this alleged "consulting team" was or who was on it. The story that I remember from the time, was Moussaoui asked Kahn to investigate Ahmed. Kahn came over but was never able to meet Moussaoui or see any court papers.
Pretty long stretch of the imagination to connect those dots even for you and the usual suspects.
Pretty long stretch of the imagination to connect those dots even for you and the usual suspects.
John Adams defended British soldiers in the Boston Massacre trial.
One of the stranger aspects of the "only liberals are unconstitutional/unpatriotic/un-American" crowd is their consistent discomprehension of how institutions in a democratic society with limited government are supposed to work.
Serving as a lawyer for scumbags is not a failing. It's a noble act, to be respected in any society which favors limited government.
But if you want to lynch people, lawyers and courts just get in the way.
http://www.meforum.org/5994/london-mayor-election