1
0

It's a scientific fact: Taylor Swift is the ideal woman


               
2016 May 17, 10:57am   1,006 views  1 comment

by Dan8267   follow (4)  

Dibbs.

New Study Says Guys Prefer Slim Girls Like Taylor Swift Than Curvier Kim Kardashian Types

The results from the comprehensive research found that both men and women preferred a thin girl with long legs like Taylor Swift as opposed to a gal with a fat ass and big titties like Kim Kardashian.

The methodical fact-finding mission by researchers at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia discovered that the ideal woman was taller in height and longer in leg rather than a bigger bum and busty chest.

And yes, it's science. Why men find thinner women attractive: Scientists say 'evolutionary fitness' makes slimmer females more appealing

Men find thinner women attractive because they associate their body shape with youth, fertility and a lower risk of disease.

This is according to a new study by the University of Aberdeen which found 'evolutionary fitness' determines what men find appealing.

This contradicts earlier theories which suggest people are drawn to body types with more fat as they could historically survive a famine.

In an earlier study that backs up the most recent claims, scientists discovered the ideal female body shape is leggy, tall and thin like Taylor Swift

Of course, this is obvious to most men. But god forbid that it would be confirmed by science.

Leftist news outlets will use facts when backing up a justifiable political position, like raising the minimum wage or passing climate change policies, because the facts support rational policies. However, the same leftist news outlets will resort to attack articles with no evidence to attempt to discredit legitimate studies that do not support the left's arbitrary and often deplorable culture. Take, for example, the Huffington Post article Skinny Women Are Better, Says Douchey Article No One Asked For. Yeah, that title doesn't indicate irrational bias.

Well, f**k. Here I was eating Cheerios specifically to beef up my ass in hopes of appearing attractive to “real” men. How devastating to discover I've been doing it all wrong. RIP, Cheerios.

In the article, author Ian Lang attempts to mask douchebaggery with evolution, explaining that we used to think that men love curves because they imply that women aren't literally starving (i.e. it's not a famine) and can pop out a child at any given time. (I mean, women, what else are they good for, amirite?) That is, until science told us that men actually dig skinny chicks — which was super important for AskMen to report on, because evaluating women's bodies under the lens of the male gaze is just a fun Friday activity.

And this is written by Managing Editor Jessica Samakow. One would expect a little bit of professionalism from a managing editor. FYI, that's the senior member of a publication's management team who reports directly to the Editor in Chief, the big cheese. The managing editor basically controls what kind of editorials are written and what kinds are not. They have huge influence on an newspaper's editorial section.

The article that Samaokow is bitching about -- and I say bitching because criticizing and even complaining about would be terms that would imply some level of constructiveness and rationality -- is Female Attractiveness Linked To Lower Body Fat, a short article which references the peer-reviewed scientific paper The relationship of female physical attractiveness to body fatness.

The scientific paper, which Samaokow does not even dare address because doing so would reveal how much of a fool she is, was written by quite a few scientists, both males and females.

Guanlin Wang, Kurosh Djafarian, Chima A. Egedigwe, Asmaa El Hamdouchi, Robert Ojiambo, Harris Ramuth, Sandra Johanna Wallner-Liebmann, Sonja Lackner, Adama Diouf, Justina Sauciuvenaite, Catherine Hambly, Lobke M. Vaanholt9, Mark D. Faries, John R. Speakman​

Idiots like Jessica Samakow only end up hurting their causes be demonstrating irrational behavior. Every subject matter is subject to scientific study, the results of which are not influenced by your arbitrary cultural preferences. Nature is what it is, not what you think it should be. You may want men to prefer fat women, but they do not. Admitting this does not make a person sexist; it makes him or her honest. And who is Jessica Samaokow to dictate what men should want in a romantic partner? Does Samaokow seek smelly homeless guys for partners? If not, she's a despicable hypocrite.

Understanding reality is the basis of all wisdom. To chastise honest reporting of scientific facts is to attack wisdom and to promote foolishness.

Oh, and Taylor Swift isn't just the ideal woman physically, she's also the ideal woman in terms of being a person. Her mind, her personality, her talent, her morality, and her kindness is exactly what makes her what men want to marry instead of you, Jessica.

#politics

Comments 1 - 1 of 1        Search these comments

1   HydroCabron   2016 May 17, 11:04am  

Taylor Swift and Kim Kardashian are both disgusting, materialistic morally-backward trash.

Kardashian is the spoiled daughter of an OJ lawyer. Swift is the spawn of bankers.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste