patrick.net

I get all my news from virtual,conservative fish wrappers.

The Quinnipiac University poll:
Did they only let sewer slime vote?
Did they only have one name on the ballot,Obama?
Why didn't they include G.W.Bush?
I only make life or death decisions after reading polls.

Stick with me & one's trolling will see great improvement.

Worse that W? Unbelievable!

Blurtman says

Worse that W? Unbelievable!

.
LOL-my thoughts exactly. Only reason, I voted for this idjit, the first time-was because of W.

Back then I was mostly leaning dem, but would vote an occasional R. Now I am the other way around. This election may be my 1st straight ticket ever- R of course.

I think we are close to the edge and need soemone practical and wean off the welfare culture. The left has jumped off the deep end and want to drag the rest of us down with them-at our expense of course. Once we descend into 3rd world status-it will be very difficult to get back.

You mean World's wose "Leader" since WWII.

There has never been a US President THIS bad.

Are a lot of these the same people that think a crude, obnoxious, reality show star, hate and violence inciting, nationalist, narcissist, real estate investor should be President?

I just don't see what Obama has done that's so evil.

At least he didn't start any wars.

I think people dislike him only because of what he represents, namely a liberal elite that does not have their interests in mind.

rando says

I just don't see what Obama has done that's so evil.

Then you ain't looking.

Obama care will leave a legacy of reduced healthcare and increased healthcare expense.

Dodd Frank is like Sarbanes Oxley on steroids and best of all will do nothing about what it was supposed to fix.

He endorsed common core which also will have a legacy of even more incompetent children.

If he has his way TPP will be passed which is more monopoly than even NAFTA

Then there is regulation:

PCGyver says

And I'm pretty sure W's approved rating was much lower by his last year in office

Nobody had any expectations for W. He was from an elite family-was a failure at business and rode his daddy's coattails. He sounded and acted like a dumb twit.

Obama on the other hand is a constitutional scholar-who has used the Espionage act more than all presidents combined. He is trying to ram through the TPP-after negotiating it secretly. Then this whole Muslim thing is just ridiculous-and calling Hillary the most qualified candidate evah????

It is just if I wanted a republican-I will vote for a repub. Our politics is so crazy, we have a billioanre beingt he champion of the common man. methinks Obozo is doing what he is doing, so he can model Hilalry's foundation and earn 100s of millions of dollars through the foundation/charity.

I would much rather have a president who is a crook than one who is an ideologue.

My expectations for the Donald are only that he never apologizes for any political incorrectness.

The moment he apologizes, I will hate him.

rando says

My expectations for the Donald are only that he never apologizes for any political incorrectness.

And that beats the shit out of the alternative.

lostand confused says

LOL-my thoughts exactly

Recency bias.

I don't get it.

Is not politically correct always good ?

Blurtman says

Recency bias

Nah Bush is stupid and a nutjob. But Obozo is devious, cunning and a wolf in sheep's clothing.

indigenous says

I would much rather have a president who is a crook than one who is an ideologue.

At least you have the self-awareness to know you shouldn't be president.

I'd say that GWB was worse by a decent margin.

indigenous says

Then there is regulation:

That list is so scary, until you consider the cost of the Paul Ryan debt-ceiling tantrums, which cost the taxpayers more than all that put together.

So cute when both-sides-are-the-same libertarian ideologues repeat straight Republican propaganda!

rando says

At least he didn't start any wars.

I think people dislike him only because of what he represents, namely a liberal elite that does not have their interests in mind.

Obama is ten times more sneaky than Bush.
Bush went to Congress and the UN and NATO for every single action he took, he never unilaterally took military actions.

If you believe that, then you either believe Obama THINKS he is helping the (Good Guys), when he drops 50 tons of USA grade tactical assault hardware in a war zone controlled by the most violent ruthless cutthroats since the Barbary Coast Pirates, to three people. And you then also have to believe that Obama believed that those three Billy Bad Asses would have been able to fend off an Army of 50,000 ISIS militia or more. An army so strong they were able to topple the sitting President and make him flee. You would then have to believe that even after Putin bombing the shit out of the whole region just days after that air Drop. Even though ISIS spread and threat to neighboring countries dropped over 70%, Obama claimed Putin bombed civilians and was protecting Bashar al-Assad sympathizers. If you do believe that then you don't understand that Obama's freedom fighters against al-Assad, and ISIS is, was the same group of people. The same group of people that started in Libya that got support from Hillary to off Qaddafi.

Or you are just as gullible as his thinktank said you would be.