patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,309,755 comments by 15,534 users - Al_Sharpton_for_President, WookieMan, zzyzzx online now
invite responseComments 1 - 21 of 21 Search these comments
FNWGMOBDVZXDNW
2016 Jul 25, 6:18pm
Trump's loans are all coming from Russia. Therefore, Russia bankrolled his campaign. Without Russian money, he wouldn't have his DC hotel, much less a presidential campaign.
MisdemeanorRebel
2016 Jul 25, 6:33pm
Trump's loans are all coming from Russia.
If there was any evidence that "ALL" of Trump's loans came from Russia, the media would have bleated this out endlessly.
This is just an attempt to distract the public by pointing to the likely messenger and associate Trump with it. If memory serves I predicted this before on this board, not that you had to be a genius to figure out what Hillary would do in such a circumstance. However, the ultimate author of these emails was the DNC and Hillary.
I'd be shocked if the 33,000 personal emails that are only about Hillary's Dinner Plans exist, and that many, many people have them already. It's just a matter of time.
Shaman
2016 Jul 25, 7:20pm
How about this: Hillary's campaign donations are coming from Saudi Arabia.
Even if Trump was getting help from Putin, that would be vastly more palatable than the scarlet whore's choice of backers. Let's see:
A)Saudis: corrupt, rich, dictators who spread Islamist views of the west, finance terrors attacks, created and armed ISIS, hate human rights, have no such thing as gender equality, hang gays, and hate America.
B) Russia: pragmatic, largely democratic leaders who support the Christian view of the world, have a rather neutral vision on human rights, have gender equality, tolerate gays, and want to be friends with America.
Yah I'm going with Russia.
Sorry WaterBastard.
FNWGMOBDVZXDNW
2016 Jul 25, 7:28pm
I'd be shocked if the 33,000 personal emails that are only about Hillary's Dinner Plans exist, and that many, many people have them already. It's just a matter of time.
Hopefully, the leaky wiki folks are equal opportunity ass fuckers, and will treat us to Donald's tax forms this fall. Well, actually I'm not hoping that our election hinges on what assange feels like leaking and when.
HydroCabron
2016 Jul 25, 7:30pm
This is just an attempt to distract the public by pointing to the likely messenger and associate Trump with i
What do your coworkers in St. Pete say, Svetlana?
Is that your BMW in front of the building in the NY Times article?
The Kochs are the worst. We must save the country from the Kochs!
So we vote Clinton, like any good, smart, non-racist democrat would
MisdemeanorRebel
2016 Jul 25, 8:36pm
What do your coworkers in St. Pete say, Svetlana?
Is that your BMW in front of the building in the NY Times article?
I've also stopped beating my wife.
MisdemeanorRebel
2016 Jul 25, 8:38pm
Hopefully, the leaky wiki folks are equal opportunity ass fuckers, and will treat us to Donald's tax forms this fall. Well, actually I'm not hoping that our election hinges on what assange feels like leaking and when.
Trump hasn't called Snowden a Traitor, supported Manning's harsh prison sentence for whistleblowing, and is not responsible for Assange's situation holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy.
Nor has Trump flat out lied to a Putin Protege about the real intent of intervening militarily in Libya, right to his face.
marcus
2016 Jul 25, 8:41pm
THe Koch brothers are evil. But they aren't evil enough to support Trump.
Allow me to break this down for you. The fact that the evil Koch brothers may think Hillary would be better for the country than Trump, in terms of risk aversion alone, is not proof that Hillary is worse than Trump.
Put that 150 to work for a minute and see if you can't grok this.
Btw, I know that at one time the Koch brothers said they prefer Hillary. I don't know if that's even still true. Doubtful really, based on her view on climate change versus Trumps, and also Trumps VP choice.
Trump hasn't called Snowden a Traitor, supported Manning's harsh prison sentence for whistleblowing, and is not responsible for Assange's situation holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy.
Stop the effing lie already!
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jul/2/donald-trump-edward-snowden-kill-traitor/
FNWGMOBDVZXDNW
2016 Jul 25, 9:00pm
Trump hasn't called Snowden a Traitor
So, it's a personal vendetta we are being treated to. That's ok, then.
From http://m.democracynow.org/stories/16450
Julian Assange: Choosing Between Trump or Clinton is Like Picking Between Cholera or Gonorrhea
FNWGMOBDVZXDNW
2016 Jul 25, 9:06pm
Stop the effing lie already!
That's nothing Trump can't walk back... Oh, wait... Assange is probably not as stupid and gullible as the average Trump supporter. That might be a problem. Maybe Trump can set up a honeypot trap with a nice young girl, and blackmail as Assange.
Tenpoundbass
2016 Jul 25, 10:17pm
Is that all you got?
Hillary and Bill sold Putin the Uranium and now every body knows it, they are laughing at you behind your back and you don't even know it.
God you are so stupid. ...am I doing it right?
MisdemeanorRebel
2016 Jul 25, 11:33pm
That's nothing Trump can't walk back...
He's dodged sniper fire in Bosnia, supported Gay Marriage his entire political career, is now against TPP. Amirite?
Chamber President Tom Donohue’s statements to Fox Business News on Wednesday morning represented an astonishing break from the organization’s nearly invariable support for Republican candidates.
“Trump talks about some important things in energy and taxes and financial areas,†Donohue said. “Hillary perhaps has more experience and businessmen like that — businessmen and women like that — but I don’t think that’ll be decided until you hear the speeches here and next week and you see the first debate, and I think people will start to move more clearly to where they’re going to vote.â€
Chief among Donohue’s complaints about Trump was his opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
“We need a trade deal that opens markets for us,†Donohue complained. “I like where he says we’ve got to get a little tougher on some of the fulfillment. But you want to stop trade? You want to get rid of NAFTA? NAFTA is 14 million jobs in the United States.â€The Chamber spent tens of millions of dollars backing GOP candidates and attacking President Barack Obama during the 2010 and 2012 election cycles. Although the organization remains supportive of congressional Republicans, it has clashed with Trump over international trade agreements. Trump has said the Chamber should “fight harder†for workers.
Donohue has also suggested that presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton would implement the TPP — a major chamber priority — despite her current position of opposing the agreement.
https://theintercept.com/2016/07/20/chamber-of-commerce-may-prefer-hillary-clinton-to-donald-trump/
But we all know this... it's the main reason she selected Kaine, a TPP Fast Tracker who just days before his announcement as Veep defended it - to reassure her anti-reform, pro-deregulation Wall Street Backers.
MisdemeanorRebel
2016 Jul 25, 11:37pm
Stop the effing lie already!
But don't forget that Hillary claimed Snowden helped terrorists:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/04/hillary-clinton-edward-snowdens-leaks-helped-terrorists/455586/
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/04/hillary-clinton-snowden-nsa-russia-china
Or this whopper:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/oct/14/hillary-clinton/clinton-says-nsa-leaker-snowden-failed-use-whistle/
And the double standard between Hillary and Snowden:
http://observer.com/2016/06/the-classified-double-standard/
MisdemeanorRebel
2016 Jul 25, 11:44pm
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/07/why-some-leftists-defend-trumps-ties-to-russia.html
Yeah, this article is packed with indisputable evidence... mostly guilt by association.
VanDenHuevel made a Tweet, she's a Russia Lover! Manafort worked with the formerly Elected President of Ukraine!
What's really funny is just last week he wrote an article asking whether Trump and Russia were working together
Gee, possibly to indisputable in just one week! Chait figured it all out real quick!
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/07/donald-trump-working-for-russia.html
But what do you expect from a self-admitted liberal hawk?
FNWGMOBDVZXDNW
2016 Jul 26, 6:55am
But we all know this... it's the main reason she selected Kaine, a TPP Fast Tracker who just days before his announcement as Veep defended it - to reassure her anti-reform, pro-deregulation Wall Street Backers.
Is Trump going to wash some of the makeup of, and make a case for what is wrong with the current trade deals and tell us how he would change them? That is, will he have the balls to be specific enough for people to explain how he is wrong?
Adrien Chen, who reported last summer on Russia's army of internet trolls ... noted in December that the trolls he was tracking had begun posing as pro-Trump conservatives.
...
With a normal candidate, the Russia connection would amount to a massive, disqualifying scandal. At minimum, the nominee would face overwhelming pressure to release his tax return - a standard requirement even without grounds for suspicion - to prove he is not getting paid by a hostile foreign power. To be clear, it is pretty improbable that Trump is literally working for Putin. But this hardly settles the question. First, for a risk as consequential as the willful penetration of the American government by a hostile power, "pretty improbable†is not improbable enough. Second, the more likely explanation for the web of ties between Trump and Putin is still fairly damning. You have a candidate with a long record of admiring despots in general and the Russian despot in particular, surrounded by advisers in his pay, and who is flamboyantly ignorant of policy. Given these circumstances, it would be hard to imagine how Trump could form views on Russia without Putin's influence.
But the accusation that Trump's relationship with Russia reeks of impropriety, in the media now by Clinton, has provoked a furious counterattack on the left. Even the indisputable notion that Russia is trying to help Trump (far from the more explosive charge that Trump is trying to help Russia) has been assailed on the left as "McCarthyism†by figures like Katrina vandenHeuvel, Glenn Greenwald, and many others.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/07/why-some-leftists-defend-trumps-ties-to-russia.html