patrick.net

First girl I ever, uh, touched was an Irish-American girl across the street in Chicagoland. I'm still grateful.

Patrick says

First girl I ever, uh, touched was an Irish-American girl across the street in Chicagoland. I'm still grateful.

Playing the straight man for AF again? He must be out doing damage control for Biden.

Patrick says

First girl I ever, uh, touched was an Irish-American girl across the street in Chicagoland. I'm still grateful.

Grateful? To who, those friends who held her down?

Lol, she was more than willing.

In high school, I was invited to Sadie Hawkins dance by an Irish girl who sat behind me. She thought I should be her boyfriend, but she wasn't aware of how utterly pathetic I was. I was terrified and didn't want to go to the dance, but my whole family ganged up on me and made me go.

Patrick says

First girl I ever, uh, touched was an Irish-American girl across the street in Chicagoland. I'm still grateful.

The first girl I ever really banged, Aimee. Her last name was even more Irish. Pale skin, slender brunette, but it was really blonde. Dye it Black, black numbah one nah un un unnnn. That song hadn't come out yet.

I was a serial poker, but that was my first actual sex rather than shoving the head in and pulling it out after hearing parental footsteps or something. We did it to "Fire Woman" by the Cult. Apt, because my Johnson started burning a few days later. Put up with it for weeks. In hindsight, I'm weirdly proud that I put up with the pain so long I passed out several times pissing.

MisdemeanorRebellionNoCoupForYou says

We did it to "Fire Woman" by the Cult

Nice, "Smoke on the Horizon! Fire!"

God, how much I miss classic rock!

Sorry hunter, but some Hispanics, esp. Mexicans, have very Masculine faces I just can't like.

http://38.media.tumblr.com/ffc7febc64764a9595ed76f19570464c/tumblr_naubi4ANeq1qki2c1o1_500.gif

MisdemeanorRebellionNoCoupForYou says

2389

I hope you're not referring to Miss Funbags in post 2389?

Tenpoundbass says

I hope you're not referring to Miss Funbags in post 2389?

Great funbags, but the face is putting me off.

HunterTits says

1, 5, 2, 3, 4, 6.

In the 80's when you had an ounce of good Coke

HunterTits says

Bend 'em over and line 'em up. Hips gonna be tired.

I'd like to have one of those to wet my stamps and envelopes.

Ceffer says

I'd like to have one of those to wet my stamps and envelopes.

Better if the glue was laced with cocaine, roofies and GHB.

HunterTits says

I do not think there has ever been a more perfect set of tits. The only thing that a person "might" be able to quibble with is if they are not their preferred color.

HunterTits says

That picture perked me right up.

The best part of waking up,…

Wow, girl immediately above is amazingly attractive.

Yep, that's from Lifeforce.

Carlson! Come to me Carlson.

He's like "Humanity, or a great pair of tits?"

I don't understand this thread.

It's easy to find nude women on the net.

richwicks says

I don't understand this thread.

It's easy to find nude women on the net.

It is easy to find political comments too, but we are sharing here.

It's curated by HunterTits, who lives up to his name.

Except for the one manly-faced Mexican broad.

HeadSet says

richwicks says

I don't understand this thread.

It's easy to find nude women on the net.

It is easy to find political comments too, but we are sharing here.

Political discussion adds understanding to the world. It's productive.

You may be blissfully unaware of the state of our nation.

We have a president, who wasn't elected, who is senile, who reads teleprompters written by our intelligence agencies, who are funded by our central banking system.

That's our actual situation.

But you go ahead, and look at naked women because.. Well, do it.

We have time to read political discussion along with discussing housing and viewing nudes.

And whether we spend out time on politics or viewing nekkeds, we will still have " president, who wasn't elected, who is senile, who reads teleprompters written by our intelligence agencies, who are funded by our central banking system."

If you want to change that you will have to run for office or get involved at the precinct level as championed by TenPoundBass.

Space Vamp Queen.

Patrick Stewart was in that film. I think she kills him.

BLOOD GARBANZOS!

HunterTits says

richwicks says

But you go ahead, and look at naked women because.. Well, do it.

Fuck you, Mr Pro Baby Kilker.

You don't get to define what is or isn't posted on PatNet.

Haha, no I don't.

And please stop strawmanning me. When I mean "I don't understand", I mean exactly that. I'm not being sly or trying to be clever in words. I literally don't understand the point of this thread.

And I'm not "pro abortion" either. I'm also not "pro choice", or "pro life", or "anti life".

HunterTits says

All kinds of different subjects are posted here.

This one seems to be particularly frivolous.

But all technologies take off with pornography. Even the Gutenberg press did. Few people know that. The Internet certainly did, before it was capable of transmitting images, and then video, it was a weird thing for nerds to use. I was on this system 10 years for that.

I spent some time thinking about this subject. I suspect you are looking for commonality. That's why this thread exists, to find like minds. Now that, I can understand. To me, pornography is something I've been exposed to for 40 years. I can still appreciate a beautiful woman but it's no longer sexualized for me. I've thought myself out of a lot pleasures probably to my own detriment.

HunterTits says

richwicks says

I literally don't understand the point of this thread.

Doesn't stop you from spamming it with your off-topic nonsense, tho.

As you said, "You don't get to define what is or isn't posted on PatNet."

I'm just surprised on your position on abortion. It breaks the model in my mind. I assumed you are pretty religious to absolutely oppose abortion from the moment of conception, but at the same time seemingly obsessed with nude pictures of women, that makes me assume that you are not religious.

I have a broken model. I'm wrong in one way or another. Love of porn = not religious, hatred of abortion of any kind = religious. I have to be wrong in at least one way.

When I say I don't understand, I really mean it. You're under no obligation to help me understand that but I'd be curious if you would. I am certainly wrong in at least one way. I really am obsessive about comprehension. I also am aware perhaps you are experiencing cognitive dissonance yourself.

A complete repudiation of abortion and a love of pornography may be a conflict you might now see. I cannot resolve it. I habitually resolve my cognitive dissonance now. I'm very well aware of being wrong.

HunterTits says

richwicks says

A complete repudiation of abortion and a love of pornography may be a conflict you might now see.

Your problem is that you don't seem to know what a dictionary is and/or how to use it.

Appreciating nude women is not 'pornography'.

And pornography and abortion have nothing to do with each other anyway.

I view pornography as sexual satisfaction without consequence. That's how I view abortion, at least at early termination. I'm horrifically aware of any woman that I have sex with can lead to a pregnancy.

HunterTits says

Appreciating nude women is not 'pornography'.

And pornography and abortion have nothing to do with each other anyway.

I don't see a purpose of enjoying pornography without masturbation to be entirely clear. I view meaningless sex to be incongruent to be in opposition to abortion.

HunterTits says

richwicks says

I also am aware perhaps you are experiencing cognitive dissonance yourself.

What? Because I know how to use a dictionary?

And no. I am not particularly religious. I just don't make excuses for murder.

I've had to check my spelling on words 2 times with this shitty web-browser. I don't give a shit what a dictionary says.

I simply don't understand why you consider it murder before the developing child has developed a brain or even a nervous system.

Sure, I would like to entirely eliminate the possibility of abortion. Who wouldn't? People who sell fetal tissue and who sell babies I would guess, obviously gruesome people. I am NOT on their side. But I do not want to see a 14 year old girl be forced to bring a pregnancy to term provided she does it early enough, and I do not regard this as murder. I regard as murder if she terminates it from 24 weeks and beyond. Maybe 12 weeks and beyond. I do not wish to harm.

Again, having a woman terminate a pregnancy at 9 months is not the same as 1 month. You must realize that at some level. Where the cutoff is, that's not clear but I believe you are drawing the line too close at conception. I don't support murder, I don't want to cause pain or suffering, but I cannot see that as happening with 1 month old pregnancy.

If it makes any difference to you, I'm not an advocate in this area. I will not try to change minds. I am only curious as to what people think. I am an engineer, I want to solve problems, and I'm incapable of even identifying this problem at this point. This is why I'm asking for input. If you can understand the other side of the debate, and they can understand your side, I think there is a resolution. I understand neither side. This is mechanical to me. No brain == not human yet, at the very lest, no consciousness == not human yet the very most. My first memory was at 3 years old, but I'm not certain I was human before then - still, I will always absolutely oppose infanticide.

Not pointing any fingers, it's a long time issue involving many people.

Please don't post comments unless they a VERY GOOD AND RELATED TO TNA in a positive manner.

Mostly this thread works without comment and @HunterTits has done a bang up and down managing it that way.

There are alt threads for critique.

At least the comments aren't pictures of fat hairy gay men. That used to be a problem.

HunterTits says

richwicks says

I don't give a shit what a dictionary says.... I'm horrifically aware of any woman that I have sex with can lead to a pregnancy.

Yes. You do that a lot. You make up your own definitions and then you don't even apply them with any logical consistency. I've noticed that in other topics.

How so? Can you point to an example. It's possible you're correct, but I'm honestly unaware of it.

HunterTits says

I just point out how fucked up that is. And I certainly do not take what you have to say seriously when you do that. (You don't always do that, btw)

Please explain by first pointing out an example and explaining how I'm misusing a definition.

It's always been a frustration of mine actually. Just as I may see the color green in a different way than you experience, I may view a word in a similar way. I think with a definition of a word, I can actually understand. We all build up an hierarchy of comprehension, but unlike most people, I'm willing to make a few hierarchies.

HunterTits says

richwicks says

I am an engineer

You must not be a good one since 1 + 1 doesn't always equals 2 for you.

Sure it does. You are not being specific though, so I'm unable to see your viewpoint. There are claims that it's never been "proved" that 1+1=2, I think it's a stupid waste of time to make a proof of something that is an axiom that has been more or less proved through repeated example.

HunterTits says

richwicks says

I simply don't understand why you consider it murder before the developing child has developed a brain or even a nervous system.

That's because what you consider doesn't match what is defined in a dictionary.

Life is life. A human zygote is life. Period.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/human

Do you see how the definition depends on itself to define itself? It's not entirely clear.

I think humanity relates to our self awareness but an animal has self awareness. I know this from experience. They certainly have self awareness so what distinguishes us? It seems to be the capacity for abstract thought. An early term baby doesn't have that, I didn't until at least 3 years old.

For a LONG TIME I was vegetarian. I may return to that. Didn't want to be part of ending a life, it seemed cruel and senseless and selfish to me, but even if you don't eat meat, somebody else will end the life for you - refusing to eat meat doesn't change anything. I don't regard abortion as something that should be taken lightly but I'm not absolutely opposed to it. Abortion can ALSO be cruel, senseless, and selfish as well. Particularly in late term. I told you, I do not support abortion, but I also do not oppose it. I absolutely oppose late term abortion, but I do not oppose early term, but what is early versus late? I can't define that, I admit my ignorance.

I've also been an absolute atheist before but there's still quite a bit of wonder and beauty in existence. I've kind of lost my faith though in believing we're all meat machines, that everything living is. Every faith I have had, I lose in time. Existence is perhaps an impossible thing to define, although I know it, but I don't understand nonexistence although I must have experienced it. Who was I in 1950?

HunterTits says

I give up.

It's my failure, not yours.

It is extremely difficult to bridge comprehension. I'm not trying to be difficult, I do my best to show you where I am. It's neither above or below, it's a gulf of comprehension. In terms of math, it's a local maxima.

I do not oppose your viewpoint, again, I simply don't entirely understand it. I understand your opposition to ending a life though, however all life ends. It's difficult to understand where existence begins at least for me. My belief is you believe life beings at conception. This is alien to me.

I was a vegetarian for 1/2 my life because I opposed the termination of life, but all life ends. You may see this as irrelevant, but I was very opposed to ending a life at one point, but I realize I cannot stop it.

I will not oppose your opinion.

I can’t find porn anywhere except here. Vons doesn’t carry Playboy anymore. Thanks guys.