by null follow (0)
« First « Previous Comments 22 - 36 of 36 Search these comments
When it comes to radical fundamentalist islam, we are not talking about a "religion" in the western sense of the word. Radical islam is not a religion. It is a totalitarian fascist political movement. We should have no problem denouncing a totalitarian fascist political movement and keep people who support and working toward such an end out of our country.
We attack this horrible cult all the time. Unfortunately, some naive people on Patnet go to great lengths to defend it.
Radical islam is not a religion and we should stop calling it one.
It's a rabid animal that should be shot.
We should have no problem denouncing a totalitarian fascist political movement and keep people who support and working toward such an end out of our country.
The evidence would indicate otherwise:


Lee Kuan Yew, the late leader of Singapore wrote in his book Hard Truths to Keep Singapore Going, that Muslim integration in Singapore is failing.
Islam is much too violent for any other group to survive in it's midst. The wisest option is to control it's spread. But how?
Why would anyone want to integrate large groups that believe in fiction/lies?
Well we do have the Republican Party!
Why would anyone want to integrate large groups that believe in fiction/lies?
So that we can live side by side in peace. That's what freedom loving people want, that's what all humans deserve.
I believe that Muslims would agree that this is true: Islam doesn't play nice with other religions.
Yes, a Pakistani friend at work once told me that the Saudis regard all non-Arabs as not quite human, and legitimate targets of exploitation, Muslim or not.
Where my uncle lived in Saudi, Dammam and Jubail, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis are the ones working as slave labor in fields where natural gas extraction takes place.
As you know, he referred to them as animals and never brought his wife and children to live with him there. He came to the US as soon as he could after my dad sponsored his brother-in-law
I believe that Muslims would agree that this is true: Islam doesn't play nice with other religions.
Actually Muslims believe that they are super-tolerant of other religions, because the Koran allows certain limited non-Muslims (only Jews and Christians) the right to pay a ransom every year to save their lives. Others like Hindus are required to convert or die, but "people of the book" get that extra option to pay to keep their own religion and still live!
Seriously, Muslims think that's being tolerant, and complain when Islam is called "intolerant".
Of course absolutely zero other religion is allowed in Saudi Arabia at all. No churches, no synagogues, no bibles allowed in the country. There are limits to their immense tolerance you know.
Earlier this week, the Singapore government said that it would not allow two foreign Islamic preachers to enter Singapore as part of a religious-themed cruise set to take place in late November. The move is just the latest in a series of steps that Singapore is taking to crack down on radical ideology, and it also exposes both the city-state’s growing alarm at the terrorism threat as well as the lingering challenges states face in addressing it.
Why can't we use common sense like Singapore?
Political correctness destroyed any common sense we may have had...
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has noted on several occasions in the past year that Singapore operates on the expectation of “when” rather than “if” a terror attack will occur.
Sure other religions are less evil than Islam, but the lesser of two evils is still an evil and there is no up side to tolerating any religion.
« First « Previous Comments 22 - 36 of 36 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,363,825 comments by 15,739 users - AD, Patrick, The_Deplorable online now