patrick.net

thunderlips11 is deplorable says

Elizabeth Warren is setting up for a future run.

If Trump wins, Warren might run in 2020. If Hillary wins, Warren will never run. 2024 is just too late for her to start a presidential first term. She's almost the same age as Clinton. 2020 is the last plausible time for Warren to run as president.

It's a shame that a dismal excuse for a woman is preventing a great woman from becoming the first woman president.

Supporters of The corrupt Citizens United SCOTUS decision are now Hillary supporters, since she's the biggest abuser of huge campaign money donations now!

Maybe she is having so much trouble releasing the transcripts from her secretive little meetings with 1%er bankers, because she doesn't know how to put letters and words, to sounds.

Either she spent the entire hour getting throated by the banksters that gave her all those millions in exchange for political favors, or

She never actually gave any speeches. They just give her money, in exchange for political favors. And she just lied about giving speeches

You know errc, anyone who is for Bernie Sanders would be for a candidate that:

1. believes in global warming
2. isn't for killing the department of education
3. Isn't against the EPA.
4. didn't just say his next EPA guy would be a global warming denier.
5. Has a tax policy, that supports the middle class, not more tax cuts for the rich.
6. believes in strengthening our relationships with allies, not giving support to dictators.
7. isn't a racist.

you aren't a bernie supporter; you are just a dumbfuck.

If the race was between Trump and Elizabeth Warren, Trump would stand no chance. Thanks Hillary.

Hillary is hated. That's why Trump stands a good chance. Trump is hated. That's why Hillary stands a good chance. Elizabeth Warren is only hated by bankers and loved by everyone else. But hey, having Hillary president is so damn important because we need a first woman president right now and Elizabeth Warren evidently is a man. Plus Hillary clearly represents women because she slut-shamed a 12-year-old girl for being raped so badly that she could no longer have children. Doesn't that make feminists proud?

then, if we had a brick for every lie trump tells, we could just pave up the whole fucking country.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/25/media/newspapers-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-lies/index.html

all trump supporters are just too fucking stupid to accept facts. sad.

What I want to know is what the fuck is so great about being an oligarch if you have to have Hillary sucking your cock. You would think they could get something better. That's kind of like eating lion testicles just because it is expensive.

You are a real miserable, simple simon motherfucker. I'm not a Trump supporter. I am a Bernie voter. It's a shame that Hillary is such a terrible candidate, but that's reality.

if you can hold your nose, and vote Clinton, good for you. I cannot

errc says

I'm not a Trump supporter. I am a Bernie voter. I

Bernie himself would bitch slap a stupid little millennial pussy like you.

truth will find you says

Bernie himself would bitch slap a stupid little millennial pussy like you.

Very true. Berni is probably ashamed to have voters such as errc, that don't understand that their vote matters and they should use it as such and encourage others to use their vote wisely too.

I guess errc wouldn't be the first person that had a a high IQ (as he claims) but also an ego that made them an idiot.

Yes, the Dems have a (too) effective massive marketing machine.

-Now the free tuition.
-Next week the social media.
-Then the free advertizing of media (even the debate moderator, in some instances)
-Next week abortion rights again

So dems ignore the reality of loss of Jobs, service industry jobs, inner cities worsening, and sound investment?

It just handing out favors and sound bytes to win, but the force majure is towards a new type of socialism?

The US Army is in on it!
http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/davidbadash/us_army_tweets_ncrm_story_on_trump_s_lies
Teeeheee. Oh, you young army personnel with control of our new-fangled-confuser-interweb machines. Has to be done though, because cyber.

Not sure if tweets come across well on Patnet but here goes ...

https://twitter.com/petridishes/status/780483100442787840?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

https://twitter.com/sadydoyle/status/780574147067994113?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

https://twitter.com/inkedtater/status/780584575160365056?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

https://twitter.com/jerryspringer/status/780601736327208960?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Edit: aww, boo, they don't.

Just the debate ...
www.youtube.com/embed/EHclppeLdi0

Rew says

Just the debate ..

Hillary may very well lose because her entire campaign is "vote for me or else" and that's not very persuasive.

thunderlips11 is deplorable says

The point was to talk about their upbringing. We're constantly reminded of Trump's dad being wealthy, but not Hillary's.

But hillary isn't 24/7 telling us she is a brilliant money grubber and she should be elected president because of it. We are constantly reminded of trumps wealth because he throws it into our face all day every day. That's trump's whole schtick. I made a lot of money, I'm a brilliant businessman, I should be president. It's his only claim to the presidency, A claim he has provided no proof whatsoever of other than I say so.

So yes, it should be questioned constantly until he backs it up. Wasn't he the one that complained about people not providing proof of their claims, like say a birth certificate? Someone running for president should not run on a platform of do as I say not as I do.

No she isn't.
Wikileaks is...

bob2356 says

But hillary isn't 24/7 telling us she is a brilliant money grubber

Sure, forget about the Right who believe we should legislate every private act we commit in our own homes, because no one can be trusted to make their own decisions. And if that's not enough, the Right believe we need to interfere in people's lives in other countries, because if citizens can't be trusted to manage their personal affairs, foreigners certainly can't either. Forget that they're in their OWN country when the Right advocates this intervention.

marcus says

don't understand that their vote matters

Speaking of simple Simons.....voting usually DOESNT matter. This has been demonstrated by so many academics and even in this site with numerous links and citations and you still say voting matters....amazing how brainwashed people are.

Voting for democrat candidate at national level from California: utterly pointless

Voting for democrat/republican in a swing state: may have some value

No, I think that you think voting matters because by extension, you are saying that YOU matter. Well you probably do not, unless you are a paid shill