patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,361,685 comments by 15,750 users - Misc, Tenpoundbass, zzyzzx online now
Comments 1 - 10 of 10 Search these comments
Tenpoundbass
2016 Oct 4, 5:54am
You said you were bullied by the Establishment State Department, but then you say you want them to bully Trump.
Then you call Trump the bully.
Y
2016 Oct 4, 6:02am
Roberta Alt-Acct...
ohomen171 says
Way back in 1981 I made some low-level bureaucrats at the US State Department got mad at me
FNWGMOBDVZXDNW
2016 Oct 4, 6:40am
The reason he is not releasing his taxes is probably because they contain proof of fraud when combined with other public info. Maybe he hid future tax liabilities from investors for example.
Tenpoundbass
2016 Oct 4, 6:49am
He's not releasing his tax to show what feckless snot whistles the establishment is.
People will eventually see. He's setting up his birth er moment for the morons.
Rew
2016 Oct 4, 7:09am
For the establishment to attack the anti-establishment figure head of the moment, one who will get 40% of the popular vote, would be a destructive move. The establishment would only find more ire from deplorables and those who believe the system is broken beyond repair.
Trying Trump would need to be done in a very tactful way, and it would need to avoid even a whisper of anything politically motivated.
So far, nothing strong enough to destroy him on has come to light.
FNWGMOBDVZXDNW
2016 Oct 4, 8:36am
duende
duende duende duende. Nope. I still don't get the appeal. You do seem amused with your new toy, though. Maybe I'll try again later.
Op is a dem lackey, like yourself. He posted a thread right after the debate, about how it was Hilldogs "duende moment ". I can't stop laughing
You said you were bullied by the Establishment State Department, but then you say you want them to bully Trump.
Then you call Trump the bully.
What goes around,comes around.
Way back in 1981 I made some low-level bureaucrats at the US State Department got mad at me, What followed was 19 years of hell including numerous court cases and incarcerations. I learned form that very negative experience one thing. You do not want to be the person that some bureaucrat decides "to make an example of."
What is disturbing about "being made an example of" is that it is applied in a very arbitrary manner. Ten people can do the same thing. Nine of the ten people will be punished lightly or not at all. The tenth person will receive severe punishment. In many cases the government employees administering the punishment will not understand why one particular person was chosen for the severe punishment.
The whole idea behind this strategy is to frighten many other people tempted to break the rules into compliance.
Donald Trump's own words are going to make some bureaucrats at the IRS, SEC, etc.mad and come to the conclusion that he must be made an example of to frighten other people and companies from doing similar things. All of his money, political connections, bullying, etc will not protect him from a serious Federal criminal investigation and indictment. The trial or trials that follow will be very expensive and protracted. He will have a 99% chance of being found guilty. Once found guilty he will go to Federal prison.