« First « Previous Comments 6 - 44 of 44 Search these comments
My wife is a college professor. Most of them secretly pray for a Trump
Even the female faculty? Because there are affirmative polices which favor women. Especially in science departments of research institutions. I'm seeeing (and have suffered) this firsthand.
Those of You with Wives in Workplace Will See More Abuse on Them If Trump Wins
Oh sure, IF you consider pussy grabbing abuse, that is.
Important Reasons not to vote for Hillary:



And less frivolous:

Hey Gary, you realize your candidate is about as Neocon as possible? She's probably a step to the right of Lindsay Graham.



Gary you are wrong. Firstly I don't think he'll win. But if he does economy will boom.
FortWayne - Trump's going to win.
This is going to be American Brexit in Steroids, and many will be literally shocked on the 9th.
He's not only going to win, but it is going to be a wave-tsunami election, and he'll win states like Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, etc.
Feminism is what has caused the situation that makes women have to work most of the time wither they want to or not now.
My s/o is a labor/employment attorney who will vote for Hillary, and even she said that your claim has no rational basis.
Children are already behaving poorly in schools when it comes to disabled children. Trump has brought widespread evil into the empire.
This is going to be American Brexit in Steroids
Brexit was about keeping the pound. Yes there was some immigrant backlash but it isn't to the level of Trump. And we have the dollar, so we don't need to Brexit.
Gary you are wrong. Firstly I don't think he'll win. But if he does economy will boom.
Can't boom. Historical monetary theory is dead: http://www.talkmarkets.com/content/bonds/economic-theory-is-dead-new-normal-means-no-recovery?post=108622&uid=4798
Trump is too far outside the norm to influence any lasting change in the country whatsoever.
That is what they thought about Hitler.
Trump is too far outside the norm to influence any lasting change in the country whatsoever.
That is what they thought about Hitler.
That's what they think about black holes too. Are you suggesting that every black hole in the universe is a Hitler?
That's what they think about black holes too. Are you suggesting that every black hole in the universe is a Hitler?
You only need a self avowed racist with hatred and people who buy into that Hatred to create a Hitler. Trump is a proven self avowed Aryan racist. But you all love him because you are all racist too. Or perhaps you don't think taking a chance on a potential Hitler is simply without risk. In that case you are deplorable for lack of smarts.
Ahh, the "Hitler Card" (or canard, to be more precise).
What took so long?
Trump = Hitler is sophomoric, at best, and incredible, disingenuous fear-mongering, most likely.
Gary, you're a tool.
What say you about Hillary & the globalised?
What say you about Hillary's close ties to war-mongerers extraordinaire Robert Kagan & his wife, Victoria Nuland, who LITERALLY ARE TRYING TO START A WAR WITH RUSSIA (and have been for 5 years now)?
But you all love him because you are all racist too. Or perhaps you don't think taking a chance on a potential Hitler is simply without risk. In that case you are deplorable for lack of smarts.
Hey, I only admit to love black holes. Does this make me a deplorable racist?
He will cut taxes, that will grow investment and hence everything.
Gary you are wrong. Firstly I don't think he'll win. But if he does economy will boom.
Can't boom. Historical monetary theory is dead: http://www.talkmarkets.com/content/bonds/economic-theory-is-dead-new-normal-means-no-recovery?post=108622&uid=4798
Those numbers show even less democrats voting, than in 2012. Which if you recall, was full of excuses why ten million less voted for Dems vs the previous presidential election
That trend can't be good for the democrats.
ratio: noun
Nevermind
Merely an observation. Numbers don't fool nor confuse me. However, i am going on no sleep, so my brain is a little Trumpy at the moment.
Those numbers show even less democrats voting, than in 2012.
Here's a more nuanced view. Part of the issue is that there are less early voting places
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/north-carolina-early-vote-tracker.html?_r=0
Two things have changed, albeit slightly. First, our estimate for the final turnout has gradually declined. That’s because early voting has been a little slower this year than in 2012. Part of the reason is that there are some North Carolina counties where the number of in-person early voting stations has been scaled back. This has clearly reduced the number of early voters. We have made no adjustment for this effect, which should gradually diminish once more polling stations open on Oct. 27.
One interesting thing is that the millenial vote (in NC and elsewhere) is breaking for Hillary. Not a shocker, but it did take a while.
However, i am going on no sleep, so my brain is a little Trumpy at the moment.
Been up all night Tweeting? It's Trump's excuse for being incoherent, you leave it alone.
Why the fuck I still see Gary fucking Andersen whom I've put on ignore five times already?
However, i am going on no sleep, so my brain is a little Trumpy at the moment.
Been up all night Tweeting? It's Trump's excuse for being incoherent, you leave it alone.
Working.
Trump should try sleeping sometimes. I know i need a nap
Why the fuck I still see Gary fucking Andersen whom I've put on ignore five times already?
@"Straw Man" Sorry about that. He re-registered, so you have to ignore him again.
And yes, the instant comments (that appear without page reloads) have no ignore functionality yet. Will work on that tonight.
Patrick, I'm really not kissing ass here, but in addition to running one of the few "true free speech" forums on the interwebz (which is going to pay off as a smart move in more ways than one), you have the patience of Job, the wisdom of Solomon, and are as fair, diplomatic, polite & neutral a site-owner as I've ever seen.
I highly doubt I could rise to those lofty levels of manners as a site-participant, let alone owner, as you have done so.
The married,working republican, slut women won't mind a little pussy grabbing.
Why the fuck I still see Gary fucking Andersen whom I've put on ignore five times already?
I am not here for you. So ignore, I don't care. But there are people who likely are torn as to racism, and bigotry and I support tolerance. As long as Trumplorables are not violent, I tolerate them and their free speech as well.
And, I reject Zionism which is a political cabal and not Judaism, and hope Clinton is more pragmatic than the more rabid Zionists are. Even Alex Jones has ruined the 9/11 conspiracy movement because of his racist articles and hatred of Muslim articles. It is amazing that Jones can support Trump, when his own research shows the Republicans did 9/11. I think he is a hostage.Or just stupid.
Why stop at wives? Think of your mother, and daughter, and granddaughter. Do these womens also not have pussys to grab? If the Donald encourages people to refer to Ivanka as a piece of ass, shouldn't we match his generosity and offer up all of our women for the pussy grab-a-thon at work?
Think not about what your office can do for your wife's pussy. Think about what your wife's pussy can do for your office.
Isn't that the truth, and since Trump says his limit for dating girls is 12 years old, you have to worry about your daughters too.
Why the fuck I still see Gary fucking Andersen whom I've put on ignore five times already?
@"Straw Man" Sorry about that. He re-registered, so you have to ignore him again.
No worries, it was a rhetorical question. ;)
Hillary : "I will STOP the PUSSY grabbing! We NEED to import more Middle Eastern IMMIGRANTS than the ones BARAK OBAMA already has. YOU saw how nicely they BEHAVED in Rotherham, Calais and Cologne."
(Caps indicate her angry librarian speaking style).
What if he speaks only in consonants...is he absolved?
You only need a self avowed racist with hatred and people who buy into that Hatred to create a Hitler.
No worries, it was a rhetorical question. ;)
I have new material. :)
You'll have to re-register again for me to see it.
I liked Sylvester. I don't like Donald. He has promised his followers virgins from his new TV, the Lolita Channel, soon to be near you.
So same logic, if Hillary wins, women will let their husband cheat around. ?
Will cigar sales go up, Men will hit on fat ugly women, drycleaners will make lot of money cleaning up white stain on dresses?
You guys will see more abuse on your wives if Trump wins. Men will want to be like him if he wins the presidency.
yeah, I imagine lots of men will be worried that their obese wives may be sexually abused in the workplace. BTW, were you inspired to wear mom jeans like obama?
So same logic, if Hillary wins, women will let their husband cheat around. ?
Bill isn't running.
« First « Previous Comments 6 - 44 of 44 Search these comments
You guys will see more abuse on your wives if Trump wins. Men will want to be like him if he wins the presidency.
And here are 10 reasons why he should not win:
http://www.examplesofglobalization.com/2016/10/top-ten-reasons-why-trump-cannot-be.html
#politics