patrick.net

By late afternoon, Women's March organizers had issued an official statement, noting that "the anti-choice organization in question" was no longer an official partner and that they were only "marching on behalf of individuals who share the view that women deserve the right to make their own reproductive decisions."

That's right: anything less than complete agreement about abortion and the group doesn't even want you participating in the rally. Nevermind if you're with the group on any or all of its myriad other principles—identify as pro-choice (but against sex-worker rights) or the cool girls don't want to sit with you.

Note also that they are opposed to men's choice. The man should pay for any child, but has zero say in whether or not an abortion should take place. Only responsibilities for men, no rights.

Why don't they just call it the SJW march and really clear things up for anyone who might be interested to attend? Also this would clear up their motivations so the grand majority of Americans would understand they deserve scorn.

rando says

The man should pay for any child, but has zero say in whether or not an abortion should take place.

Well, Patrick, life is not fair. The pay after the child is born is for the child. The abortion before the child is born involves a medical intervention on the mother's body, so she must have a final say about it. Unfair to men, but sometimes you just have to suck it up. Think about it this way - would you rather be a woman?

FP says

life is not fair

That sounds like "I don't give a fuck about men or their rights".

A better solution would be for a woman's choice about her body to have an equal and opposite men's choice about how to spend their support money.

A man should have the choice to refuse to pay all child support if he did not explicitly ask for and want the woman to have the child.

Are you opposed to giving men such equal rights? Why?

Patrick, imho, child support is not about fairness to the man or the woman, it is about taking care of a child.

"the anti-choice organization in question" . Orwell would roll in his grave, but, then the march organizers do not consider the thoughts of a white male valid. 'Inclusivity' means including all my beliefs and excluding any that differ.

https://reason.com/blog/2017/01/17/womens-march-strikes-sex-worker-rights

Nope, you cannot be anti-choice and feminist. Forcing birth on unwilling women is a misogynist act.

So Susan B. Anthony and all the other suffragists were misogynists? What a stupid statement. This is the entire problem with the use of the word feminist today. It means nothing because any asswipe can self-identify as a feminist and then can call anyone else, even the leaders of the real feminist movements of the early 1900s, misogynists and anti-feminist. The word itself is just poison today.

If Patnetters' parents cared about the planet,they would have ABORTED their ASSHOLE offspring.

Here come the Problem Glasses!

They'll just all go the wrong direction and wind up in a field somewhere.

1. When you know much more than others what is right, you know that other people are not tolerant.
2. When people who are not tolerant also have differing opinions that dont agree with MSNBC, these are bigots.
3.These bigots are the suppressors of human rights, and amplifier of hate. This is discussed daily on CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS.
4. Since they are bigots, hateful, and out of touch with human rights, they cannot be tolerated. Not coincidently some of these people also read Bloomberg and watch Fox News. This proves their bigotry.
5. Since they cannot be tolerated, you can disparage them, and you should speak out against them, and never let them forget ever that they are intolerant, bigots, suppressors of human rights, and amplifiers of hate.

T L Lipsovich says

Problem Glasses!

What are Problem Glasses? I call them them fake-IQ-glasses (*) personally. Is Problem Glasses a meme?

(*) Or IQ-boosters

justme says

What are Problem Glasses? I call them them fake-IQ-glasses (*) personally. Is Problem Glasses a meme?

Because the people who wear them say "Problematic"? I dunno.

Fake-IQ-glasses is a good one!

I was at the gym, and a billowing IHL complete with secretary, FakeIQ, whatever glasses and streaked hair sat in the reclining cycle machine in front of my jogging machine.

All of the fat and cellulite wobbled with mesmerizing tidal fury. I think it dislocated my neck with gravity waves. Can I sue her?

Ceffer says

All of the fat and cellulite wobbled with mesmerizing tidal fury. I think it dislocated my neck with gravity waves. Can I sue her?

If it was Planet Fitness and she was eating some rice cakes while cycling, after grabbing a Pizza Bagel from the front desk, yes.

Ceffer says

I think it dislocated my neck with gravity waves.

Okay, that was funny.

FP says

Patrick, imho, child support is not about fairness to the man or the woman, it is about taking care of a child.

I didn't know you had experimental surgery to have your balls removed.

just any guy says

I didn't know you had experimental surgery to have your balls removed.

How can you know anything without a brain

FP says

just any guy says

I didn't know you had experimental surgery to have your balls removed.

How can you know anything without a brain

Zing! It's ok man, it takes balls to have them removed.

For men, It's Fucksation without Representation.

T L Lipsovich says

Because the people who wear them say "Problematic"

and have no sense of humor.