patrick.net

So true. And note that while hypergamy is brutal in China womyn are fairly ugly and bohemian. They are so rare they don't need to try harder at all.

Whether Rachel Madcow is either young or a woman is debatable. I think I detected some jersey itching and man spreading there for the short periods of time I could stomach watching.

zzyzzx says

This is 100% real btw

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Feminist+Majority+Foundation/@34.0583424,-118.3981131,51m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x80c2bbe365f5602d:0xde8bc4075e2941aa!8m2!3d34.0584198!4d-118.3980065

Car scissoring. Just what you'd expect from a bunch of rabid lesbos.

Well, to be fair, women do regard low status men as barely human slaves, beasts of burden, and shields against danger. It's also easy to stampede them in the directions of other men in idiotic hero rituals.

The good news there is that there is presumably some real financial punishment for shitting their ideology down our throats.

Just like bad money chases out good money so shall the bad people chase out the good. How? The least responsible of humans are the ones having all the babies.

Idiocracy is a thing.


original link
/

GlocknLoad says

Just like bad money chases out good money so shall the bad people chase out the good. How? The least responsible of humans are the ones having all the babies.

Idiocracy is a thing.

Based people have kids. The frugal, hardworking kind who produce the geniuses. The Microwave was invented by some dude from a tiny Maine town of militant Calvinists, I think the population was 500 and now is 300.

Isn't it WONDERFUL that Unitarians, Atheists, Reform Secular Jews, etc. have so few kids? In 20 years there won't be enough wokey teachers and admins to replace the current ones, they'll have to hire based people. And real estate prices will collapse.

What the hell do you mean "are going to"....its already happend, it's precisely why we have communism knocking on the front door, negative births rate and the death of the west.

The only thing that will save the West is we all simultaneously covert to Islam, bitch slap all these feminist bitches back to the kitchen, put them under burqas, take away their right to vote,impregnate them and lock them down so they can't get abortions. Once we doubled the population, pull a "psych", revert back to christianity and live happily ever after. But never give women the right to vote again.

I have to agree.

Basically, the world is ending because women got the right to vote. Sorry, but it's true.

Women are too emotional and have the wrong personality to vote. Women are nurturers so they want to take care of everyone and make everything OK, this leads to socialism and eventually communism. Not to mention most women cant balance a checkbook to save their life, so all voting based on economics goes out the window.

Dholliday126 says

Women are to emotional and have the wrong personality to vote. Women are nurturers so they want to take care of everyone and make everything OK, this leads to socialism and eventually communism. Not to mention most women cant balance a checkbook to save their life, so all voting based on economics goes out the window.

Esp. the last sentence and esp. American womyn - womyn now have the advantage in colleges/universities, more graduates, equal if not better job opportunities, and yet, most American womyn are broke (or worse in debt) at any stage in their life despite their large salaries due to excessive consumerism while you can find many men at the same age and stage in their lives who already have saved 10s if not 100s of thousands. In other cultures women run a very tight ship with their finances as it's a plus when being considering for marriage.

My wife is cheap. I always liked that about her.

The argument about women is statistically correct, because daughters in a prosperous society are by and large raised by spoiling parents. A lot of men too are gullible short time-preference "useful idiots" . . . because they too were raised by spoiling parents who failed to make kids understand the consequences of their actions.

Voting worked well when there was property requirement and there was little to no (subsidized) mortgage available, so price for homes were reasonable and people had to save up to buy their homes (i.e. having at least several years to a decade or longer experience of saving up enough to buy their homes, therefore proving long time-preference, and having a somewhat objective understanding of the consequences of their own actions).

Wait - does anyone think that Indoeuropean and African countries will just stop reproducing? Gimme a break.

Patrick says

Basically, the world is ending because women got the right to vote. Sorry, but it's true.

Dholliday126 says

Women are too emotional and have the wrong personality to vote. Women are nurturers so they want to take care of everyone and make everything OK, this leads to socialism and eventually communism. Not to mention most women cant balance a checkbook to save their life, so all voting based on economics goes out the window.

Women are RESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS. This is even more true in the modern world vs. 100 years ago where a woman worked 12 hours a day to maintain a household of 4-6 people.

It also explains why Mothers of multiple children and married vote very differently than single mothers and single women who want resources distributed to them from Gov't Sugar Daddy. Most married women with children recognize the money is being distributed AWAY from them.

ThreeBays says

How is this bad again? The only areas with an average birthrate still over 2.1 are the poorest African & South Asian countries.

That's like saying fire trucks are bad because where they show up there is a fire.

The prosperous American cities have much higher population density than the poorest African and South Asian country side. Even in those "over-populated" countries, the cities with higher density have much higher population density than the less populated country side. The source of poverty in those poor African and South Asian countries is their society being run by over-educated bureaucrats manipulating their economies through government coercion, so the resulting economy lacks opportunity and vitality.

The declining birth rate in developed countries is likewise the result of rent-seeking by the monopolistic bureaucratic class whose brains are filled with sh*t and all too eager to run other people's lives. If there is any "over-population," it's the over-population of like-minded (therefore redundant) bureaucrats.

Patrick says

Ehrlich infamously predicted that millions would soon starve to death

Ehrlich was largely right.
Except he didn't anticipate the "Green Revolution", which took off about when his book came out, implementing petro-chemical fertilizers to dramatically increase yields, and coinciding with Secretary of Agriculture Earl Butz's directing American farmers to “plant fence row to fence row”.
The result; food bereft of micronutrients grown in depleted soils which along with a massive shift to subsidized corn, released the scourge of endless tanker cars of high fructose syrup and lead to, instead of starvation, the high calorie malnutrition and diabesity epidemic of today.
Oh yeah McGoverns unscientific perversion of the “Food Pyramid” didn’t help either I reckon.
A least the is how I remember it. And I watched as America got fat as fuck.

Two paths to early death and I couldn’t say which was more miserable.

Robert Sproul says

Except he didn't anticipate the "Green Revolution", which took off about when his book came out, implementing petro-chemical fertilizers to dramatically increase yields, and coinciding with Secretary of Agriculture Earl Butz's directing American farmers to “plant fence row to fence row”.

He should have. Agriculture has been increasing yields firmly and steadily for the two centuries prior to his book

He was also on the "Coming Ice Age" thing until the early 80s. From the 60s to late 70s he was on the "dry, cold wave reducing growing seasons and causing water crisis" bandwagon.

Robert Sproul says

Patrick says

Ehrlich infamously predicted that millions would soon starve to death

Ehrlich was largely right.

No he wasn't!

Life is simply a large chaotic existence. Ehrlich's predictions were garbage and didn't come to pass. He was wrong. Name one prediction he was correct in, and quote him.

Just another shyster in my opinion. I once listened to this charlatan, but unlike most people I readily accept when I was tricked and fooled. These people aren't sages, they don't have foresight, they are just propagandists.

It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled - not for me. I recognize my frailty. We've all been fooled and tricked, grow a pair and see it.

All around me are people who refuse to see it, they will recognize it when they are 80. I live among intellectual children who trust authorities over their own lying eyes and direct observation.

richwicks says

Name one prediction he was correct in, and quote him.

"There are to many fucking people" Paul Ehrlick

Now, the government of Paris smells like a fish market all the time instead of just half the time.

ew

To institute quotas by sex is sexist.

I wonder what part of that they don't understand.

Booger says

that's funny.

Booger says

And what's the name of Star Trek's feminist antihero? ... Michael Burnham, not even Michelle Burnham.