patrick.net

bob2356 says

You being a hypocrite is a fact not a reflection on anyone but you.

A hypocrisy involves a contradiction. Name one time I contradicted myself.

bob2356 says

Why would i loathe you?

You're triggered. I never intended that, but special snowflakes like you get trigger for no good reason. Quite frankly, you've made ad hominem attacks on me about as much as I've made against piggy, and that's hypocrisy.
bob2356 says

That it's a just cause when you do it and trolling/lying when anyone else does it.

I've counter-trolled, but I've never trolled. There is a huge difference. Trolls disrupt conversations. Counter-trolls make the trolls feel bad when they do. Purpose matters.

As for lying, I have never stated a lie on this website, ever. I challenge you to find a single lie I've told in the 26,720 comments I've made. You can't do that, and that makes you the liar. By the way, this is a standing challenge for anyone in the world.

Lying would entirely defeat the purpose of debate according to my values. To convince someone of a falsehood would be to lose a debate. The entire purpose of debate is to demonstrate the truth of your position. Not only does success require convincing the others, but it requires convincing others for the right reason. It requires that others understand why your position is correct. Any deception completely defeats that purpose. This is why I am morally and ethically superior to you. You frequently lie because you believe that convincing others is the end goal and it justifies any means. To me, understanding why true things are true is the end goal, and deception can never serve that purpose.

bob2356 says

Dan8267 says

I've called piggy out on being uncreative. That's not bitching.

That is trump level bullshit self justification spin.

No, it's not. You are just labeling it bitching because you are trying to poison the well with and ad hominem. Your hypocrisy is as create as piggy's.
errc says

Ouch. Now that's a smack down

Translation: I also hate Dan, so I'll support anyone attacking him.

You two are like third graders calling classmates names on the schoolyard, except you lack the creativity to do it in a funny way. I may be a smart ass, even arrogant at times, but I'm far more mature than either of you. The only question I have is which of you is trying to take piggy's place on PatNet.

In the interest of the PatNet community, I will offer you a one-time olive branch. We will never like each other and will never have a productive conversation, so let's go our separate ways and never speak of or to each other again. That's probably the best we can do, and PatNet would be better if people who obviously dislike each other simply stopped talking to each other.

You boys sure do a lot of what you say is unacceptable when others do it.

Putin Fanboy says

FortWayne says

Patrick I'll make you a good old American business deal, if ironman promises not to publish people's personal info again I'll pay $10 for his unban.

Having a mancrush on a bombastic douchebag speaks volumes about your character.

#fanboy

Nobody should be harassing people outside of this site, other than that I don't think people should be banned.

Was?

errc says

I disagree it's not camaraderie, it's yearning for protection in numbers.

Or it's not being easily offended by morons on the internet. Maybe some of you just need to congregate in your safe space where ironmen can't make you feel bad.

For me it's about free speech, and not being such pussies.

FortWayne says

For a minute I thought you were describing Dan there and few others.

HilARIOUS

NuttBoxer says

Is this the same as the Dodgerfan situation?

What was the Dogerfan situation?

Dan8267 says

I have never insulted a user who presented an honest argument no matter how flawed it was.

YesYNot says

What was the Dogerfan situation?

It involved a user named Dodgerfan, and something about personal information being posted. All I remember is the information was not really personal, and I think even contributed by the accuser, in some part.

Dan8267 says

Only propaganda and willful deception ever invoked my wraith.

What does Dan consider propaganda and willful deception? Anything he wants!

NuttBoxer says

Is Patrick surveilling us offline to see when we screw up so he can lower the ban-hammer?

Nope, not surveilling anyone.

NuttBoxer says

Dan8267 says

I have never insulted a user who presented an honest argument no matter how flawed it was.

If this is a lie, it would be trivially easy for you to point out a counter-example. If you do not, we all know who the real liar is.

Dan8267 says

If this is a lie, it would be trivially easy for you to point out a counter-example. If you do not, we all know who the real liar is.

You set yourself up pretty nicely for that one, how high was the horse you were on?

As to the examples, if you unblock me from your threads, you'll have plenty.

NuttBoxer says

You set yourself up pretty nicely for that one, how high was the horse you were on?

As to the examples, if you unblock me from your threads, you'll have plenty.

I call bullshit on you. You don't need to be able to post on my threads to quote them on this thread. You failed. Want to try again?

Congrats @Patrick and patnetters on killing a troll.

The thing is that while banning one idiot is good, banning 10 idiots is better. What we need is THE PURGE ANARCHY: PATNET EDITION

I want to see more than just one idiot banned, there are plenty of others that need to be banned in order to make the world safe for democracy. So take the the streets PATNET, the lights are out, the police are staying home to protect their own families.... who do you want to see banned and what are you willing to pay to make that happen?

Dan8267 says

My insults, whether you find them funny or not, did not disrupt the argument, but simply poked fun of dishonest and foolish opponents. I have never insulted a user who presented an honest argument no matter how flawed it was. Only propaganda and willful deception ever invoked my wraith.

I'm a necromancer.

tou·ché

Dan8267 says

I'm a necromancer.

Not the words I'd use to describe you.

Is it my browser or did I just make this fucker BOLD!

Hmmm, tag did not get closed. Allowing that to happen is a bug on my part.

test

Dan8267 says

bob2356 says

Dan8267 says

I've called piggy out on being uncreative. That's not bitching.

That is trump level bullshit self justification spin.

No, it's not. You are just labeling it bitching because you are trying to poison the well with and ad hominem. Your hypocrisy is as create as piggy's.

Got it. Dan insults people it's creative. People insult dan it's trolling. Dan posts gay porn and animal sex it's with a purpose, purpose matters. Other people post gay porn and animal sex it's trolling. Dan attacks people it demonstrates the truth in his position. People attack dan it's ad hominem. It's different for dan since he is
Dan8267 says

morally and ethically superior

How could I miss such a simple concept?

You make a dozen comments to my 1 and I'm triggered? Really. How does that work exactly?

Dan8267 says

We will never like each other and will never have a productive conversation, so let's go our separate ways and never speak of or to each other again. That's probably the best we can do, and PatNet would be better if people who obviously dislike each other simply stopped talking to each other.

Your ego runs away with you again. I don't dislike you at all. You make a lot of interesting posts, many of which I agree with. I dislike your frequent lapses into loathsome juvenile hypocritical behaviour and the ridiculous self justifications you advance for that type of behaviour. If patrick were looking to clean up disgusting, repulsive, and insulting posts you would be one of the top candidates for account deletion after CIC no matter what self righteous self serving justifications you incorrectly believe makes it right to post them.

People can like you just fine but dislike when you behave poorly.

bob2356, it's not hard to see how you and your fellow trolls operate. Any joke in which your team is the butt is unfunny, while the exact same joke against the other team is genius. You exemplify the polarization of America. Us vs. them. Real Americans versus not real Americans. And quite frankly, it's tiresome. I don't care what your opinion of me is because I don't respect you.

bob2356 says

You make a dozen comments to my 1 and I'm triggered? Really. How does that work exactly?

Obviously counting isn't your strong suit. As for how it works, calling fools on their bullshit isn't being triggered. Sure, you really want to troll people, and like all trolls you think you are successful. A troll's capacity for self-delusion knows no bounds. But really, your victories are all in your mind.

bob2356 says

Dan attacks people it demonstrates the truth in his position. People attack dan it's ad hominem.

An ad hominem is an irrelevant attack on a person to discredit his argument rather than attacking his arguments. Judging a person to be dishonest for repeatedly posting debunked lies that you have just demonstrated are lies with ample evidence from multiple sources is not the ad hominem fallacy. If you can't tell the difference between those two things, that's your failing.

bob2356 says

Your ego runs away with you again.

What you interpret as ego is actually conviction, and that's something you will never understand. I've always said "the messenger is irrelevant". You never could grasp that.

bob2356 says

People can like you just fine but dislike when you behave poorly.

Now you are just being dishonest about your actions to hide your shameful trolling.

One more reason why I don't think Ironman should have been banned, he did nothing different than Dan.

After all it was Dan who kept on posting gay port here all over the place, wasn't Ironman. I'm not advocating Dan be banned, I think he certainly adds "spice" to the site (free speech after all), but I also think Ironman should not be banned anymore either.

Dan should be banned for having such a horrific grasp on what is funny versus what is not. Holy crap, the guy is nuts

There is nothing funny about posting CiC likes goats and anal lube for the 300th time. It wasn't funny or clever the first time.

If an infant looked at you and said "goo goo ga ga" and then laughed, that would be a funnier joke than "cic likes animal husbandry and anal lube" over and over and over again

All victories for everyone originate in the mind.

Dan8267 says

But really, your victories are all in your mind.

rando says

Hmmm, tag did not get closed. Allowing that to happen is a bug on my part.

It's patnetters fault!
We are bug brained

.errc says

There is nothing funny about posting CiC likes goats and anal lube for the 300th time. It wasn't funny or clever the first time.

But is it true?

bob2356 and BlueSardine are just like Trump.

www.youtube.com/embed/_wMvItIDMPU

errc says

There is nothing funny about posting CiC likes goats and anal lube for the 300th time.

Sounds like Dan's bestiality obsession has caused errc to develop BAD(Bestiality-Anxiety-Disorder). See Rin's hoes, and thank him in the morning.

Dan, why are you wasting time with a shithead like bob2356?

I remember his greatest touchee against me was ...

"It's not London University, it's University of London!"

BAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Really, his greatest win was in a grammatical construct. It would be like you beating someone if he says Cambridge University (a day-to-day colloquialism) over the University of Cambridge, it's official name and most grammatically correct usage.

Seriously, the world is better off if these shitheads were simply not born or died of some psychosomatic illness.

Dan8267 says

I call bullshit on you.

And I call chicken-shit on you. Go back to your safe space threads Dan, the internet is too scary for you to handle unfiltered.

NuttBoxer says

And I call chicken-shit on you.

And I call bullshit on you again. I have a standing challenge to every person on the planet to debate me on any subject matter with Patrick as the moderator and experienced debate judges as the judges. If you don't take up this challenge, you are chickenshit.

Rin says

Dan, why are you wasting time with a shithead like bob2356?

You are right. If the dumbass trolls want the last word, let them take it. I have more than answered all their bullshit accusations. They are all wanna-be piggies.

I will add just one thing. The flame war in this thread perfectly demonstrates why trolls disrupt free speech by derailing conversations. Real free speech requires not tolerating trolls. This is why it's a good thing, and only a good thing, that piggy was banned.

www.youtube.com/embed/x56O4G8VsiA

If one doesn't agree with me,it's not Free Speech.

Rin says

I remember his greatest touchee against me was ...

"It's not London University, it's University of London!"

Ah yes, that was when you were regaling us with your extensive knowledge of an institution that you didn't even know the name of. If you're just making shit up you should at least take a minute and get the names right.

bob2356 says

take a minute and get the names right.

...whines a grouch who can't even distinguish between areas and area's, and complains when people try to explain the difference to him.

bob2356 says

Ah yes, that was when you were regaling us with your extensive knowledge of an institution that you didn't even know the name of. If you're just making shit up you should at least take a minute and get the names right.

And there he goes again, using a colloquial expression of a college's name, as a way of playing a trump card.

BTW, I refuse to discuss this with this troll, since throughout those discussions, he had failed to enlighten anyone else, actually asking questions about education which included MMR and 'Lips.

curious2, Dan, MMR, 'Lips, here's a wiki on University College London (of the University of London) system. My senior partner got his LLM there.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_College_London

Excerpt: "Established in 1826 as London University by founders inspired by the radical ideas of Jeremy Bentham, UCL was the first university institution to be established in London, and the first in England to be entirely secular and to admit students regardless of their religion.[12] UCL also makes the contested claims of being the third-oldest university in England[note 1] and the first to admit women.[note 2] In 1836 UCL became one of the two founding colleges of the University of London, which was granted a royal charter in the same year. "

Hmm... so even the official name, once had London University, as a starting point.

Guess what? It's still colloquially expressed as that and sure, in terms of exactness, it's University of London and grammatically speaking, it's more accurate but then again, you fellows already knew that, as ppl tend to call University of Cambridge ... Cambridge University. The same goes for University of Oxford to Oxford University. In fact, throughout Britain, most universities have the "of" in their official name.

I can see bob saying ... BAHAHAHA, he called it Cambridge University.

This guy sounds like a typical loser, public state university grad of West Wichita State, who constantly touts his CLEP numbers and scores in Advanced Control Theory, whenever he runs into a Penn or Columbia grad, feeling like he's trumped them when in reality, none of them would advance his resume for a management consulting job.

Rin says

My senior partner got his LLM there.

BTW, even he goes back and forth between calling it London University, University of London, or just plain London.

And he's an alumni.

Rin says

Rin says

My senior partner got his LLM there.

BTW, even he goes back and forth between calling it London University, University of London, or just plain London.

And he's an alumni.

This is classier version of the "We are the real Miami University" -- every Miami of Oh douche

CBOEtrader says

This is classier version of the "We are the real Miami University" -- every Miami of Oh douche

It's like having the following play in the background, while one touts one's overseas education ...

www.youtube.com/embed/3AQ-D_OnF-E