2
0

Trumps Son Met With Russian Lawyer After Being Promised Damaging Information on Clinton


 invite response                
2017 Jul 9, 1:33pm   29,710 views  181 comments

by Rew   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/09/us/politics/trump-russia-kushner-manafort.html

Trumps Son Met With Russian Lawyer After Being Promised Damaging Information on Clinton Search Subscribe Now Log In 0 Settings Close search Site Search Navigation Search NYTimes.com Clear this text input Go Loading... See next articles See previous articles Site Navigation Site Mobile Navigation Advertisement Supported by Politics Trumps Son Met With Russian Lawyer After Being Promised Damaging Information on Clinton By JO BECKER, MATT APUZZO and ADAM GOLDMANJULY 9, 2017 Continue reading the main storyShare This PageContinue reading the main story Photo A meeting arranged by Donald Trump Jr. was held at Trump Tower in June 2016 with a...

Great historical backdrop: http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/lawyer-probing-russian-corruption-says-his-balcony-fall-was-no-n780416

#TrumpIsPresident

« First        Comments 176 - 181 of 181        Search these comments

176   FortWayne   2017 Jul 17, 8:47pm  

Rew says

FortWayne says

You tell me what law did a private citizen (Trump Jr) broke here?

Jr was acting for the Trump campaign. He likely broke "11 CFR 110.20" ... elected or not.

That prohibits money donations, not communication. We live in a free country and this is still a nothing burger.

177   Rew   2017 Jul 17, 8:48pm  

WH pool reporter on twitter right now (paraphrased):
"Asked source if there was a secrete Senate plan ...'Nope we are flying the plane into the ground at full speed.' "

Haha.

178   bob2356   2017 Jul 18, 7:33am  

FortWayne says

That prohibits money donations, not communication.

Bzzt wrong. It prohibits a thing of value in connection with elections. Hard to argue jr wasn't connected with the election or that the information didn't have value to the campaign.

(b)Contributions and donations by foreign nationals in connection with elections. A foreign national shall not, directly or indirectly, make a contribution or a donation of money or other thing of value, or expressly or impliedly promise to make a contribution or a donation, in connection with any Federal, State, or local election.

179   FortWayne   2017 Jul 18, 7:35am  

bob2356 says

FortWayne says

That prohibits money donations, not communication.

Bzzt wrong. It prohibits a thing of value in connection with elections. Hard to argue jr wasn't connected with the election or that the information didn't have value to the campaign.

(b)Contributions and donations by foreign nationals in connection with elections. A foreign national shall not, directly or indirectly, make a contribution or a donation of money or other thing of value, or expressly or impliedly promise to make a contribution or a donation, in connection with any Federal, State, or local election.

Yep, still doesn't prohibit talking. Don't quit your day job to give out legal advice bob.

180   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   2017 Jul 18, 8:16am  

If they gave Russia the green light to hack the DNC and HRC and release the information publicly, that would be a big problem. If they coordinated with the Russians in their attempts to use the hacked information, that would be a problem. If they agreed to lift sanctions in return for such help, that would be a huge problem.

Jr's meeting isn't definitive proof of any of these things. If it were, he'd be in jail. It's just definitive proof that Trump Jr wanted to accept Russia's help, and circumstantial evidence that he did conspire with the Russians to commit cyber crimes. Politically, it's a problem, b/c most people can fill in the dots. If team Trump 'probably' conspired, you can't put them in jail, but it will have political implications.

181   anonymous   2017 Jul 18, 8:24am  

FortWayne says

Rew says

FortWayne says

That's not illegal

Backed by what great legal opinion is that?

You tell me what law did a private citizen (Trump Jr) broke here?

Why do you think it is that you are always so quick to defend anything these people do?

Does it feel natural?

« First        Comments 176 - 181 of 181        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste