« First « Previous Comments 76 - 87 of 87 Search these comments
LeonDurham saysIt's funny. Obama created more jobs in his last 18 months than Trump did in his first 18 months.
It's funny, why not do it apples to apples, compare Obama's first 18 months to Trumps first 18.
If someone really wanted to compare apples to apples, which they don't, then the 18 months before the inauguration would have to be included to see the trend going into the new presidency.
It's funny, why not do it apples to apples, compare Obama's first 18 months to Trumps first 18.
How much QE has Trump added to economy to get new jobs? Obama added $4 Trillion.
Why @Patrick tolerates trolls like you here is beyond me.
LeonDurham saysI think trolling is against the rules here.
Then why are you still allowed to post?
MrMagic says
It's funny, why not do it apples to apples, compare Obama's first 18 months to Trumps first 18.
How much QE has Trump added to economy to get new jobs? Obama added $4 Trillion.
I thought the point was obvious. All the Trumpkins claim that Trump has done great things for the economy.
Then why are you still allowed to post?
Nope, not obvious, but it will be as soon as you post Obama's numbers from his first 18 months as a comparison...
We'll be waiting...
Are YOU FUCKING SERIOUS? No, really? That was a serious question. Especially since a) things are a helluva lot better no matter how you spin things (or try to) and b) he isn't borrowing TRILLIONS. The new econ stats prove that was a bunch of total crap! Larry Kudlow has been vindicated, pal.
Trump first 18 months -- 3,432K jobs created
Obama last 18 months-- 3709K jobs created
It's funny, why not do it apples to apples, compare Obama's first 18 months to Trumps first 18.
Excellent--could you point to the post that you think is trolling?
Obama had multiple quarters of 4% growth.
But the sheeple somehow still believe that Trump has helped the economy. lol.
Leon, do you see the operative word in that sentence, "first". This is how you do an apples to apples comparison.
A "first" and "last" comparison shows absolutely nothing, except that you're just trolling again and being dishonest.
LOL
« First « Previous Comments 76 - 87 of 87 Search these comments
https://www.thestreet.com/story/14284462/1/corporate-tax-cuts-promote-ceo-pay-raises-and-stock-buybacks-not-jobs.html
"Researchers looked at 92 publicly-held companies that reported a U.S. profit from 2008 to 2015 and paid a federal income tax of less than 20%, the rate proposed by House Republicans, by exploiting loopholes in the current tax code.
The 92 companies examined saw median job growth of negative 1% over an eight-year period, compared to 6% across the entire U.S. private sector. Moreover, half of those firms eliminated jobs during that time, downsizing by a combined total of 483,000 jobs.
At the same time, average CEO pay among the 92 firms rose by 18%, compared to a 13% increase across the entire S&P 500"
But, cutting corporate tax rates would ABSOLUTELY enrich Trump himself. When the Trumpcucks realize that he cares not for the average American. Everything he does, he does for one reason alone. To enrich himself and his family.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-promised-put-american-workers-142940732.html
is another interesting article detailing how Trump has screwed the American worker but helped his businesses.
#MAGA