patrick.net

Onvacation says

Did you even look at the link?

I read the link just fine. I wasn't aware that the word china was a synonym for global. You learn something new on patnet every day.

Onvacation says

Here are the summaries of sever articles.

http://www.co2science.org/subject/g/globalmwp.php

co2science is funded by exxon so their credibility is pretty suspect. But I read it anyway. There is nothing there that says the mwp is global or continuous. It was all if then this and maybe that. like this example.

With respect to the world as a whole, the authors conclude that, "concerning the Medieval Warm Period (MWP), it is currently known that, from the 9th century to, apparently, the mid-15th century, the climatic conditions were warmer than during most of the subsequent five centuries, including the early 20th century." In some places, in fact, it was even warmer during the MWP than it was during the latter part of the 20th century.

Note the words like IN SOME PLACES, MOST OF, and EARLY 20TH CENTURY as in the early 1900's. This is right from co2science.org. Apparently you can't even get exxonmobile's flunkies to back you up.

Onvacation says

bob2356 says

co2science is funded by exxon so their credibility is pretty suspect. But I read it anyway. There is nothing there that says the mwp is global or continuous. It was all if then this and maybe that. like this example.

There were a bunch of summaries.

Show which ones document the mwp as sustained and global. Still waiting.

anonymous says

Show which ones document the mwp as sustained and global. Still waiting.

Can't help you if you won't look or don't believe the evidence of worldwide MWP.
Onvacation says

Do you deny the little ice age and the natural variation of climate as well?