patrick.net

This ad correctly targets only one race:

Interracial relationships are very liberating and also serve as a steak knife in granddad's ribs who is petrified that he is losing power of tradition as he is clinging to the catherer. The light is coming....

"t was a mysterious evil being from an unknown realm/dimension outside the regions of space. When It came to planet Earth to feed, its favorite disguise was that of a colorful and wisecracking circus clown named "Pennywise". It could also morph into any other being or thing it pleases, generally based on its target's loved ones or friends to lure them into Different traps. Or It just simply appear's to them as their very worst fears and nightmares.

It preferred to attract children instead of grownups, so it could capture and kill to devour them. It was capable of killing every kind of human but mostly preferred to prey upon innocent human children because they were easier to manipulate and scare. According to the creature, frightened flesh tastes better. "

Patrick says, "It's not just advertising. It's political indoctrination pretending to be just advertising. That's the annoying part.The agenda is globalism, the idea that there should be no borders, nor any distinct and strong historical communities who might possibly oppose our billionaire overlords."
Perhaps, but it is better than the balkanization pushed by the left to create little warring identity subgroups with little in common (need to avoid cultural appropriation). The left seeks to divide and destroy western (and probably all ) cultures, so they will be left in power.
My wife is Vietnamese and we overcome cultural and language barriers with a dose of mutual toleration, respect, and of course, affection.
Sometimes my wife insists on some odd divisions of labor based upon her "I am woman". I am never going to tell her, 'hey, your 3,000+ year-old culture is invalid compared to the wisdom of you American feminist sisters.

I’m also inter-racially married, but we share the same culture so there’s really not any of that sort of friction. I forget she’s not white most of the time. Her mom has a different culture and honestly I think I tolerate it better than my wife does.

I’ve noticed some ads like that but they don’t annoy me. Maybe they are just trying to reflect the modern American couple? Inter marriage is super common these days.

I know--I never notice them either. I know this is crazy talk, but maybe advertisers have found that if they are inclusive in their ads, they get more sales?? Perhaps?

Patrick says

They are definitely pushing an agenda

Yeah. It's called tolerance, and worrying about being accused of not reflecting reality. They probably have statisticians telling them what percent of advertisement couples should be mixed. And sure, those ads are going to occur at a higher rate in urban areas than in flyover country. Is that because of liberals conspiring ? Or is it just reflecting different audience demographics.

What is a conspiracy to one person is dotting your i's and crossing your t's to another.

joeyjojojunior says

I know this is crazy talk

Nahhhh ! It must be a liberal globalist conspiracy. It's white genocide I tell ya !!!!

I don't give a rats ass who they put in an add, since it changes nothing. It doesn't make anyone more or less tolerant, and certainly doesn't make the advertisers more enlightened.

Why the fuck should it matter if I'm white and my wife is Mexican? This obsession with surface looks has turned us into a shallow society of ignoramus's.

NuttBoxer says

This obsession with surface looks has turned us into a shallow society of ignoramus's.

I agree. And it's increasingly the McGees and Patricks and Oakmans of the world playing identity politics, turning into Special Snowflakes, and getting offended at nothing.

They need to grow up.

"Starbucks cups don't say Merry Christmas. I'm offended!!!!"
"This black NFL player didn't stand for the national anthem. I'm offended!!!!"
"This commercial had different races on it. I'm offended!!!!!!"

Patrick says

They are definitely pushing an agenda.

I think they are pushing sales, but ... you know ... I'm sure you know the customer base they are after best. (shrug) Maybe Patrick, just maybe, you are the minority in the area/media you are consuming? * GASP *

joeyjojojunior says

"Starbucks cups don't say Merry Christmas. I'm offended!!!!"

I'm expecting baby Jesus with uzis on top a tank driven by St. Nick this year. Massive Trumpian counter attack to save Christmas!!!!!! IT MUST BE SAVED!

Doesn't bother me-to each his own.

Folks, the long standing show, 'Fixer Upper' was about an interracial relationship, despite Joanna Gaines only being part-Korean.



Stop pretending that this is some new phenomena.

joeyjojojunior says

I agree. And it's increasingly the McGees and Patricks and Oakmans of the world playing identity politics, turning into Special Snowflakes, and getting offended at nothing.

I actually think Patrick's comment was spot on. But just because some elites have an agenda doesn't mean they're going to get it.

So fuck 'em.
www.vRblA0zoo-c?t=6

NuttBoxer says

joeyjojojunior says

I agree. And it's increasingly the McGees and Patricks and Oakmans of the world playing identity politics, turning into Special Snowflakes, and getting offended at nothing.

I actually think Patrick's comment was spot on.

So you self selected into the "white anger" group. Cool. Good for you.

Rew says

So you self selected into the "white anger" group. Cool. Good for you.

What should I be angry about?

NuttBoxer says

But just because some elites have an agenda doesn't mean they're going to get it.

The only agenda is coporation's agenda to make money.

The Top "Interracial Marriages" in the US are between White Males and either Asians or Hispanic Women.



Yet commercials show Blacks with Hispanics, Asians, and rarely Whites.

One way to look at that chart is white genes spreading to all other groups.

Patrick says

One way to look at that chart is white genes spreading to all other groups.

Bitchin about Whiteness on the Streets
Yet seeking colonization in the Sheets

Patrick says

One way to look at that chart is white genes spreading to all other groups.

Do you really think that a bit of White in the offspring of AOC or Omar will make more Whites? Also, breed with a Black woman and blonde-blue eyed in gone forever in that lineage.

White men are the prize; the females are interchangeable.

Like Blake said in Glengarry Glen Ross: "It's fuck or walk."

TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter says

The Top "Interracial Marriages" in the US are between White Males and either Asians or Hispanic Women.



Yet commercials show Blacks with Hispanics, Asians, and rarely Whites.

Grok agrees, and points out in a very convoluted way that race is certainly real, but Wikipedia and other far-left extremist sites deny reality in favor of leftist ideological conformity:

https://grokipedia.com/page/Race_and_sexuality

Biological realism in the context of race and sexuality asserts that human mating preferences, including tendencies toward racial endogamy, arise from innate biological mechanisms shaped by evolution, such as genetic compatibility and phenotypic similarity to maximize reproductive fitness.[13] Proponents cite evidence from assortative mating patterns, where individuals consistently pair with partners of similar racial backgrounds at rates exceeding random expectation, even in multicultural environments with ample opportunity for mixing; for instance, in the United States, over 90% of marriages remain within racial groups despite legal interracial marriage since 1967.[13] Twin studies further support a genetic basis, demonstrating that monozygotic twins exhibit greater similarity in spouse selection—particularly for traits like ethnicity and personality—than dizygotic twins, indicating heritability estimates around 30-50% for preferences toward genetically similar mates.[14] These findings align with evolutionary models positing that cues of genetic relatedness, including racial markers like skin tone and facial structure, trigger subconscious attraction to reduce outbreeding depression and enhance offspring viability.[15]

In contrast, social constructivism maintains that racial categories and associated sexual preferences lack inherent biological foundations, instead emerging from cultural norms, historical power dynamics, and socialization processes that impose artificial boundaries on desire.[16] Advocates argue that observed racial preferences reflect learned biases, such as media portrayals or familial conditioning, rather than fixed traits, and point to variability in interracial unions across societies as evidence of malleability; for example, rates of interracial marriage in the U.S. rose from 3% in 1967 to 17% by 2015, attributed to declining social taboos.[17] However, this view often overlooks persistent cross-cultural patterns of endogamy and the failure of prolonged exposure in diverse settings to erode preferences substantially, suggesting environmental explanations alone insufficiently account for the data.[13]

Critiques of social constructivism highlight its rhetorical deployment to counter biological accounts, potentially downplaying empirical regularities in favor of ideological commitments, as seen in academic fields where constructivist interpretations dominate despite contradictory genetic evidence.[16] Heritability research on mate traits, including physical attractiveness and resource cues correlated with racial averages, yields broad-sense estimates of 20-40%, implying a substantial innate component resistant to purely cultural erasure.[18] While constructivists emphasize the social fluidity of race, biological realists counter that human genetic clusters—corresponding roughly to continental ancestries—provide a substrate for evolved preferences, with admixture studies showing hybrid offspring face subtle fitness costs in immune function and morphology, incentivizing ancestral matching.[9] Reconciliation attempts, positing races as both biologically clustered and socially elaborated, falter when applied to sexuality, where twin and adoption data prioritize genetic over shared environmental influences on partner similarity.[19] Ultimately, the preponderance of longitudinal and cross-species evidence favors biological realism as causally primary, with social factors modulating rather than originating preferences.[20]