« First « Previous Comments 45 - 67 of 67 Search these comments
And it stands for call it crazy if I remember correctly, not that it matters a damn.Thanks. Barely remember that guy. Him and Renting for half the cost used to be great allies I believe.
You know what’s awesome about the new system? I’ll never be able to defend deleting a comment or banning anyone if a personal attack is not involved. It’s a pretty neat system.
You know what’s awesome about the new system? I’ll never be able to defend deleting a comment or banning anyone if a personal attack is not involved. It’s a pretty neat system.
Goran_K says
You know what’s awesome about the new system? I’ll never be able to defend deleting a comment or banning anyone if a personal attack is not involved. It’s a pretty neat system.
Maybe that’s what has the leftists so up in arms. There’s an actual standard and the bar can’t be moved without it being noticeable.
Errc was just making a point.
anon_84d68 saysErrc was just making a point.
Errc was being vulgar, obnoxious, and rude. There are rules against uncivility around here and he broke them.
Onvacation saysanon_84d68 saysErrc was just making a point.
Errc was being vulgar, obnoxious, and rude. There are rules against uncivility around here and he broke them.
Apparently that doesn’t stretch to libtard comments, racism, etc., etc.
anon_84d68 saysErrc was just making a point.
Errc was being vulgar, obnoxious, and rude. There are rules against uncivility around here and he broke them.
You can use the word libtard all you want as long as it’s not directed at someone personally.
Ok:
“Libtards are ruining the country.”
Not ok:
“You are a clueless fucking Libtard.”
Goran_K saysYou can use the word libtard all you want as long as it’s not directed at someone personally.
Ok:
“Libtards are ruining the country.”
Not ok:
“You are a clueless fucking Libtard.”
While ‘you libtards’ or anything along those lines is perfectly acceptable, because err, well fuck I don’t know.
anon_98513 saysGoran_K saysYou can use the word libtard all you want as long as it’s not directed at someone personally.
Ok:
“Libtards are ruining the country.”
Not ok:
“You are a clueless fucking Libtard.”
While ‘you libtards’ or anything along those lines is perfectly acceptable, because err, well fuck I don’t know.
Show me the post.
Goran_K saysanon_98513 saysGoran_K saysYou can use the word libtard all you want as long as it’s not directed at someone personally.
Ok:
“Libtards are ruining the country.”
Not ok:
“You are a clueless fucking Libtard.”
While ‘you libtards’ or anything along those lines is perfectly acceptable, because err, well fuck I don’t know.
Show me the post.
Pretty much every post ever made by TPB for starters.
Goran_K saysYou can use the word libtard all you want as long as it’s not directed at someone personally.
Ok:
“Libtards are ruining the country.”
Not ok:
“You are a clueless fucking Libtard.”
While ‘you libtards’ or anything along those lines is perfectly acceptable, because err, well fuck I don’t know.
Patrick allowed a few posters to be so beyond rude and disruptive that it’s ridiculous to ask that all of a sudden, everyone else change course.
errc saysPatrick allowed a few posters to be so beyond rude and disruptive that it’s ridiculous to ask that all of a sudden, everyone else change course.
Maybe Patrick now wants a site where people are NOT vulgar, rude, and obnoxious.
I could be wrong about the vulgar part.
@patrick Do you consider vulgarity uncivil?
I do.
anon_98513 saysGoran_K saysYou can use the word libtard all you want as long as it’s not directed at someone personally.
Ok:
“Libtards are ruining the country.”
Not ok:
“You are a clueless fucking Libtard.”
While ‘you libtards’ or anything along those lines is perfectly acceptable, because err, well fuck I don’t know.
So the actual problem isn’t the policy, it’s that you don’t understand the policy.
Or more accurately you’re plying at being obtuse because you think it makes a point(it doesn’t)
Fucking White Male saysanon_98513 saysGoran_K saysYou can use the word libtard all you want as long as it’s not directed at someone personally.
Ok:
“Libtards are ruining the country.”
Not ok:
“You are a clueless fucking Libtard.”
While ‘you libtards’ or anything along those lines is perfectly acceptable, because err, well fuck I don’t know.
So the actual problem isn’t the policy, it’s that you don’t understand the policy.
Or more accurately you’re plying at being obtuse because you think it makes a point(it doesn’t)
No, because the “rules” are not remotely applied even-handedly. The mere fact that you’ve popped up to chip in pretty much underscores my point given your posting history.
patrick Do you consider vulgarity uncivil?
Not necessarily. Vulgarity can be good natured. Consider AF. Usually vulgar, but rarely if ever uncivil.
Patrick says
Not necessarily. Vulgarity can be good natured. Consider AF. Usually vulgar, but rarely if ever uncivil.
He is a good barbarian. I like him.
Strategist saysPatrick says
Not necessarily. Vulgarity can be good natured. Consider AF. Usually vulgar, but rarely if ever uncivil.
He is a good barbarian. I like him.
I agree. He's opposite of me on the political spectrum, but he is by far the funniest poster on Patrick.net.
I see quite a few have him(her?) on ignore, and I think they are missing out.
« First « Previous Comments 45 - 67 of 67 Search these comments
So far I think the new rules are working. The deleting of personal attacks seems to be working a lot better than “uncivil”.
However certain members are still having a hard time understanding the new rule. I’ve had to delete 5 straight personal attacks from errrc.
Should we institute a 24 hour ban for repeated offenses? Like being deleted 3-4 times and warned with no improvement?