« First « Previous Comments 5 - 44 of 67 Next » Last » Search these comments
@Patrick
Suggestions?
Goran_K says@Patrick
Suggestions?
My suggestion is that you be removed as a moderator. This is a civil comment so lets see what you do with it.
That’s fine. How have I failed as a moderator?
Goran_K saysThat’s fine. How have I failed as a moderator?
No one respects you. You have so many enemies that you are going to become the topic of every conversation. What was written above is a great example. This is why you should be removed.
anon_25c83 saysGoran_K saysThat’s fine. How have I failed as a moderator?
No one respects you. You have so many enemies that you are going to become the topic of every conversation. What was written above is a great example. This is why you should be removed.
But so far I’ve not moderated anything unfairly, correct?
Goran_K saysanon_25c83 saysGoran_K saysThat’s fine. How have I failed as a moderator?
No one respects you. You have so many enemies that you are going to become the topic of every conversation. What was written above is a great example. This is why you should be removed.
But so far I’ve not moderated anything unfairly, correct?
Yea you keep deleting my posts. They are SFW at my job
You create a thread asking patrick to give you more power over other users and you wonder why people hate you so much.
So nothing moderated unfairly?
I thought so.
If you make 4-5 straight deleted attacks then you automatically get say a 12 hour ban to “cool off”
Goran_K saysIf you make 4-5 straight deleted attacks then you automatically get say a 12 hour ban to “cool off”
Yeah, yeah, and guess who's doing the deleting.
Patrick, zzyzzx, Wookie and myself. Doesn’t seem like anyone is debating that the deleted content has not been justly nuked.
The recent threads have been much more readable in terms of content.
baseless love-ins of Trump.
Goran_K saysThe recent threads have been much more readable in terms of content.
Hilarious. It's been dead, and it's just the usual suspects posting up a couple of their usual baseless love-ins of Trump.
But your back here checking and seeing the new and improved PatNet.
anon_b67e3 saysbaseless love-ins of Trump.
I for one do not love Trump.
But we did dodge the Hillary bullet.
Patrick, zzyzzx, Wookie and myself. Doesn’t seem like anyone is debating that the deleted content has not been justly nuked.
anon_b67e3 saysbaseless love-ins of Trump.
I for one do not love Trump.
But we did dodge the Hillary bullet.
Should we institute a 24 hour ban for repeated offenses? Like being deleted 3-4 times and warned with no improvement?
In the end I’m trying to get the discussions way more civil. The new rules seem to be working.
But this new Anon policy isn't. It just lets so many more people hide and not have to take responsibility for what they post.
Goran_K saysBut you’re back here checking and seeing the new and improved PatNet.
Haven't you got some fact free nonsense to post about climate change?
But so far I’ve not moderated anything unfairly, correct?
Right, Goran has been a fine moderator so far imho.
Patrick saysGoran_K saysBut so far I’ve not moderated anything unfairly, correct?
Right, Goran has been a fine moderator so far imho.
@patrick if someone is a liar and you call them a liar, how is that a personal attack if it's true that the individual is truly a liar?
If Goran wants to make statements that he can't back up, maybe he is not a good choice as a moderator.
If Goran wants to make statements that he can't back up, maybe he is not a good choice as a moderator.
Goran_K saysShould we institute a 24 hour ban for repeated offenses? Like being deleted 3-4 times and warned with no improvement?
@Goran_K yes, that's a good idea.
I'll work on that this morning.
Also @WookieMan
Also @WookieMan : note that moderators can now ban users from commenting in their topic for 24 hours.
Just go to their user page (click on their icon or name) and the ban link is at top. Let me know if it doesn't work.
Thanks for the suggestion, Goran.
Patrick saysAlso @WookieMan : note that moderators can now ban users from commenting in their topic for 24 hours.
Just go to their user page (click on their icon or name) and the ban link is at top. Let me know if it doesn't work.
Thanks for the suggestion, Goran.
I really don't want to use the feature but it's a necessary part of keeping things clean. Thanks for all the hard work Patrick.
No, it’s not. Patrick could simply ban the obvious trolls like CiC, but he doesn’t. That individual has done more than anyone to bring this site to its knees and yet Patrick just lets him roll back in, instead going down this path... in the process driving away two of the more interesting posters (what’s that, about 10% of the total regular posters?). He’s shooting himself in the foot once again. Things are just getting worse now with you trying to usurp more and more power. People will be up in arms for a while and then will simply drift away. You’ll be left with a small handful of right wingers posting fact free praise of your supposed great leader. And CiC will be long gone.
Can someone tell me what CiC means or stands for?
« First « Previous Comments 5 - 44 of 67 Next » Last » Search these comments
So far I think the new rules are working. The deleting of personal attacks seems to be working a lot better than “uncivil”.
However certain members are still having a hard time understanding the new rule. I’ve had to delete 5 straight personal attacks from errrc.
Should we institute a 24 hour ban for repeated offenses? Like being deleted 3-4 times and warned with no improvement?