« First « Previous Comments 66 - 105 of 160 Next » Last » Search these comments
errc saysI don’t find that in any way uncivil, it’s actually the pathway to a return to civility
So, you feel calling people liars all day today with ZERO evidence or proof is a "pathway to a return to civility"??
You really follow a strange pathway.
This thread is so much lulz.
Rin, can you secure some hookers? Half of Pat.net needs to get laid.
I saw him claim that ice would be gone in 5 years.
You should really learn how to spell his name correctly.
So who is putting the civil comments in jail today?
anon_30423 saysmust be the wife comments, those were the first to go.So who is putting the civil comments in jail today?
Good question, I just looked, it seems that someone formerly known as Ironman is #triggered bigly. Seems someone hit a nerve
errc saysanon_30423 saysmust be the wife comments, those were the first to go.So who is putting the civil comments in jail today?
Good question, I just looked, it seems that someone formerly known as Ironman is #triggered bigly. Seems someone hit a nerve
Looks like he jailed one of his own comments to throw us off the trail.
He loudly proclaimed his departure, but comes back and posts anon.
Claimed he would leave rather than post under moderation and rules. Returned under anon. Fairly easy to spot.
Time for Patrick to disable anons ;)
You will get your pure site soon enough. There is so much bad will here now that I think serious debate is gone for good.
Don't kid yourself, there is nobody new here, personally I'm probably 20 or 30 of those anons. Soon nobody from the left will be left and the right will have that echo chamber that they were accusing the left of try to have. Funny how that works.
People who bitch about all the ad homing have been ad homing at me since the Election, they didn't do so before
anon_25c83 saysYou will get your pure site soon enough. There is so much bad will here now that I think serious debate is gone for good.
Yes it is soon to be swallowed by the darkness. To bad so sad. We begged you @patrick to listen but you choose not to.
I get it, that's your choice.
Didn't expect you to take it in this direction.
Don't kid yourself, there is nobody new here, personally I'm probably 20 or 30 of those anons. Soon nobody from the left will be left and the right will have that echo chamber that they were accusing the left of try to have. Funny how that works.
It's the only forum where free speech lives.
anon_a0898 says
Don't kid yourself, there is nobody new here, personally I'm probably 20 or 30 of those anons. Soon nobody from the left will be left and the right will have that echo chamber that they were accusing the left of try to have. Funny how that works.
Trump winning caused the Left to go full bore nuts, especially re: the Russian Conspiracy Theory, which states the Russians hacked the Election by revealing email evidence that proved the DNC rigged the Primaries for Hillary.
People who bitch about all the ad homing have been ad homing at me since the Election, they didn't do so before.
FortWayne saysIt's the only forum where free speech lives.
Icing on the cake this comment. Fuck this place. It's where free speech goes to die.
anon_a0898 says
Don't kid yourself, there is nobody new here, personally I'm probably 20 or 30 of those anons. Soon nobody from the left will be left and the right will have that echo chamber that they were accusing the left of try to have. Funny how that works.
Trump winning caused the Left to go full bore nuts, especially re: the Russian Conspiracy Theory, which states the Russians hacked the Election by revealing email evidence that proved the DNC rigged the Primaries for Hillary.
People who bitch about all the ad homing have been ad homing at me since the Election, they didn't do so before.
mell saysTime for Patrick to disable anons ;)
I did for a while, but brought it back, because it does seem to bring in a few new users.
TwoScoopsMcGee saysanon_a0898 says
Don't kid yourself, there is nobody new here, personally I'm probably 20 or 30 of those anons. Soon nobody from the left will be left and the right will have that echo chamber that they were accusing the left of try to have. Funny how that works.
Trump winning caused the Left to go full bore nuts, especially re: the Russian Conspiracy Theory, which states the Russians hacked the Election by revealing email evidence that proved the DNC rigged the Primaries for Hillary.
People who bitch about all the ad homing have been ad homing at me since the Election, they didn't do so before.
Have to agree. And this is only one manifestation. You have been seeing similar things outside of the web. People on the left going full on bonkers and devoting thei...
What a sad ending. Patrick, please block all anons so I can find better things to do.
« First « Previous Comments 66 - 105 of 160 Next » Last » Search these comments
It is more than a little ironic (but should not be surprising to any serious student of human nature) that right-wingers appear to be every bit as eager to censor their opponents as they have recently been accusing the left-wingers of being. And by that I mean the last several years of talk about liberals and their desire for "safe spaces" on and off university campuses, calling them "special snowflakes", and so on.
Well, the right-wing has in recent days been out in force on Patnet, trying to enforce a "safe space" , free of "uncivility" and "NSFW" material, and acting like special snowflakes themselves. And boy, are these right-wing special snowflakes melting down Patnet in a volcanic eruption of censorship actions.
The famous 1960s psychological experiment known as the Stanford Prisoner Project comes to mind as an analogy of sorts. That experiment showed what happens when you give authority for random people to control other random people. What soon happened was not pretty. Read up on it if you want.
Finally, I will revisit and highlight a suggestion I have made several times this year:
What I would like to see is to have free speech, and at the same time avoid massive storms of low-quality comments. For a blog, I think that means to make threads and comments a limited commodity for all posters. Specifically, to limit the number of threads that a user can post on any given day to 1 or 2, and to limit how many comments every user can post on every thread to 10, or 10% of the total number of comments on the thread, whichever is larger.
The purpose of moderation should not be to censor certain forms of expression, but rather to make everyone's time (or space) on the proverbial soapbox a valuable commodity. That way, users are more likely to spend their posting currency wisely. Users who wastes their currency by posting low-quality drivel will lose esteem, or at the very least not be able to dominate the discussion based on volume posted only.
Think of it as rules of order, a very lightweight and blog-adapted version of Robert's rules of order. (By the way, a quite well-known now former pat-netter just mentioned Robert's rules just days ago, and is hereby recognized.)
PS: I very well understand the meta-question as to whether the impact of a blog, as measured by commercial value or informative value, or even political/propaganda value(!), is reduced when the number of threads or comments are somewhat limited. I think many people may think so, perhaps even Patrick himself. Personally, I will take quality over quantity any day.
#misc