by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 13 - 52 of 97 Next » Last » Search these comments
Onvacation saysCan anyone explain why they measure co2 from an active volcano?
Isotopic signature demonstrates added carbon in atmosphere comes predominantly from fossil fuels.
Not to mention simple accounting show humans emit twice as much carbon as the increase in the atmosphere.
That's easy to explain and easy for any honest person to understand if they bother to look it up.
In any case, now is the time for a complete embargo of Africa and to start developing and spraying birth control there.
Interesting? Makes me wonder about the methodology. Do you have a source for the "isotopic signature" study?
anon_01798 saysWhy not? According to the alarmists, CO2 raises the temperature, and everyone knows plants love CO2.
Aren't both of those situations (warmer and more CO2) beneficial to plants?
Depends on what it does to relative humidity. Last I checked, plants don't love the Sahara. Nor do they love getting 8" of rain in a day.
We literally have to have an increase of 1C in the next decade to match the average of 102 historical IPCC forecasts.
IPCC Climate Models are wayyyyyy off from observed reality. Until their predictions fall closer to observed reality, they should be discounted.
Sprawl is very energy intensive.
Onvacation saysInteresting? Makes me wonder about the methodology. Do you have a source for the "isotopic signature" study?
Do you have Google on your computer?
TwoScoopsPlissken saysIPCC Climate Models are wayyyyyy off from observed reality. Until their predictions fall closer to observed reality, they should be discounted.
There is even a gif debunking your image:
Why a gif, if only to disallow any serious dissection of the displayed information...
A manually controlled slideshow would have given more validity to the subject matter.
because of the nature of organic plant decay that emits CO2, such a mass spectrometry analysis is bogus.
So, it's just another line of evidence, strengthening the case for what should be obvious.
So, it's just another line of evidence, strengthening the case for what should be obvious.
BlueSardine saysWhy a gif, if only to disallow any serious dissection of the displayed information...
A manually controlled slideshow would have given more validity to the subject matter.
What next? Are you going to say that the creator of the gif drives a red car, and only people with blue cars are trustworthy?
So charts displayed for 2 seconds constitutes irrefutable evidence. I see...
Why do you think the Earth is cooling now?
The earth is cooling because of the suns diminishing output.
I see. So how much is the sun's output falling?
Google solar cycles. It will be educational!
in the past:
How large is the dust bowl globally?
You do know that Skeptical science is one of those alarmist sites that scares children? Don't you?
Onvacation saysWhy is the earth cooling now?
Why do you think the Earth is cooling now?
It sure looked to me like the ice core proxies are underreporting CO2. Very possible because of how ice melts and refreezes several times before becoming permanent ice (if ever), and why (ie atmospheric temp OR weight pressure)
Not much. Just a little more than it was warming. Not much.
Google solar cycles. It will be educational!
They claim that less than 2 degrees (manipulated) over 2 centuries is alarming
Carbon Doomsday
We see CO2 concentrations increasing.
Not sure again why you talk of 2 degrees.
« First « Previous Comments 13 - 52 of 97 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,235,890 comments by 14,781 users - desertguy, KgK one, Onvacation, Rin, Stout online now