« First « Previous Comments 721 - 760 of 1,408 Next » Last » Search these comments
Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected.
Perhaps the awnser is in front of us, and we need militias to protect our schools and other public spaces?
GreaterNYCDude says
Perhaps the awnser is in front of us, and we need militias to protect our schools and other public spaces?
Or maybe just a trained assistant principle with a Glock.
Or may be just enforce fucking existing laws,
I don't argue against arming teachers and principals, but in the whole discussion on "National level" common sense seems to be lost. In LOGIC! we ask questions like what could have been done to prevent shooting. Answer, at least in last few school shootings, is that they would have been prevented if EXISTING laws would have been enforced, and that they would have been much less deadly if heroes in BLUE! would have done their damned job. New laws will not do anything if they don't enforce (or enforce only selectively) the existing laws. The lack of logic in presstitute and politician discussions is truly infuriating.
The Post Millennial
@TPostMillennial
Jun 14
Tucker Carlson: "If you can take their guns, why can't you take their homes? Why can't you empty their bank accounts? Ooh sound paranoid, Alex Jones stuff? That just happened in Canada."
RWSGFY says
https://mobile.twitter.com/visegrad24/status/1536301391106408453
FUCKING NAZI!!!
Eric Holder says
RWSGFY says
https://mobile.twitter.com/visegrad24/status/1536301391106408453
FUCKING NAZI!!!
should explain why these news aren't main stream in US. faggots here want to disarm all of us here. every day I check news sites (not to read, but to see what the faggots are selling)... they are still pushing gun control, some shit about standing with Ukraine, and now January 6 comedy show.
More Legal Guns Reduced Crime in Brazil
Homicide fell 34% after Bolsonaro made firearms permits easier and cheaper.
“Lives are on the line,” President Biden said after the Supreme Court held New York state’s restrictive gun-permit regime unconstitutional last week. Gov. Kathy Hochul warned: “This could place millions of New Yorkers in harm’s way.” Brazil’s experience suggests otherwise.
Answer, at least in last few school shootings, is that they would have been prevented if EXISTING laws would have been enforced, and that they would have been much less deadly if heroes in BLUE! would have done their damned job.
New York Times opinion editor wants a gun
By Tom Knighton | Jun 30
Personal Information of Every California Concealed-Carry Permit Holder Leaked
« First « Previous Comments 721 - 760 of 1,408 Next » Last » Search these comments
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Couple things to note in there:
1. The specific mention of a militia being the reason for the need to bear arms.
2. The 2nd Amendment never mentions the word gun at all.
So, what exactly is the definition of "arms"?
In 1755 Dr. Johnson’s Dictionary of the English Language was first published. It defined “arms” as “weapons of offence, or armour of defence.”
Weapons of offence would seem to include pretty much anything and everything, from knives to nuclear weapons. The US has already seen fit to ban some weapons of offence so the 2nd Amendment clearly has not been interpreted strictly as meaning that the US cannot ban all "arms". Therefore, the 2nd Amendment does not guarantee citizens the right to own whatever weapons they choose.
So it then becomes a question of which weapons should be banned, which should be strictly regulated, and which should be lightly regulated or not at all. Like anything else, we should weigh an individual's right with society's right. When looked at in that manner, it becomes very difficult to justify why fully automatic or semi automatic rifles should be allowed. What purpose do they serve an individual? And why would that purpose outweigh the extreme damage those weapons have cased society??
Patrick thinks the Chamber of Commerce is the worst organization, and he may be correct, but the NRA is not far behind.