patrick.net

FP says

LOL

Never said I was perfect.

btw, keep your comments focused on topic, not the individual. I had to nuke another one of your comments.

FP says

Did you learn about slavery, KKK and LBJ in 2008?

Yes, I discovered a lot of the dirtiness behind the DNC around that time. I saw Obama engage in one of the most race baiting campaigns I've ever seen a presidential candidate run. It made me wonder why I was part of the party. I did a lot of reading, and made the decision to leave the party.

Goran_K says

btw, keep your comments focused on topic, not the individual. I had to nuke another one of your comments.

Don't tell me what to do. My comment should, at most, mirror yours.

@patrick

I'm not telling you what to do, just enforcing rules. You're on the borderline with your comments when it comes to making them personal. If you cut it out, I don't ever have to get rid of your comments. Just relax, it's not that serious.

@Patrick

Goran continues to delete comments that do not violate the rules. When are you going to do anything about it?

When are you going to delete his comment with personal attack against me? I am still waiting. Please follow your own rules.

Since my comments are being deleted for no good reason, until you solve your moderator problem, I'll include @patrick in all my comments.

Goran_K says

I'm not telling you what to do, just enforcing rules

I don't violate the rules any more than you do and you are lying. We established this for a fact yesterday.

@Patrick

FP says

@Patrick

Goran continues to delete comments that do not violate the rules. When are you going to do anything about it?

When are you going to delete his comment with personal attack against me? I am still waiting. Please follow your own rules.

Since my comments are being deleted for no good reason, until you solve your moderator problem, I'll include @patrick in all my comments.

There’s a pattern here. Tread lightly. You don’t seem willing to blow Trump, so ypu will be treated as on the opposing team

Patrick says

FP says

That's what I wish too. So please restore my comment, which Goran deleted , and delete Goran's attack against me.

@FP Deleted comments are really gone, since backups happen at night.

Can you just repost it? Please do not make it about Goran or about any other user, or about all patrick.net users.

@patrick,

I did repost it yesterday (by memory) and he has deleted it again. Please restore it from you overnight backup and deal with your moderator.

Do you wish your site to be moderated by people who apply and violate the rules selectively.

errc says

Tread lightly.

Nah, I'll just expose hypocrisy and dishonesty (I'm smart enough to be able to do it within the rules) until something breaks one way or another. I'm enjoying it and this is what this site used to be about once upon a time. @patrick

I suspect FP will be the next to lose the ability to post threads and will have all his comments go immediately to moderation...

Goran_K says

Yes, I discovered a lot of the dirtiness behind the DNC around that time. I saw Obama engage in one of the most race baiting campaigns I've ever seen a presidential candidate run. It made me wonder why I was part of the party. I did a lot of reading, and made the decision to leave the party.

I don't expect you actually want to learn, but just in case, here is some good material for you:

https://medium.com/everyvote/how-the-republicans-and-democrats-switched-on-civil-rights-in-5-racist-steps-92c1b41480b

https://forwardprogressives.com/the-truth-about-republican-racism-and-the-southern-strategy/

I can provide some more if you want to further your learning. Just let me know.

I'm just about to ban the fucking word "you".

Don't want to read anything about any user.

Except moderators do indeed have the right to ask users to stop talking about other users. Goran is doing a fine job.

Patrick says

Except moderators do indeed have the right to ask users to stop talking about other users.

@patrick,

Yes, but we have a case where a moderator is: (1) talking about other users, (2) does not allow to be asked by others to stop talking about other uses, (3) deletes comments that do not violate the rules, and (4) lies about the latter.

Furthermore, addressing somebody, or asking somebody a question, is not the same as talking about them.

I looked at Goran's comments and they look OK to me.

I get notified of comments marked "personal" and nearly all of them are indeed personal.

FP says

Goran_K says

Democrats/leftist are the most racist people in the country (fought to maintain slavery, formed the KKK, invented a new slavery via LBJ's "great society" movement, their entire identity politics platform).

Goran_K says

I voted Democrat in every Presidential election until 2008

LOL

@FP I want to keep this in my records. I'll just repost it in resppnse to attacks against democaats/leftists/liberals. Thanks Goran!

Patrick says

I looked at Goran's comments and they look OK to me.

I get notified of comments marked "personal" and nearly all of them are indeed personal.

@Patrick,

What was "personal" in the comments that he deleted?

How is the coment that I asked you repeatedly to delete not personal? He claims that I have insulted him. Where was the insult in my comment (I reposted it)?

He is writing again above that I'm commenting about other users. This is an insinuation (which is a personal attack!). How are my comments any worse than his?

Please follow your own rules and prevent personal attacks by your moderator.

FP says

Except moderators do indeed have the right to ask users to stop talking about other users.

@patrick,

Yes, but we have a case where a moderator is: (1) talking about other users, (2) does not allow to be asked by others to stop talking about other uses, (3) deletes comments that do not violate the rules, and (4) lies about the latter.

Furthermore, addressing somebody, or asking somebody a question, is not the same as talking about them.

@FP keep this too

HappyGilmore says

I suspect FP will be the next to lose the ability to post threads and will have all his comments go immediately to moderation...

Fair and Balanced

Liberals ruined everything

had to do some work, read through the newest comments, and STILL haven't seen any response to this graph.

Patrick says

I'm just about to ban the fucking word "you".

Don't want to read anything about any user.

Except moderators do indeed have the right to ask users to stop talking about other users. Goran is doing a fine job.

A bang up job, indeed.

Why do so many people keep complaining about him, it’s wierd that they cannot see that he is Fair and Balanced, and always very genuine and honest

Leftists don’t like reason or facts. They mostly enjoy bullying and intimidation, spiced with a side of dogma and groupthink.

Goran_K says

had to do some work, read through the newest comments, and STILL haven't seen any response to this graph.

Maybe it was deleted.

Right wingers are imbeciles.

FP says

Right wingers are imbeciles.

Everyone knows this

The worst is the phony coward right wingers who are too ashamed to admit that they’re halfwits so they call themselves Libertarians. Lmao

Goran_K says

had to do some work, read through the newest comments, and STILL haven't seen any response to this graph.

What are you confused about, it seems rather straightforward

errc says

What are you confused about, it seems rather straightforward

Good, that's exactly my point.

errc says

Everyone knows this

But do you think they, being so dumb, are aware of this fact? Because if not, I can challenge some of them to an IQ competition and they may fall for it. It will be easy money. I think they like betting too.

FP says

errc says

Everyone knows this

But do you think they, being so dumb, are aware of this fact? Because if not, I can challenge some of them to an IQ competition and they may fall for it. It will be easy money. I think they like betting too.

No it’s fairly obvious they aren’t very self aware, otherwise they wouldn’t be right wing pawns. And you could try, but they don’t have money to wager, and even if they did, their word is shit so impossible to have a Gentleman’s wager with people lacking any constitution

errc says

their word is shit

Yes, you are right. They are very dishonest and hypocritical. Which is quite ironic since these are two of the characteristics of SJW's and the PC movement against which they rage so much. But dumb is dumb, what can you do?

FP says

explain US vs other developed countries

Might be higher income inequality in US and more ethnically and racially mixed population.

Edit: and a good case in point is actually El Paso, which is ethnically homogeneous (>90% Hispanic) and has very low crime.

drB6 says

FP says

explain US vs other developed countries

Might be higher income inequality in US and more ethnically and racially mixed population.

Edit: and a good case in point is actually El Paso, which is ethnically homogeneous (>90% Hispanic) and has very low crime.

Might be this, might be that. Anything but guns.

You were in academia, right? What's your discipline? It's not physics right?

Canada and Australia are ethnically diverse.

There are Eastern European countries with large income inequality and population living below the poverty line.

Goran_K says

errc says

Vermont is sparsely populated with the only city center type town being a college town on the Canadian border.

Wrong.

Vermont has lots of gun nutters. One of the most active NRA chapters is in Vermont, and they can own Class III NFA items (not available in California or New York).

Lots of Democrats = Lots of gun homicide

Vermont has very few blacks = low crime rate. This is the unfortunate truth.

Left has no points, just demands onto taxpayers.

FP says

Because if not, I can challenge some of them to an IQ competition and they may fall for it.

If there is a real, digital, fair method id happily challenge anyone on this board to an IQ test challenge.

FP says

Canada and Australia are ethnically diverse.

There are Eastern European countries with large income inequality and population living below the poverty line.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Canadians

Canada is 2.5% black. Yes they have a low crime rate

FP says

Canada and Australia are ethnically diverse.

They were highly developed Anglo-Saxon nations before they had diversity. Australia had a Whites-only, then an "Educated-Only" policy most of the past century.

Canada is about 80% White, with a Native population larger than the US at 5%. Add in East Asians at 8%, and Canada is 93% Indigenous, White, or East Asian. With only 7% from mostly Shithole Countries.

Despite taking in Lebanese (big crime element) and Asians in numbers, Australia is still 90% White. In other words, about the same as China which is about 90% Han Chinese. Han Chinese dominate in every last Chinese province except Tibet and Xikiang, the latter which due to deliberate policies of relocating Han to Turkic Areas, it is now 45% Han Chinese.

Indeed, one can make the case that the median White household is worse off (considering more Mothers work these days, also) since the the 1960s Immigration Act.

FP says

There are Eastern European countries with large income inequality and population living below the poverty line.

Do you honestly believe if they took in a hundred thousand or so NAFRA refugees, they'd be richer for it?

They're colonies of Germany, deliberately de-industrialized after the Cold War to ensure they couldn't compete with Germany by offering low-cost goods based on lower labor and electric costs. Like GM and the Trollies, the Germans brought up the factories, used the machines for scrap metal, and shut 'em down. Much of the money that Germany was allowed to go over EU limits to borrow in the 90s for Reunification actually was spent "Investing" in Eastern Europe.

Germany's war on coal isn't solely motivated by Greeny Goodness.

drB6 says

FP says

explain US vs other developed countries

Might be higher income inequality in US and more ethnically and racially mixed population.

Edit: and a good case in point is actually El Paso, which is ethnically homogeneous (>90% Hispanic) and has very low crime.

First define "developed countries". Every time the left pulls out this garbage line they cherry pick a few European countries plus a few homogonous Asian countries.

A far better comparison would be Mexico or Brazil, as they are similarly diverse. How are we doing I'm violent crime compared to those places?

If you want to compare to Iceland, New Hampshire here in the states has comparable income, diversity and crime rates.

CBOEtrader says

FP says

Canada and Australia are ethnically diverse.

There are Eastern European countries with large income inequality and population living below the poverty line.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Canadians

Canada is 2.5% black. Yes they have a low crime rate

How do you propose we resolve the black problem?

errc says

How do you propose we resolve the black problem?

Abraham Lincoln thought they should be Hotep'd. Send them back to Africa, the goddamn magic wonderland where in the ancient days of Wakanda, they built UFO Anti-gravity Pyramids that traveled the stars until Yakub the literal White Devil showed up.

The true sign of Ra's blessing is the Black Man thrives in the hot sun, but the Evil White Devil is burned and cursed with the Melanoma by the lifegiving Rays of Ra.

Seriously though, the NigNog is a subset of Black People, who causes most of the problems. Send the Hair Hatted Houligan Bastard Factories to the Unwed Mothers home. That will solve most of the Urban Crime Problem. Work, no Thugs to Fuck, No 40s Allowed, no problems of Black Youth corrupted by Nasty Nappy Hos.

It's for everybody, including Trailer White Trash Hos too.